Bank Regulation and Monetary Policy Transmission: Evidence from the U.S. States Liberalization

Replication files for "Bank Regulation and Monetary Policy Transmission: Evidence from the U.S. States Liberalization" by Lakdawala, Minetti, and Schaffer. Abstract: This paper studies the impact of geographic banking restrictions on monetary policy transmission. Exploiting the staggered d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Lakdawala, Aeimit, Minetti, Raoul, Schaffer, Matthew
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Lakdawala, Aeimit
Minetti, Raoul
Schaffer, Matthew
description Replication files for "Bank Regulation and Monetary Policy Transmission: Evidence from the U.S. States Liberalization" by Lakdawala, Minetti, and Schaffer. Abstract: This paper studies the impact of geographic banking restrictions on monetary policy transmission. Exploiting the staggered deregulation of U.S. banking from the late 1970s to the early 1990s, we find that interstate deregulation significantly increased the responsiveness of bank lending to monetary shocks. This effect occurred primarily for small and illiquid banks, pointing to a strengthening of the bank lending channel. Changes in bank market structure and loan portfolio composition are unlikely to explain the effect of deregulation. This instead reflects a reduced propensity of small banks affiliated with complex holding companies to insulate borrowers from monetary contractions.
doi_str_mv 10.7910/dvn/zx7uga
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_7910_dvn_zx7uga</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_7910_dvn_zx7uga</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d71a-8b9e2cb387664a93cb5e190a3cc26106b735047dff6a338789a70546baeecab13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzz1PwzAUhWEvDKiw8As8IyW168RO2KAqH1IQiIYV69q-KRaJgxK3ov31DZTpLK-O9BByxVmqSs7mbhfmhx-13cA5-biD8EXfcLNtIfo-UAiOPvcBIwx7-tq33u5pPUAYOz-OU3BDVzvvMFikzdB3NH4ifU_XKV1HiDjSyhscoPWHv7sLctZAO-Ll_85Ifb-ql49J9fLwtLytEqc4JIUpcWGNKJSUGZTCmhx5yUBYu5CcSaNEzjLlmkaCmKqiBMXyTBpAtGC4mJHr062DCNZH1N-D7yaB5kz_mvVk1iezOAKlzVLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Bank Regulation and Monetary Policy Transmission: Evidence from the U.S. States Liberalization</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Lakdawala, Aeimit ; Minetti, Raoul ; Schaffer, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Lakdawala, Aeimit ; Minetti, Raoul ; Schaffer, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>Replication files for "Bank Regulation and Monetary Policy Transmission: Evidence from the U.S. States Liberalization" by Lakdawala, Minetti, and Schaffer. Abstract: This paper studies the impact of geographic banking restrictions on monetary policy transmission. Exploiting the staggered deregulation of U.S. banking from the late 1970s to the early 1990s, we find that interstate deregulation significantly increased the responsiveness of bank lending to monetary shocks. This effect occurred primarily for small and illiquid banks, pointing to a strengthening of the bank lending channel. Changes in bank market structure and loan portfolio composition are unlikely to explain the effect of deregulation. This instead reflects a reduced propensity of small banks affiliated with complex holding companies to insulate borrowers from monetary contractions.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.7910/dvn/zx7uga</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Harvard Dataverse</publisher><subject>Bank Regulation, Bank Lending Channel, Monetary Policy ; Social Sciences</subject><creationdate>2021</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.7910/dvn/zx7uga$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lakdawala, Aeimit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minetti, Raoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaffer, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>Bank Regulation and Monetary Policy Transmission: Evidence from the U.S. States Liberalization</title><description>Replication files for "Bank Regulation and Monetary Policy Transmission: Evidence from the U.S. States Liberalization" by Lakdawala, Minetti, and Schaffer. Abstract: This paper studies the impact of geographic banking restrictions on monetary policy transmission. Exploiting the staggered deregulation of U.S. banking from the late 1970s to the early 1990s, we find that interstate deregulation significantly increased the responsiveness of bank lending to monetary shocks. This effect occurred primarily for small and illiquid banks, pointing to a strengthening of the bank lending channel. Changes in bank market structure and loan portfolio composition are unlikely to explain the effect of deregulation. This instead reflects a reduced propensity of small banks affiliated with complex holding companies to insulate borrowers from monetary contractions.</description><subject>Bank Regulation, Bank Lending Channel, Monetary Policy</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNotzz1PwzAUhWEvDKiw8As8IyW168RO2KAqH1IQiIYV69q-KRaJgxK3ov31DZTpLK-O9BByxVmqSs7mbhfmhx-13cA5-biD8EXfcLNtIfo-UAiOPvcBIwx7-tq33u5pPUAYOz-OU3BDVzvvMFikzdB3NH4ifU_XKV1HiDjSyhscoPWHv7sLctZAO-Ll_85Ifb-ql49J9fLwtLytEqc4JIUpcWGNKJSUGZTCmhx5yUBYu5CcSaNEzjLlmkaCmKqiBMXyTBpAtGC4mJHr062DCNZH1N-D7yaB5kz_mvVk1iezOAKlzVLA</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Lakdawala, Aeimit</creator><creator>Minetti, Raoul</creator><creator>Schaffer, Matthew</creator><general>Harvard Dataverse</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Bank Regulation and Monetary Policy Transmission: Evidence from the U.S. States Liberalization</title><author>Lakdawala, Aeimit ; Minetti, Raoul ; Schaffer, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d71a-8b9e2cb387664a93cb5e190a3cc26106b735047dff6a338789a70546baeecab13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bank Regulation, Bank Lending Channel, Monetary Policy</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lakdawala, Aeimit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minetti, Raoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaffer, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lakdawala, Aeimit</au><au>Minetti, Raoul</au><au>Schaffer, Matthew</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Bank Regulation and Monetary Policy Transmission: Evidence from the U.S. States Liberalization</title><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>Replication files for "Bank Regulation and Monetary Policy Transmission: Evidence from the U.S. States Liberalization" by Lakdawala, Minetti, and Schaffer. Abstract: This paper studies the impact of geographic banking restrictions on monetary policy transmission. Exploiting the staggered deregulation of U.S. banking from the late 1970s to the early 1990s, we find that interstate deregulation significantly increased the responsiveness of bank lending to monetary shocks. This effect occurred primarily for small and illiquid banks, pointing to a strengthening of the bank lending channel. Changes in bank market structure and loan portfolio composition are unlikely to explain the effect of deregulation. This instead reflects a reduced propensity of small banks affiliated with complex holding companies to insulate borrowers from monetary contractions.</abstract><pub>Harvard Dataverse</pub><doi>10.7910/dvn/zx7uga</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.7910/dvn/zx7uga
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_7910_dvn_zx7uga
source DataCite
subjects Bank Regulation, Bank Lending Channel, Monetary Policy
Social Sciences
title Bank Regulation and Monetary Policy Transmission: Evidence from the U.S. States Liberalization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A11%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Lakdawala,%20Aeimit&rft.date=2021&rft_id=info:doi/10.7910/dvn/zx7uga&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_7910_dvn_zx7uga%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true