Role and significance of legal customs in national jurisdictions (in terms of the Russian Federation)

In the Russian legal science, there is an established opinion that today legal custom plays a secondary role in the system of sources of law, or even that it is a rudiment and is not required in regulation of social relations anyway. This position of scientists is explained by the fact that theories...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:DIXI 2022-01, Vol.24 (1), p.1-22
Hauptverfasser: Pavlovich Anisimov, Aleksey, Jakovlevich Ryzhenkov, Anatoliy, Viktorovna Sokolskaya, Lyudmila
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 22
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title DIXI
container_volume 24
creator Pavlovich Anisimov, Aleksey
Jakovlevich Ryzhenkov, Anatoliy
Viktorovna Sokolskaya, Lyudmila
description In the Russian legal science, there is an established opinion that today legal custom plays a secondary role in the system of sources of law, or even that it is a rudiment and is not required in regulation of social relations anyway. This position of scientists is explained by the fact that theories rejecting custom as a source of law were common in the ussr since the 1920s. There were numerous attempts to substantiate the impossibility and needlessness of its use in a socialist state. It was justified by the fact that custom is a “primitive” form of law that is not capable of efficiently regulating social relations and even hinders their development. Having studied the modern practice of application of customs in various branches of private and public law, the authors give reasons for the conclusion that the scope of legal customs still retains its significance in Russia. It is proved that the role of customs differs in respect of fields of private and public law, occupying an insignificant place within the latter. However, also in that case there is transformation of established ideas about legal customs, their position in the system of sources of law and the role in the system of legal regulation of social relations are revised. The authors of the article substantiate the need to preserve legal custom in the system of sources of law and propose measures to increase the efficiency of their use.
doi_str_mv 10.16925/2357-5891.2022.01.09
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dialnet_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001511848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001511848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-f88e72ac06ac176c039236d7c491d1e580f93be01d87d7eb3e342eadde394d783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_gpCjHnbN52YDXkqxKhSEUs8hTWZryjYryfbgv3e31Z6GeWeeGXgQuqekpJVm8olxqQpZa1oywlhJaEn0FZpc4ms0IZSJQjEpb9Es57AlQigulKATBOuuBWyjxznsYmiCs9EB7hrcws622B1z3x0yDhFH24cuDtn-mEL2wY1txg_DqIc07AxQ_wV4fRx-2IiX4CGdmMc7dNPYNsPsr07R5_Jls3grVh-v74v5qnC0Fn3R1DUoZh2prKOqcoRrxiuvnNDUU5A1aTTfAqG-Vl7BlgMXDKz3wLXwquZT9Hy-64NtI_TmO4WDTT-ms8H8Z8cYUuj21kA28_WGEEIlHf6PuDzjLnU5J2guPCXmZNuMWs2o1Yy2DaGGaP4L7Dl0RA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role and significance of legal customs in national jurisdictions (in terms of the Russian Federation)</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Dialnet</source><creator>Pavlovich Anisimov, Aleksey ; Jakovlevich Ryzhenkov, Anatoliy ; Viktorovna Sokolskaya, Lyudmila</creator><creatorcontrib>Pavlovich Anisimov, Aleksey ; Jakovlevich Ryzhenkov, Anatoliy ; Viktorovna Sokolskaya, Lyudmila</creatorcontrib><description>In the Russian legal science, there is an established opinion that today legal custom plays a secondary role in the system of sources of law, or even that it is a rudiment and is not required in regulation of social relations anyway. This position of scientists is explained by the fact that theories rejecting custom as a source of law were common in the ussr since the 1920s. There were numerous attempts to substantiate the impossibility and needlessness of its use in a socialist state. It was justified by the fact that custom is a “primitive” form of law that is not capable of efficiently regulating social relations and even hinders their development. Having studied the modern practice of application of customs in various branches of private and public law, the authors give reasons for the conclusion that the scope of legal customs still retains its significance in Russia. It is proved that the role of customs differs in respect of fields of private and public law, occupying an insignificant place within the latter. However, also in that case there is transformation of established ideas about legal customs, their position in the system of sources of law and the role in the system of legal regulation of social relations are revised. The authors of the article substantiate the need to preserve legal custom in the system of sources of law and propose measures to increase the efficiency of their use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0124-7255</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2357-5891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.16925/2357-5891.2022.01.09</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>business custom ; costumbre empresarial ; costumbre jurídica ; costume empresarial ; costume jurídico ; fontes do direito ; formas de derecho ; formas de direito ; forms of law ; fuentes del derecho ; legal custom ; legal system ; normas de derecho consuetudinario ; regras do direito consuetudinário ; rules of customary law ; sistema jurídico ; sources of law</subject><ispartof>DIXI, 2022-01, Vol.24 (1), p.1-22</ispartof><rights>LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,870,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pavlovich Anisimov, Aleksey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakovlevich Ryzhenkov, Anatoliy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viktorovna Sokolskaya, Lyudmila</creatorcontrib><title>Role and significance of legal customs in national jurisdictions (in terms of the Russian Federation)</title><title>DIXI</title><description>In the Russian legal science, there is an established opinion that today legal custom plays a secondary role in the system of sources of law, or even that it is a rudiment and is not required in regulation of social relations anyway. This position of scientists is explained by the fact that theories rejecting custom as a source of law were common in the ussr since the 1920s. There were numerous attempts to substantiate the impossibility and needlessness of its use in a socialist state. It was justified by the fact that custom is a “primitive” form of law that is not capable of efficiently regulating social relations and even hinders their development. Having studied the modern practice of application of customs in various branches of private and public law, the authors give reasons for the conclusion that the scope of legal customs still retains its significance in Russia. It is proved that the role of customs differs in respect of fields of private and public law, occupying an insignificant place within the latter. However, also in that case there is transformation of established ideas about legal customs, their position in the system of sources of law and the role in the system of legal regulation of social relations are revised. The authors of the article substantiate the need to preserve legal custom in the system of sources of law and propose measures to increase the efficiency of their use.