Supplementary Material for: Lifestyle Interventions for Weight Management in People with Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis Exploring the Mediators and Moderators of Treatment Effects

Background: Serious mental illness (SMI) reduces life expectancy, primarily due to somatic comorbidity linked to obesity. Meta-analyses have found beneficial effects of lifestyle interventions in people with SMI and recommended their implementation to manage obesity. Objective: The objective of this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Speyer, H., Jakobsen, A.S., Westergaard, C., Nørgaard H.C.B., Pisinger, C., Krogh, J., Hjorthøj, C., Nordentoft, M., Gluud, C., Correll, C.U., Jørgensen, K.B.
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Speyer, H.
Jakobsen, A.S.
Westergaard, C.
Nørgaard H.C.B.
Pisinger, C.
Krogh, J.
Hjorthøj, C.
Nordentoft, M.
Gluud, C.
Correll, C.U.
Jørgensen, K.B.
description Background: Serious mental illness (SMI) reduces life expectancy, primarily due to somatic comorbidity linked to obesity. Meta-analyses have found beneficial effects of lifestyle interventions in people with SMI and recommended their implementation to manage obesity. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the benefits and harms of individualized lifestyle interventions for weight in people diagnosed with SMI and to explore potential mediators and moderators of the effect. Methods: The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42016049093). Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of individualized lifestyle interventions on weight management in people with SMI were included. Primary outcomes were differences in endpoint body mass index (BMI) and the proportion achieving clinically relevant weight loss (≥5%). Secondary outcomes included quality of life, cardiometabolic risk factors, and adverse effects. Results: We included 41 RCTs (n = 4,267). All trials were at high risk of bias according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The experimental interventions reduced the mean difference in BMI by –0.63 kg/m2 (95% confidence interval [CI] = –1.02 to –0.23; p = 0.002; I2 = 70.7%) compared to the control groups. At postintervention follow-up (17 RCTs), the effect size remained similar but was no longer significant (BMI = –0.63 kg/m2; 95% CI = –1.30 to 0.04; p = 0.07; I2 = 48.8%). The risk ratio for losing ≥5% of baseline weight was 1.51 (95% CI = 1.07–2.13; p = 0.02) compared to the control groups. GRADE showed very low or low quality of evidence. Conclusion: There is a statistically significant, but clinically insignificant, mean effect of individualized lifestyle interventions for weight reduction in people with SMI.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.9821342
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_9821342</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_9821342</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d892-ff45a75b45cbbea588fb8f9ff46151083b00c51a1b658c785a2d9560970140de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUV1PwjAUnQ8-GPQX-HJ_gGDHVuh4IwaVBKIBEh-Xu-12NOk6bAvKv7cw1Ke293zck54ouo_ZYMRE-thkA6lqt0VLg0wM4yQd3lzdrve7naaGjEd7hCV6sgo1yNZOYKEkOX_UBHMT5odAUq1xJxA-SNVbHwQG67MclIF3aoMZfCm_hXUwavcOlidrDXOtDTk3gSmsj85Tg16VsKKDoq9OsCSP_alBfXTKPcDmnGNNn_vT2nD9h9BUHXtFtQ2mIdQfCrPvnW6tMjX4LQVapdC31nWitiLbPVsZNhD6c_SZlFR6dxtdS9SO7i5nL9o8zzZPr_3F28v8abroVyIb9qVMOY55kfKyKAi5ELIQMgvjUcxjJpKCsZLHGBcjLsqx4DisMj5i2ZjFKaso6UVJZ1uhx1J5yndWNeH785jlp6ryJst_q8ovVSU_BGWWwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Supplementary Material for: Lifestyle Interventions for Weight Management in People with Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis Exploring the Mediators and Moderators of Treatment Effects</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Speyer, H. ; Jakobsen, A.S. ; Westergaard, C. ; Nørgaard H.C.B. ; Pisinger, C. ; Krogh, J. ; Hjorthøj, C. ; Nordentoft, M. ; Gluud, C. ; Correll, C.U. ; Jørgensen, K.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Speyer, H. ; Jakobsen, A.S. ; Westergaard, C. ; Nørgaard H.C.B. ; Pisinger, C. ; Krogh, J. ; Hjorthøj, C. ; Nordentoft, M. ; Gluud, C. ; Correll, C.U. ; Jørgensen, K.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Serious mental illness (SMI) reduces life expectancy, primarily due to somatic comorbidity linked to obesity. Meta-analyses have found beneficial effects of lifestyle interventions in people with SMI and recommended their implementation to manage obesity. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the benefits and harms of individualized lifestyle interventions for weight in people diagnosed with SMI and to explore potential mediators and moderators of the effect. Methods: The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42016049093). Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of individualized lifestyle interventions on weight management in people with SMI were included. Primary outcomes were differences in endpoint body mass index (BMI) and the proportion achieving clinically relevant weight loss (≥5%). Secondary outcomes included quality of life, cardiometabolic risk factors, and adverse effects. Results: We included 41 RCTs (n = 4,267). All trials were at high risk of bias according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The experimental interventions reduced the mean difference in BMI by –0.63 kg/m2 (95% confidence interval [CI] = –1.02 to –0.23; p = 0.002; I2 = 70.7%) compared to the control groups. At postintervention follow-up (17 RCTs), the effect size remained similar but was no longer significant (BMI = –0.63 kg/m2; 95% CI = –1.30 to 0.04; p = 0.07; I2 = 48.8%). The risk ratio for losing ≥5% of baseline weight was 1.51 (95% CI = 1.07–2.13; p = 0.02) compared to the control groups. GRADE showed very low or low quality of evidence. Conclusion: There is a statistically significant, but clinically insignificant, mean effect of individualized lifestyle interventions for weight reduction in people with SMI.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9821342</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Karger Publishers</publisher><subject>Medicine</subject><creationdate>2019</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9821342$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Speyer, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, A.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westergaard, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nørgaard H.C.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisinger, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krogh, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hjorthøj, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordentoft, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gluud, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correll, C.U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, K.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Supplementary Material for: Lifestyle Interventions for Weight Management in People with Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis Exploring the Mediators and Moderators of Treatment Effects</title><description>Background: Serious mental illness (SMI) reduces life expectancy, primarily due to somatic comorbidity linked to obesity. Meta-analyses have found beneficial effects of lifestyle interventions in people with SMI and recommended their implementation to manage obesity. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the benefits and harms of individualized lifestyle interventions for weight in people diagnosed with SMI and to explore potential mediators and moderators of the effect. Methods: The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42016049093). Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of individualized lifestyle interventions on weight management in people with SMI were included. Primary outcomes were differences in endpoint body mass index (BMI) and the proportion achieving clinically relevant weight loss (≥5%). Secondary outcomes included quality of life, cardiometabolic risk factors, and adverse effects. Results: We included 41 RCTs (n = 4,267). All trials were at high risk of bias according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The experimental interventions reduced the mean difference in BMI by –0.63 kg/m2 (95% confidence interval [CI] = –1.02 to –0.23; p = 0.002; I2 = 70.7%) compared to the control groups. At postintervention follow-up (17 RCTs), the effect size remained similar but was no longer significant (BMI = –0.63 kg/m2; 95% CI = –1.30 to 0.04; p = 0.07; I2 = 48.8%). The risk ratio for losing ≥5% of baseline weight was 1.51 (95% CI = 1.07–2.13; p = 0.02) compared to the control groups. GRADE showed very low or low quality of evidence. Conclusion: There is a statistically significant, but clinically insignificant, mean effect of individualized lifestyle interventions for weight reduction in people with SMI.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUV1PwjAUnQ8-GPQX-HJ_gGDHVuh4IwaVBKIBEh-Xu-12NOk6bAvKv7cw1Ke293zck54ouo_ZYMRE-thkA6lqt0VLg0wM4yQd3lzdrve7naaGjEd7hCV6sgo1yNZOYKEkOX_UBHMT5odAUq1xJxA-SNVbHwQG67MclIF3aoMZfCm_hXUwavcOlidrDXOtDTk3gSmsj85Tg16VsKKDoq9OsCSP_alBfXTKPcDmnGNNn_vT2nD9h9BUHXtFtQ2mIdQfCrPvnW6tMjX4LQVapdC31nWitiLbPVsZNhD6c_SZlFR6dxtdS9SO7i5nL9o8zzZPr_3F28v8abroVyIb9qVMOY55kfKyKAi5ELIQMgvjUcxjJpKCsZLHGBcjLsqx4DisMj5i2ZjFKaso6UVJZ1uhx1J5yndWNeH785jlp6ryJst_q8ovVSU_BGWWwg</recordid><startdate>20190913</startdate><enddate>20190913</enddate><creator>Speyer, H.