An Investigation of the Unit Shear Strength of Geometrically Scaled Reinforced Concrete Beams

    This study examines the influence of beam size on the shear capacity of geometrically scaled reinforced concrete beams without web reinforcement. The experimental program included six 12-in. deep beams and two 30-in. deep beams. All components of the large beams were geometrica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Murray, Matthew, Pujol, Santiago
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Murray, Matthew
Pujol, Santiago
description     This study examines the influence of beam size on the shear capacity of geometrically scaled reinforced concrete beams without web reinforcement. The experimental program included six 12-in. deep beams and two 30-in. deep beams. All components of the large beams were geometrically scaled to have 2.5 times the dimensions of the small beams. The scaling included bar cover, bar spacing, and maximum aggregate size, as well as the overall beam span, width, and depth. Additionally, four of the small beams were cast using aggregate that had not been scaled to study the influence of aggregate size on the unit shear strength of beams of equal size. The specimens, each having a shear span to effective depth ratio of 2.3, were tested to failure under a concentrated load at midspan. The experimental results indicated that when all beam components were geometrically scaled in proportion to depth, beams of different sizes developed similar unit shear strengths, within 20% of one another. The ratio of aggregate size to beam size influenced unit shear strength to the extent that 12-in. deep beams containing 1-in. maximum aggregate size exhibited a unit shear strength that was 35% greater than the unit strength of specimens containing 1/2-in. aggregate.
doi_str_mv 10.7277/svac-1590
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_7277_svac_1590</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_7277_svac_1590</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_7277_svac_15903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjr0KwjAURrM4iDr4Bnd1qLaKBEct_q1WRwmX9LYNtIkkl0Lf3gZ8AafzwXeGI8QyS9dyK-Um9KiTbH9Ip-J9tHC3PQU2NbJxFlwF3BC8rGEoGkIPBXuyNTfxupLriL3R2LYDFCOohAcZWzmvx5k7qz0xwYmwC3MxqbANtPhxJlaX8zO_JSUyasOkPt506AeVpSqmqZimYtruH_cLQEJGqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>An Investigation of the Unit Shear Strength of Geometrically Scaled Reinforced Concrete Beams</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Murray, Matthew ; Pujol, Santiago</creator><creatorcontrib>Murray, Matthew ; Pujol, Santiago</creatorcontrib><description>&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; This study examines the influence of beam size on the shear capacity of geometrically scaled reinforced concrete beams without web reinforcement. The experimental program included six 12-in. deep beams and two 30-in. deep beams. All components of the large beams were geometrically scaled to have 2.5 times the dimensions of the small beams. The scaling included bar cover, bar spacing, and maximum aggregate size, as well as the overall beam span, width, and depth. Additionally, four of the small beams were cast using aggregate that had not been scaled to study the influence of aggregate size on the unit shear strength of beams of equal size. The specimens, each having a shear span to effective depth ratio of 2.3, were tested to failure under a concentrated load at midspan. The experimental results indicated that when all beam components were geometrically scaled in proportion to depth, beams of different sizes developed similar unit shear strengths, within 20% of one another. The ratio of aggregate size to beam size influenced unit shear strength to the extent that 12-in. deep beams containing 1-in. maximum aggregate size exhibited a unit shear strength that was 35% greater than the unit strength of specimens containing 1/2-in. aggregate. &lt;nb:citations&gt;&lt;/nb:citations&gt;</description><identifier>DOI: 10.7277/svac-1590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>DEEDSHub</publisher><creationdate>2017</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>777,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.7277/svac-1590$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murray, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pujol, Santiago</creatorcontrib><title>An Investigation of the Unit Shear Strength of Geometrically Scaled Reinforced Concrete Beams</title><description>&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; This study examines the influence of beam size on the shear capacity of geometrically scaled reinforced concrete beams without web reinforcement. The experimental program included six 12-in. deep beams and two 30-in. deep beams. All components of the large beams were geometrically scaled to have 2.5 times the dimensions of the small beams. The scaling included bar cover, bar spacing, and maximum aggregate size, as well as the overall beam span, width, and depth. Additionally, four of the small beams were cast using aggregate that had not been scaled to study the influence of aggregate size on the unit shear strength of beams of equal size. The specimens, each having a shear span to effective depth ratio of 2.3, were tested to failure under a concentrated load at midspan. The experimental results indicated that when all beam components were geometrically scaled in proportion to depth, beams of different sizes developed similar unit shear strengths, within 20% of one another. The ratio of aggregate size to beam size influenced unit shear strength to the extent that 12-in. deep beams containing 1-in. maximum aggregate size exhibited a unit shear strength that was 35% greater than the unit strength of specimens containing 1/2-in. aggregate. &lt;nb:citations&gt;&lt;/nb:citations&gt;</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjr0KwjAURrM4iDr4Bnd1qLaKBEct_q1WRwmX9LYNtIkkl0Lf3gZ8AafzwXeGI8QyS9dyK-Um9KiTbH9Ip-J9tHC3PQU2NbJxFlwF3BC8rGEoGkIPBXuyNTfxupLriL3R2LYDFCOohAcZWzmvx5k7qz0xwYmwC3MxqbANtPhxJlaX8zO_JSUyasOkPt506AeVpSqmqZimYtruH_cLQEJGqA</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Murray, Matthew</creator><creator>Pujol, Santiago</creator><general>DEEDSHub</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>An Investigation of the Unit Shear Strength of Geometrically Scaled Reinforced Concrete Beams</title><author>Murray, Matthew ; Pujol, Santiago</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_7277_svac_15903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murray, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pujol, Santiago</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murray, Matthew</au><au>Pujol, Santiago</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>An Investigation of the Unit Shear Strength of Geometrically Scaled Reinforced Concrete Beams</title><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><abstract>&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; This study examines the influence of beam size on the shear capacity of geometrically scaled reinforced concrete beams without web reinforcement. The experimental program included six 12-in. deep beams and two 30-in. deep beams. All components of the large beams were geometrically scaled to have 2.5 times the dimensions of the small beams. The scaling included bar cover, bar spacing, and maximum aggregate size, as well as the overall beam span, width, and depth. Additionally, four of the small beams were cast using aggregate that had not been scaled to study the influence of aggregate size on the unit shear strength of beams of equal size. The specimens, each having a shear span to effective depth ratio of 2.3, were tested to failure under a concentrated load at midspan. The experimental results indicated that when all beam components were geometrically scaled in proportion to depth, beams of different sizes developed similar unit shear strengths, within 20% of one another. The ratio of aggregate size to beam size influenced unit shear strength to the extent that 12-in. deep beams containing 1-in. maximum aggregate size exhibited a unit shear strength that was 35% greater than the unit strength of specimens containing 1/2-in. aggregate. &lt;nb:citations&gt;&lt;/nb:citations&gt;</abstract><pub>DEEDSHub</pub><doi>10.7277/svac-1590</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.7277/svac-1590
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_7277_svac_1590
source DataCite
title An Investigation of the Unit Shear Strength of Geometrically Scaled Reinforced Concrete Beams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A36%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Murray,%20Matthew&rft.date=2017&rft_id=info:doi/10.7277/svac-1590&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_7277_svac_1590%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true