Replication Data for: A Note on Increases in Inattentive Online Survey-Takers Since 2020

Lucid, a popular source of online convenience survey samples, has seen a significant increase in inattentive respondents since 2020. Inattentive participants – respondents who incorrectly answer directed query attention check questions – may be introducing substantial measurement error and attenuati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ternovski, John, Orr, Lilla
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Ternovski, John
Orr, Lilla
description Lucid, a popular source of online convenience survey samples, has seen a significant increase in inattentive respondents since 2020. Inattentive participants – respondents who incorrectly answer directed query attention check questions – may be introducing substantial measurement error and attenuation bias. Using data from 152,967 survey respondents across multiple studies conducted between January 2020 and June 2021, we find that inattentive respondents report less reliable demographic data, less stable responses, and are systematically different from attentive respondents. We find some evidence of attenuation bias and mixed evidence that data quality has decreased slightly since 2020 even after filtering for inattentive respondents. We conclude that researchers using Lucid should report if they screened on attentiveness and consider replicating any null results. Such an unexpected increase in inattentiveness in a widely-used platform suggests that future researchers relying on online convenience survey samples should continuously assess data quality.
doi_str_mv 10.7910/dvn/frm1ic
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_7910_dvn_frm1ic</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_7910_dvn_frm1ic</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d71c-5864b2f135b62aaf7c440e64bd83598bf449172e52b8d79fc9af02afc5526cf43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjz1rwzAURbV0KGmX_gLNBTeSLFl2tpB-BUIDjYdu4ll6AhFHDrJqyL-vQzpd7hku9xDyxNmLbjhbuikufTrxYO_Jzzee-2AhhyHSV8hA_ZBWdE2_hox0ZttoE8KIIw3XAjljzGFCuo99iEgPv2nCS9HCEdNIDyFapIIJ9kDuPPQjPv7ngrTvb-3ms9jtP7ab9a5wmttC1ZXshOel6ioB4LWVkuHMXF2qpu68lA3XApXoaqcbbxvwTIC3SonKelkuyPNt1s3fbchozimcIF0MZ-Zqa2Zbc7Mt_wBhnk74</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Replication Data for: A Note on Increases in Inattentive Online Survey-Takers Since 2020</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Ternovski, John ; Orr, Lilla</creator><creatorcontrib>Ternovski, John ; Orr, Lilla</creatorcontrib><description>Lucid, a popular source of online convenience survey samples, has seen a significant increase in inattentive respondents since 2020. Inattentive participants – respondents who incorrectly answer directed query attention check questions – may be introducing substantial measurement error and attenuation bias. Using data from 152,967 survey respondents across multiple studies conducted between January 2020 and June 2021, we find that inattentive respondents report less reliable demographic data, less stable responses, and are systematically different from attentive respondents. We find some evidence of attenuation bias and mixed evidence that data quality has decreased slightly since 2020 even after filtering for inattentive respondents. We conclude that researchers using Lucid should report if they screened on attentiveness and consider replicating any null results. Such an unexpected increase in inattentiveness in a widely-used platform suggests that future researchers relying on online convenience survey samples should continuously assess data quality.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.7910/dvn/frm1ic</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Harvard Dataverse</publisher><subject>Social Sciences</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1892</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.7910/dvn/frm1ic$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ternovski, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, Lilla</creatorcontrib><title>Replication Data for: A Note on Increases in Inattentive Online Survey-Takers Since 2020</title><description>Lucid, a popular source of online convenience survey samples, has seen a significant increase in inattentive respondents since 2020. Inattentive participants – respondents who incorrectly answer directed query attention check questions – may be introducing substantial measurement error and attenuation bias. Using data from 152,967 survey respondents across multiple studies conducted between January 2020 and June 2021, we find that inattentive respondents report less reliable demographic data, less stable responses, and are systematically different from attentive respondents. We find some evidence of attenuation bias and mixed evidence that data quality has decreased slightly since 2020 even after filtering for inattentive respondents. We conclude that researchers using Lucid should report if they screened on attentiveness and consider replicating any null results. Such an unexpected increase in inattentiveness in a widely-used platform suggests that future researchers relying on online convenience survey samples should continuously assess data quality.</description><subject>Social Sciences</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNotjz1rwzAURbV0KGmX_gLNBTeSLFl2tpB-BUIDjYdu4ll6AhFHDrJqyL-vQzpd7hku9xDyxNmLbjhbuikufTrxYO_Jzzee-2AhhyHSV8hA_ZBWdE2_hox0ZttoE8KIIw3XAjljzGFCuo99iEgPv2nCS9HCEdNIDyFapIIJ9kDuPPQjPv7ngrTvb-3ms9jtP7ab9a5wmttC1ZXshOel6ioB4LWVkuHMXF2qpu68lA3XApXoaqcbbxvwTIC3SonKelkuyPNt1s3fbchozimcIF0MZ-Zqa2Zbc7Mt_wBhnk74</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Ternovski, John</creator><creator>Orr, Lilla</creator><general>Harvard Dataverse</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Replication Data for: A Note on Increases in Inattentive Online Survey-Takers Since 2020</title><author>Ternovski, John ; Orr, Lilla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d71c-5864b2f135b62aaf7c440e64bd83598bf449172e52b8d79fc9af02afc5526cf43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ternovski, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, Lilla</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ternovski, John</au><au>Orr, Lilla</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Replication Data for: A Note on Increases in Inattentive Online Survey-Takers Since 2020</title><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>Lucid, a popular source of online convenience survey samples, has seen a significant increase in inattentive respondents since 2020. Inattentive participants – respondents who incorrectly answer directed query attention check questions – may be introducing substantial measurement error and attenuation bias. Using data from 152,967 survey respondents across multiple studies conducted between January 2020 and June 2021, we find that inattentive respondents report less reliable demographic data, less stable responses, and are systematically different from attentive respondents. We find some evidence of attenuation bias and mixed evidence that data quality has decreased slightly since 2020 even after filtering for inattentive respondents. We conclude that researchers using Lucid should report if they screened on attentiveness and consider replicating any null results. Such an unexpected increase in inattentiveness in a widely-used platform suggests that future researchers relying on online convenience survey samples should continuously assess data quality.</abstract><pub>Harvard Dataverse</pub><doi>10.7910/dvn/frm1ic</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.7910/dvn/frm1ic
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_7910_dvn_frm1ic
source DataCite
subjects Social Sciences
title Replication Data for: A Note on Increases in Inattentive Online Survey-Takers Since 2020
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A36%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Ternovski,%20John&rft.date=2022&rft_id=info:doi/10.7910/dvn/frm1ic&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_7910_dvn_frm1ic%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true