</creator><creator>Jakobsen, A.S.</creator><creator>Westergaard, C.</creator><creator>Nørgaard H.C.B.</creator><creator>Pisinger, C.</creator><creator>Krogh, J.</creator><creator>Hjorthøj, C.</creator><creator>Nordentoft, M.</creator><creator>Gluud, C.</creator><creator>Correll, C.U.</creator><creator>Jørgensen, K.B.</creator><general>Karger Publishers</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190913</creationdate><title>Supplementary Material for: Lifestyle Interventions for Weight Management in People with Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis Exploring the Mediators and Moderators of Treatment Effects</title><author>Speyer, H. ; Jakobsen, A.S. ; Westergaard, C. ; Nørgaard H.C.B. ; Pisinger, C. ; Krogh, J. ; Hjorthøj, C. ; Nordentoft, M. ; Gluud, C. ; Correll, C.U. ; Jørgensen, K.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d892-ff45a75b45cbbea588fb8f9ff46151083b00c51a1b658c785a2d9560970140de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Speyer, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, A.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westergaard, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nørgaard H.C.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisinger, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krogh, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hjorthøj, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordentoft, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gluud, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correll, C.U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, K.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Speyer, H.</au><au>Jakobsen, A.S.</au><au>Westergaard, C.</au><au>Nørgaard H.C.B.</au><au>Pisinger, C.</au><au>Krogh, J.</au><au>Hjorthøj, C.</au><au>Nordentoft, M.</au><au>Gluud, C.</au><au>Correll, C.U.</au><au>Jørgensen, K.B.</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Supplementary Material for: Lifestyle Interventions for Weight Management in People with Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis Exploring the Mediators and Moderators of Treatment Effects</title><date>2019-09-13</date><risdate>2019</risdate><abstract>Background: Serious mental illness (SMI) reduces life expectancy, primarily due to somatic comorbidity linked to obesity. Meta-analyses have found beneficial effects of lifestyle interventions in people with SMI and recommended their implementation to manage obesity. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the benefits and harms of individualized lifestyle interventions for weight in people diagnosed with SMI and to explore potential mediators and moderators of the effect. Methods: The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42016049093). Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of individualized lifestyle interventions on weight management in people with SMI were included. Primary outcomes were differences in endpoint body mass index (BMI) and the proportion achieving clinically relevant weight loss (≥5%). Secondary outcomes included quality of life, cardiometabolic risk factors, and adverse effects. Results: We included 41 RCTs (n = 4,267). All trials were at high risk of bias according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The experimental interventions reduced the mean difference in BMI by –0.63 kg/m2 (95% confidence interval [CI] = –1.02 to –0.23; p = 0.002; I2 = 70.7%) compared to the control groups. At postintervention follow-up (17 RCTs), the effect size remained similar but was no longer significant (BMI = –0.63 kg/m2; 95% CI = –1.30 to 0.04; p = 0.07; I2 = 48.8%). The risk ratio for losing ≥5% of baseline weight was 1.51 (95% CI = 1.07–2.13; p = 0.02) compared to the control groups. GRADE showed very low or low quality of evidence. Conclusion: There is a statistically significant, but clinically insignificant, mean effect of individualized lifestyle interventions for weight reduction in people with SMI.</abstract><pub>Karger Publishers</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.9821342</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9821342
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_9821342
source DataCite
subjects Medicine
title Supplementary Material for: Lifestyle Interventions for Weight Management in People with Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis Exploring the Mediators and Moderators of Treatment Effects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T21%3A12%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Speyer,%20H.&rft.date=2019-09-13&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.9821342&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_9821342%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true