Replication Data for: Political Geography and Firm Strategies: How Electoral Competition Influences Local Job Creation

Among the many promises made by politicians to their constituents, job creation is universal. Do firms strategically use job creation to exert influence? We take this question to the universe of firms in the United States between 1997 and 2018, linking each subsidiary to a congressional district. We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Bisbee, James
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Bisbee, James
description Among the many promises made by politicians to their constituents, job creation is universal. Do firms strategically use job creation to exert influence? We take this question to the universe of firms in the United States between 1997 and 2018, linking each subsidiary to a congressional district. We find that firms open subsidiaries in more competitive districts, suggesting that firms employ politicians' constituents as a political strategy to build ties with vulnerable legislators. These patterns are also consistent with electorally insecure politicians exerting more effort to attract firms. Unlike other tools of political influence available to a firm, such as campaign contributions and lobbying, job creation is constrained by geography and time. We show that these patterns exist only for firms in geographically flexible industries, that local job creation increases a politician's electoral survival, and that subsidiary investments are correlated with longer tenures on valuable congressional committees.
doi_str_mv 10.7910/dvn/0tbfd4
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_7910_dvn_0tbfd4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_7910_dvn_0tbfd4</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d714-3a43d05f4ad9d2c5f2f9bb7b9e0e36af8c27f5fb735e12fe8478eadb13d1cea73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtOwzAQRb1hgQobvsBrpFA7TnDSHQp9oUgg6D4a2-NiyYkj1xT170lbViNdjc7VPYQ8cPYka87m5jjMWVLWFLfk-ImjdxqSCwN9hQTUhrigH8G7NMWerjHsI4zfJwqDoSsXe_qVIiTcOzws6Cb80qVHnUKcnpvQj5jcBbYdrP_BQeOBtuFMeguKNhEvVXfkxoI_4P3_nZHdarlrNln7vt42L21mJC8yAYUwrLQFmNrkurS5rZWSqkaG4hlspXNpS6ukKJHnFqtCVghGcWG4RpBiRh6vWDMt0y5hN0bXQzx1nHVnF93koru6EH_m8Fv1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Replication Data for: Political Geography and Firm Strategies: How Electoral Competition Influences Local Job Creation</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Bisbee, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Bisbee, James</creatorcontrib><description>Among the many promises made by politicians to their constituents, job creation is universal. Do firms strategically use job creation to exert influence? We take this question to the universe of firms in the United States between 1997 and 2018, linking each subsidiary to a congressional district. We find that firms open subsidiaries in more competitive districts, suggesting that firms employ politicians' constituents as a political strategy to build ties with vulnerable legislators. These patterns are also consistent with electorally insecure politicians exerting more effort to attract firms. Unlike other tools of political influence available to a firm, such as campaign contributions and lobbying, job creation is constrained by geography and time. We show that these patterns exist only for firms in geographically flexible industries, that local job creation increases a politician's electoral survival, and that subsidiary investments are correlated with longer tenures on valuable congressional committees.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.7910/dvn/0tbfd4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Harvard Dataverse</publisher><subject>Business Influence ; Electoral Competition ; Jobs ; Political Geography ; Social Sciences</subject><creationdate>2023</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-3334-2416</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1887</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.7910/dvn/0tbfd4$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bisbee, James</creatorcontrib><title>Replication Data for: Political Geography and Firm Strategies: How Electoral Competition Influences Local Job Creation</title><description>Among the many promises made by politicians to their constituents, job creation is universal. Do firms strategically use job creation to exert influence? We take this question to the universe of firms in the United States between 1997 and 2018, linking each subsidiary to a congressional district. We find that firms open subsidiaries in more competitive districts, suggesting that firms employ politicians' constituents as a political strategy to build ties with vulnerable legislators. These patterns are also consistent with electorally insecure politicians exerting more effort to attract firms. Unlike other tools of political influence available to a firm, such as campaign contributions and lobbying, job creation is constrained by geography and time. We show that these patterns exist only for firms in geographically flexible industries, that local job creation increases a politician's electoral survival, and that subsidiary investments are correlated with longer tenures on valuable congressional committees.</description><subject>Business Influence</subject><subject>Electoral Competition</subject><subject>Jobs</subject><subject>Political Geography</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNotkMtOwzAQRb1hgQobvsBrpFA7TnDSHQp9oUgg6D4a2-NiyYkj1xT170lbViNdjc7VPYQ8cPYka87m5jjMWVLWFLfk-ImjdxqSCwN9hQTUhrigH8G7NMWerjHsI4zfJwqDoSsXe_qVIiTcOzws6Cb80qVHnUKcnpvQj5jcBbYdrP_BQeOBtuFMeguKNhEvVXfkxoI_4P3_nZHdarlrNln7vt42L21mJC8yAYUwrLQFmNrkurS5rZWSqkaG4hlspXNpS6ukKJHnFqtCVghGcWG4RpBiRh6vWDMt0y5hN0bXQzx1nHVnF93koru6EH_m8Fv1</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Bisbee, James</creator><general>Harvard Dataverse</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3334-2416</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Replication Data for: Political Geography and Firm Strategies: How Electoral Competition Influences Local Job Creation</title><author>Bisbee, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d714-3a43d05f4ad9d2c5f2f9bb7b9e0e36af8c27f5fb735e12fe8478eadb13d1cea73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Business Influence</topic><topic>Electoral Competition</topic><topic>Jobs</topic><topic>Political Geography</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bisbee, James</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bisbee, James</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Replication Data for: Political Geography and Firm Strategies: How Electoral Competition Influences Local Job Creation</title><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><abstract>Among the many promises made by politicians to their constituents, job creation is universal. Do firms strategically use job creation to exert influence? We take this question to the universe of firms in the United States between 1997 and 2018, linking each subsidiary to a congressional district. We find that firms open subsidiaries in more competitive districts, suggesting that firms employ politicians' constituents as a political strategy to build ties with vulnerable legislators. These patterns are also consistent with electorally insecure politicians exerting more effort to attract firms. Unlike other tools of political influence available to a firm, such as campaign contributions and lobbying, job creation is constrained by geography and time. We show that these patterns exist only for firms in geographically flexible industries, that local job creation increases a politician's electoral survival, and that subsidiary investments are correlated with longer tenures on valuable congressional committees.</abstract><pub>Harvard Dataverse</pub><doi>10.7910/dvn/0tbfd4</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3334-2416</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.7910/dvn/0tbfd4
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_7910_dvn_0tbfd4
source DataCite
subjects Business Influence
Electoral Competition
Jobs
Political Geography
Social Sciences
title Replication Data for: Political Geography and Firm Strategies: How Electoral Competition Influences Local Job Creation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T22%3A15%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Bisbee,%20James&rft.date=2023&rft_id=info:doi/10.7910/dvn/0tbfd4&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_7910_dvn_0tbfd4%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true