Replication Data for: Crossing the Line: Evidence for the categorization theory of spatial voting

Replication Data for: Crossing the Line: Evidence for the categorization theory of spatial voting

Bølstad and Dinas (2017) propose a model of spatial voting, based on social identity theory, that suggests supporting a candidate/policy on the other side of the ideological spectrum has a disutility that is not accounted for by common spatial-models. Unfortunately, the data they use cannot speak di...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Pickup, Mark, Kimbrough, Erik O., De Rooij, Eline A.
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Social Sciences
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Pickup, Mark
Kimbrough, Erik O.
De Rooij, Eline A.
description Bølstad and Dinas (2017) propose a model of spatial voting, based on social identity theory, that suggests supporting a candidate/policy on the other side of the ideological spectrum has a disutility that is not accounted for by common spatial-models. Unfortunately, the data they use cannot speak directly to whether the disutility arises because individuals perceive their ideology as a social identity. We present the results of an experimental study that measures the norm against crossing the ideological spectrum; tests the cost of doing so, controlling for spatial effects; and demonstrates that this cost increases with the salience and strength of identity norms. By demonstrating the norm mechanism for the disutility of crossing the ideological spectrum, we provide strong support for B&D’s model.
doi_str_mv 10.7910/dvn/x5aqo6
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_7910_dvn_x5aqo6</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_7910_dvn_x5aqo6</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d716-aba9f1ce905b77e1fc0deb03e5aaf7aa64682c78afbd2fe48f347e744c6bed563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tqwzAURLXpoqTd9Au0LjiRYluysytu-gBDoWRvrqSrVOBIrmxM06-vUmc1cJgZOIQ8cLaWNWcbM_vNTwnfQdwS-MShdxomFzx9hgmoDXFHmxjG0fkjnb6Qts7jju5nZ9BrvBT-cRrhMUT3u4wTCvFMg6XjkAj0dA5TurgjNxb6Ee-vuSKHl_2hecvaj9f35qnNjOQiAwW15RprViopkVvNDCqWYwlgJYAoRLXVsgKrzNZiUdm8kCiLQguFphT5ijwutyZJaDdhN0R3gnjuOOsu2l3S7hbt_A8lgFUJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Replication Data for: Crossing the Line: Evidence for the categorization theory of spatial voting</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Pickup, Mark ; Kimbrough, Erik O. ; De Rooij, Eline A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pickup, Mark ; Kimbrough, Erik O. ; De Rooij, Eline A.</creatorcontrib><description>Bølstad and Dinas (2017) propose a model of spatial voting, based on social identity theory, that suggests supporting a candidate/policy on the other side of the ideological spectrum has a disutility that is not accounted for by common spatial-models. Unfortunately, the data they use cannot speak directly to whether the disutility arises because individuals perceive their ideology as a social identity. We present the results of an experimental study that measures the norm against crossing the ideological spectrum; tests the cost of doing so, controlling for spatial effects; and demonstrates that this cost increases with the salience and strength of identity norms. By demonstrating the norm mechanism for the disutility of crossing the ideological spectrum, we provide strong support for B&amp;D’s model.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.7910/dvn/x5aqo6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Harvard Dataverse</publisher><subject>Social Sciences</subject><creationdate>2023</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-5808-920X ; 0000-0002-6495-0430 ; 0000-0003-0539-1138</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1894</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.7910/dvn/x5aqo6$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pickup, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimbrough, Erik O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Rooij, Eline A.</creatorcontrib><title>Replication Data for: Crossing the Line: Evidence for the categorization theory of spatial voting</title><description>Bølstad and Dinas (2017) propose a model of spatial voting, based on social identity theory, that suggests supporting a candidate/policy on the other side of the ideological spectrum has a disutility that is not accounted for by common spatial-models. Unfortunately, the data they use cannot speak directly to whether the disutility arises because individuals perceive their ideology as a social identity. We present the results of an experimental study that measures the norm against crossing the ideological spectrum; tests the cost of doing so, controlling for spatial effects; and demonstrates that this cost increases with the salience and strength of identity norms. By demonstrating the norm mechanism for the disutility of crossing the ideological spectrum, we provide strong support for B&amp;D’s model.</description><subject>Social Sciences</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tqwzAURLXpoqTd9Au0LjiRYluysytu-gBDoWRvrqSrVOBIrmxM06-vUmc1cJgZOIQ8cLaWNWcbM_vNTwnfQdwS-MShdxomFzx9hgmoDXFHmxjG0fkjnb6Qts7jju5nZ9BrvBT-cRrhMUT3u4wTCvFMg6XjkAj0dA5TurgjNxb6Ee-vuSKHl_2hecvaj9f35qnNjOQiAwW15RprViopkVvNDCqWYwlgJYAoRLXVsgKrzNZiUdm8kCiLQguFphT5ijwutyZJaDdhN0R3gnjuOOsu2l3S7hbt_A8lgFUJ</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Pickup, Mark</creator><creator>Kimbrough, Erik O.</creator><creator>De Rooij, Eline A.</creator><general>Harvard Dataverse</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5808-920X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6495-0430</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0539-1138</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Replication Data for: Crossing the Line: Evidence for the categorization theory of spatial voting</title><author>Pickup, Mark ; Kimbrough, Erik O. ; De Rooij, Eline A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d716-aba9f1ce905b77e1fc0deb03e5aaf7aa64682c78afbd2fe48f347e744c6bed563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pickup, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimbrough, Erik O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Rooij, Eline A.</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pickup, Mark</au><au>Kimbrough, Erik O.</au><au>De Rooij, Eline A.</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Replication Data for: Crossing the Line: Evidence for the categorization theory of spatial voting</title><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><abstract>Bølstad and Dinas (2017) propose a model of spatial voting, based on social identity theory, that suggests supporting a candidate/policy on the other side of the ideological spectrum has a disutility that is not accounted for by common spatial-models. Unfortunately, the data they use cannot speak directly to whether the disutility arises because individuals perceive their ideology as a social identity. We present the results of an experimental study that measures the norm against crossing the ideological spectrum; tests the cost of doing so, controlling for spatial effects; and demonstrates that this cost increases with the salience and strength of identity norms. By demonstrating the norm mechanism for the disutility of crossing the ideological spectrum, we provide strong support for B&amp;D’s model.</abstract><pub>Harvard Dataverse</pub><doi>10.7910/dvn/x5aqo6</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5808-920X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6495-0430</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0539-1138</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.7910/dvn/x5aqo6
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_7910_dvn_x5aqo6
source DataCite
subjects Social Sciences
title Replication Data for: Crossing the Line: Evidence for the categorization theory of spatial voting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T12%3A12%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Pickup,%20Mark&rft.date=2023&rft_id=info:doi/10.7910/dvn/x5aqo6&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_7910_dvn_x5aqo6%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true