</description><subject>business custom</subject><subject>costumbre empresarial</subject><subject>costumbre jurídica</subject><subject>costume empresarial</subject><subject>costume jurídico</subject><subject>fontes do direito</subject><subject>formas de derecho</subject><subject>formas de direito</subject><subject>forms of law</subject><subject>fuentes del derecho</subject><subject>legal custom</subject><subject>legal system</subject><subject>normas de derecho consuetudinario</subject><subject>regras do direito consuetudinário</subject><subject>rules of customary law</subject><subject>sistema jurídico</subject><subject>sources of law</subject><issn>0124-7255</issn><issn>2357-5891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FKZ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_gpCjHnbN52YDXkqxKhSEUs8hTWZryjYryfbgv3e31Z6GeWeeGXgQuqekpJVm8olxqQpZa1oywlhJaEn0FZpc4ms0IZSJQjEpb9Es57AlQigulKATBOuuBWyjxznsYmiCs9EB7hrcws622B1z3x0yDhFH24cuDtn-mEL2wY1txg_DqIc07AxQ_wV4fRx-2IiX4CGdmMc7dNPYNsPsr07R5_Jls3grVh-v74v5qnC0Fn3R1DUoZh2prKOqcoRrxiuvnNDUU5A1aTTfAqG-Vl7BlgMXDKz3wLXwquZT9Hy-64NtI_TmO4WDTT-ms8H8Z8cYUuj21kA28_WGEEIlHf6PuDzjLnU5J2guPCXmZNuMWs2o1Yy2DaGGaP4L7Dl0RA</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Pavlovich Anisimov, Aleksey</creator><creator>Jakovlevich Ryzhenkov, Anatoliy</creator><creator>Viktorovna Sokolskaya, Lyudmila</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>AGMXS</scope><scope>FKZ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Role and significance of legal customs in national jurisdictions (in terms of the Russian Federation)</title><author>Pavlovich Anisimov, Aleksey ; Jakovlevich Ryzhenkov, Anatoliy ; Viktorovna Sokolskaya, Lyudmila</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-f88e72ac06ac176c039236d7c491d1e580f93be01d87d7eb3e342eadde394d783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>business custom</topic><topic>costumbre empresarial</topic><topic>costumbre jurídica</topic><topic>costume empresarial</topic><topic>costume jurídico</topic><topic>fontes do direito</topic><topic>formas de derecho</topic><topic>formas de direito</topic><topic>forms of law</topic><topic>fuentes del derecho</topic><topic>legal custom</topic><topic>legal system</topic><topic>normas de derecho consuetudinario</topic><topic>regras do direito consuetudinário</topic><topic>rules of customary law</topic><topic>sistema jurídico</topic><topic>sources of law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pavlovich Anisimov, Aleksey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakovlevich Ryzhenkov, Anatoliy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viktorovna Sokolskaya, Lyudmila</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Dialnet (Open Access Full Text)</collection><collection>Dialnet</collection><jtitle>DIXI</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pavlovich Anisimov, Aleksey</au><au>Jakovlevich Ryzhenkov, Anatoliy</au><au>Viktorovna Sokolskaya, Lyudmila</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role and significance of legal customs in national jurisdictions (in terms of the Russian Federation)</atitle><jtitle>DIXI</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>1-22</pages><issn>0124-7255</issn><eissn>2357-5891</eissn><abstract>In the Russian legal science, there is an established opinion that today legal custom plays a secondary role in the system of sources of law, or even that it is a rudiment and is not required in regulation of social relations anyway. This position of scientists is explained by the fact that theories rejecting custom as a source of law were common in the ussr since the 1920s. There were numerous attempts to substantiate the impossibility and needlessness of its use in a socialist state. It was justified by the fact that custom is a “primitive” form of law that is not capable of efficiently regulating social relations and even hinders their development. Having studied the modern practice of application of customs in various branches of private and public law, the authors give reasons for the conclusion that the scope of legal customs still retains its significance in Russia. It is proved that the role of customs differs in respect of fields of private and public law, occupying an insignificant place within the latter. However, also in that case there is transformation of established ideas about legal customs, their position in the system of sources of law and the role in the system of legal regulation of social relations are revised. The authors of the article substantiate the need to preserve legal custom in the system of sources of law and propose measures to increase the efficiency of their use.</abstract><doi>10.16925/2357-5891.2022.01.09</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0124-7255
ispartof DIXI, 2022-01, Vol.24 (1), p.1-22
issn 0124-7255
2357-5891
language eng
recordid cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001511848
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Dialnet
subjects business custom
costumbre empresarial
costumbre jurídica
costume empresarial
costume jurídico
fontes do direito
formas de derecho
formas de direito
forms of law
fuentes del derecho
legal custom
legal system
normas de derecho consuetudinario
regras do direito consuetudinário
rules of customary law
sistema jurídico
sources of law
title Role and significance of legal customs in national jurisdictions (in terms of the Russian Federation)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T14%3A51%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dialnet_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20and%20significance%20of%20legal%20customs%20in%20national%20jurisdictions%20(in%20terms%20of%20the%20Russian%20Federation)&rft.jtitle=DIXI&rft.au=Pavlovich%20Anisimov,%20Aleksey&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=1-22&rft.issn=0124-7255&rft.eissn=2357-5891&rft_id=info:doi/10.16925/2357-5891.2022.01.09&rft_dat=%3Cdialnet_cross%3Eoai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001511848%3C/dialnet_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true