Incorporating stand level risk management options into forest decision support systems
Aim of study: To examine methods of incorporating risk and uncertainty to stand level forest decisions.Area of study: A case study examines a small forest holding from Jönköping, Sweden.Material and methods: We incorporate empirically estimated uncertainty into the simulation through a Monte Carlo a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Forest Systems 2017-01, Vol.26 (3), p.e013-e013 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e013 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | e013 |
| container_title | Forest Systems |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Eyvindson, Kyle Saad, Rami Eriksson, Ljusk Ola |
| description | Aim of study: To examine methods of incorporating risk and uncertainty to stand level forest decisions.Area of study: A case study examines a small forest holding from Jönköping, Sweden.Material and methods: We incorporate empirically estimated uncertainty into the simulation through a Monte Carlo approach when simulating the forest stands for the next 100 years. For the iterations of the Monte Carlo approach, errors were incorporated into the input data which was simulated according to the Heureka decision support system. Both the Value at Risk and the Conditional Value at Risk of the net present value are evaluated for each simulated stand.Main results: Visual representation of the errors can be used to highlight which decision would be most beneficial dependent on the decision maker’s opinion of the forest inventory results. At a stand level, risk preferences can be rather easily incorporated into the current forest decision support software.Research highlights: Forest management operates under uncertainty and risk. Methods are available to describe this risk in an understandable fashion for the decision maker. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.5424/fs/2017263-10445 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>swepub_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001257089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0035b772ee95425d91fee8195504a319</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_slubar_slu_se_94000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-cfaffa2b4cab7eadc9835843dee9b58188aac4d418a6c1cff25daf4c8697eaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcFq3DAURU1poSHNvkv9gBtJlmwJugmhaQcChTJ0K57lp0GpRzJ6mob8fT0ZU8jqics9Z6HbNJ8F_6KVVLeBbiUXg-y7VnCl9LvmSopBtNYo_X57a96bj80NURy5HmwveSeumt-75HNZcoEa04FRhTSxGf_izEqkP-wICQ54xFRZXmrMiVhMNbOQC1JlE_pIa8rotKySyuiFKh7pU_MhwEx4s93rZv_wbX__o338-X13f_fYeqVkbX2AEECOysM4IEzemk4b1U2IdtRGGAPg1aSEgd4LH4LUEwTlTW_Xeuium91FO2V4ckuJRygvLkN0r0EuBwelRj-j47zT4zDI1bx-mZ6sCIhGWK25gk7Y1fV1c0WYE9a3ui07pVhifgKH5O5-7TnnQuqBmzPeXnB6xuU0vqFpPo1QzscROqtWbO3zS9-XTFQw_CcEd-dRXSC3jepeR-3-AUFhmRo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incorporating stand level risk management options into forest decision support systems</title><source>Dialnet</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Eyvindson, Kyle ; Saad, Rami ; Eriksson, Ljusk Ola</creator><creatorcontrib>Eyvindson, Kyle ; Saad, Rami ; Eriksson, Ljusk Ola ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>Aim of study: To examine methods of incorporating risk and uncertainty to stand level forest decisions.Area of study: A case study examines a small forest holding from Jönköping, Sweden.Material and methods: We incorporate empirically estimated uncertainty into the simulation through a Monte Carlo approach when simulating the forest stands for the next 100 years. For the iterations of the Monte Carlo approach, errors were incorporated into the input data which was simulated according to the Heureka decision support system. Both the Value at Risk and the Conditional Value at Risk of the net present value are evaluated for each simulated stand.Main results: Visual representation of the errors can be used to highlight which decision would be most beneficial dependent on the decision maker’s opinion of the forest inventory results. At a stand level, risk preferences can be rather easily incorporated into the current forest decision support software.Research highlights: Forest management operates under uncertainty and risk. Methods are available to describe this risk in an understandable fashion for the decision maker.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2171-5068</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2171-9845</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2171-9845</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5424/fs/2017263-10445</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)</publisher><subject>conditional value at risk ; forest management ; Forest Science ; inventory error ; risk preferences ; Skogsvetenskap ; value at risk</subject><ispartof>Forest Systems, 2017-01, Vol.26 (3), p.e013-e013</ispartof><rights>LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-cfaffa2b4cab7eadc9835843dee9b58188aac4d418a6c1cff25daf4c8697eaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-cfaffa2b4cab7eadc9835843dee9b58188aac4d418a6c1cff25daf4c8697eaf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,870,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/94000$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eyvindson, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saad, Rami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eriksson, Ljusk Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Incorporating stand level risk management options into forest decision support systems</title><title>Forest Systems</title><description>Aim of study: To examine methods of incorporating risk and uncertainty to stand level forest decisions.Area of study: A case study examines a small forest holding from Jönköping, Sweden.Material and methods: We incorporate empirically estimated uncertainty into the simulation through a Monte Carlo approach when simulating the forest stands for the next 100 years. For the iterations of the Monte Carlo approach, errors were incorporated into the input data which was simulated according to the Heureka decision support system. Both the Value at Risk and the Conditional Value at Risk of the net present value are evaluated for each simulated stand.Main results: Visual representation of the errors can be used to highlight which decision would be most beneficial dependent on the decision maker’s opinion of the forest inventory results. At a stand level, risk preferences can be rather easily incorporated into the current forest decision support software.Research highlights: Forest management operates under uncertainty and risk. Methods are available to describe this risk in an understandable fashion for the decision maker.</description><subject>conditional value at risk</subject><subject>forest management</subject><subject>Forest Science</subject><subject>inventory error</subject><subject>risk preferences</subject><subject>Skogsvetenskap</subject><subject>value at risk</subject><issn>2171-5068</issn><issn>2171-9845</issn><issn>2171-9845</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FKZ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkcFq3DAURU1poSHNvkv9gBtJlmwJugmhaQcChTJ0K57lp0GpRzJ6mob8fT0ZU8jqics9Z6HbNJ8F_6KVVLeBbiUXg-y7VnCl9LvmSopBtNYo_X57a96bj80NURy5HmwveSeumt-75HNZcoEa04FRhTSxGf_izEqkP-wICQ54xFRZXmrMiVhMNbOQC1JlE_pIa8rotKySyuiFKh7pU_MhwEx4s93rZv_wbX__o338-X13f_fYeqVkbX2AEECOysM4IEzemk4b1U2IdtRGGAPg1aSEgd4LH4LUEwTlTW_Xeuium91FO2V4ckuJRygvLkN0r0EuBwelRj-j47zT4zDI1bx-mZ6sCIhGWK25gk7Y1fV1c0WYE9a3ui07pVhifgKH5O5-7TnnQuqBmzPeXnB6xuU0vqFpPo1QzscROqtWbO3zS9-XTFQw_CcEd-dRXSC3jepeR-3-AUFhmRo</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Eyvindson, Kyle</creator><creator>Saad, Rami</creator><creator>Eriksson, Ljusk Ola</creator><general>Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>AGMXS</scope><scope>FKZ</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Incorporating stand level risk management options into forest decision support systems</title><author>Eyvindson, Kyle ; Saad, Rami ; Eriksson, Ljusk Ola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-cfaffa2b4cab7eadc9835843dee9b58188aac4d418a6c1cff25daf4c8697eaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>conditional value at risk</topic><topic>forest management</topic><topic>Forest Science</topic><topic>inventory error</topic><topic>risk preferences</topic><topic>Skogsvetenskap</topic><topic>value at risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eyvindson, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saad, Rami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eriksson, Ljusk Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>Dialnet (Open Access Full Text)</collection><collection>Dialnet</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Forest Systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eyvindson, Kyle</au><au>Saad, Rami</au><au>Eriksson, Ljusk Ola</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incorporating stand level risk management options into forest decision support systems</atitle><jtitle>Forest Systems</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e013</spage><epage>e013</epage><pages>e013-e013</pages><issn>2171-5068</issn><issn>2171-9845</issn><eissn>2171-9845</eissn><abstract>Aim of study: To examine methods of incorporating risk and uncertainty to stand level forest decisions.Area of study: A case study examines a small forest holding from Jönköping, Sweden.Material and methods: We incorporate empirically estimated uncertainty into the simulation through a Monte Carlo approach when simulating the forest stands for the next 100 years. For the iterations of the Monte Carlo approach, errors were incorporated into the input data which was simulated according to the Heureka decision support system. Both the Value at Risk and the Conditional Value at Risk of the net present value are evaluated for each simulated stand.Main results: Visual representation of the errors can be used to highlight which decision would be most beneficial dependent on the decision maker’s opinion of the forest inventory results. At a stand level, risk preferences can be rather easily incorporated into the current forest decision support software.Research highlights: Forest management operates under uncertainty and risk. Methods are available to describe this risk in an understandable fashion for the decision maker.</abstract><pub>Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)</pub><doi>10.5424/fs/2017263-10445</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2171-5068 |
| ispartof | Forest Systems, 2017-01, Vol.26 (3), p.e013-e013 |
| issn | 2171-5068 2171-9845 2171-9845 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001257089 |
| source | Dialnet; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | conditional value at risk forest management Forest Science inventory error risk preferences Skogsvetenskap value at risk |
| title | Incorporating stand level risk management options into forest decision support systems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A05%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-swepub_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incorporating%20stand%20level%20risk%20management%20options%20into%20forest%20decision%20support%20systems&rft.jtitle=Forest%20Systems&rft.au=Eyvindson,%20Kyle&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e013&rft.epage=e013&rft.pages=e013-e013&rft.issn=2171-5068&rft.eissn=2171-9845&rft_id=info:doi/10.5424/fs/2017263-10445&rft_dat=%3Cswepub_doaj_%3Eoai_slubar_slu_se_94000%3C/swepub_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0035b772ee95425d91fee8195504a319&rfr_iscdi=true |