Analyzing the Students’ Perception of UML Diagrams: Instruments Used in Evaluation
Unified Modeling Language (UML) has been adopted as a standard modeling language in the software industry for the graphical representation of analysis and design models. Due to its importance, UML is taught in most undergraduate majors in Software Engineering and Computing. However, little is known...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Damian, Adriana Tayana Conte Steinmacher, Igor |
description | Unified Modeling Language (UML) has been adopted as a standard modeling language in the software industry for the graphical representation of analysis and design models. Due to its importance, UML is taught in most undergraduate majors in Software Engineering and Computing. However, little is known about the students’ perception regarding the UML diagrams. We conducted an exploratory study to investigate the students’ perception regarding UML diagrams acceptance. In this study, we investigated five UML diagrams taught for the undergraduate students from Federal University of Amazonas. These UML diagrams are: class diagrams, use case diagrams (and specifications), sequence diagrams, state machine diagrams, and activity diagrams. In order to evaluate the perceptions of senior undergraduate students on UML diagrams and thus help instructors improving the teaching of its importance, we applied Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaires. This technical report presents the TAM questionnaires for each UML diagram. Thus, other researchers may replicate it, providing outcomes in different contexts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.6084/m9.figshare.9118949 |
format | Dataset |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_9118949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_9118949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d899-86887e9cfefaa4aefaa995c4c0c5a9b4f61403e8d1ed86187efc08860a4aa2e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1zzFOwzAUxnEvDKhwAhZfIMEmbmqzVaVApVYgkc7Ww35OLSVuZTtIZeIaXI-T0IiyvLf89El_Qm44K2smxW2vSufbtIOIpeJcKqEuSTMP0B0_fWhp3iF9y4PFkNPP1zd9xWjwkP0-0L2j282aPnhoI_Tpnq5CynHoR0q3CS31gS4_oBtg9FfkwkGX8Pr8J6R5XDaL52L98rRazNeFlUoVspZyhso4dAACxqvU1AjDzBTUu3A1F6xCaTlaWfOTdYZJWbMThjucVRNS_c1ayGB8Rn2Ivod41JzpMVn3Sv8n63Ny9Qs391Up</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Analyzing the Students’ Perception of UML Diagrams: Instruments Used in Evaluation</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Damian, Adriana ; Tayana Conte ; Steinmacher, Igor</creator><creatorcontrib>Damian, Adriana ; Tayana Conte ; Steinmacher, Igor</creatorcontrib><description>Unified Modeling Language (UML) has been adopted as a standard modeling language in the software industry for the graphical representation of analysis and design models. Due to its importance, UML is taught in most undergraduate majors in Software Engineering and Computing. However, little is known about the students’ perception regarding the UML diagrams. We conducted an exploratory study to investigate the students’ perception regarding UML diagrams acceptance. In this study, we investigated five UML diagrams taught for the undergraduate students from Federal University of Amazonas. These UML diagrams are: class diagrams, use case diagrams (and specifications), sequence diagrams, state machine diagrams, and activity diagrams. In order to evaluate the perceptions of senior undergraduate students on UML diagrams and thus help instructors improving the teaching of its importance, we applied Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaires. This technical report presents the TAM questionnaires for each UML diagram. Thus, other researchers may replicate it, providing outcomes in different contexts.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9118949</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Figshare</publisher><subject>FOS: Computer and information sciences ; Software Engineering</subject><creationdate>2019</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1894</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9118949$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Damian, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tayana Conte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinmacher, Igor</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing the Students’ Perception of UML Diagrams: Instruments Used in Evaluation</title><description>Unified Modeling Language (UML) has been adopted as a standard modeling language in the software industry for the graphical representation of analysis and design models. Due to its importance, UML is taught in most undergraduate majors in Software Engineering and Computing. However, little is known about the students’ perception regarding the UML diagrams. We conducted an exploratory study to investigate the students’ perception regarding UML diagrams acceptance. In this study, we investigated five UML diagrams taught for the undergraduate students from Federal University of Amazonas. These UML diagrams are: class diagrams, use case diagrams (and specifications), sequence diagrams, state machine diagrams, and activity diagrams. In order to evaluate the perceptions of senior undergraduate students on UML diagrams and thus help instructors improving the teaching of its importance, we applied Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaires. This technical report presents the TAM questionnaires for each UML diagram. Thus, other researchers may replicate it, providing outcomes in different contexts.</description><subject>FOS: Computer and information sciences</subject><subject>Software Engineering</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1zzFOwzAUxnEvDKhwAhZfIMEmbmqzVaVApVYgkc7Ww35OLSVuZTtIZeIaXI-T0IiyvLf89El_Qm44K2smxW2vSufbtIOIpeJcKqEuSTMP0B0_fWhp3iF9y4PFkNPP1zd9xWjwkP0-0L2j282aPnhoI_Tpnq5CynHoR0q3CS31gS4_oBtg9FfkwkGX8Pr8J6R5XDaL52L98rRazNeFlUoVspZyhso4dAACxqvU1AjDzBTUu3A1F6xCaTlaWfOTdYZJWbMThjucVRNS_c1ayGB8Rn2Ivod41JzpMVn3Sv8n63Ny9Qs391Up</recordid><startdate>20190726</startdate><enddate>20190726</enddate><creator>Damian, Adriana</creator><creator>Tayana Conte</creator><creator>Steinmacher, Igor</creator><general>Figshare</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190726</creationdate><title>Analyzing the Students’ Perception of UML Diagrams: Instruments Used in Evaluation</title><author>Damian, Adriana ; Tayana Conte ; Steinmacher, Igor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d899-86887e9cfefaa4aefaa995c4c0c5a9b4f61403e8d1ed86187efc08860a4aa2e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>FOS: Computer and information sciences</topic><topic>Software Engineering</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Damian, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tayana Conte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinmacher, Igor</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Damian, Adriana</au><au>Tayana Conte</au><au>Steinmacher, Igor</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Analyzing the Students’ Perception of UML Diagrams: Instruments Used in Evaluation</title><date>2019-07-26</date><risdate>2019</risdate><abstract>Unified Modeling Language (UML) has been adopted as a standard modeling language in the software industry for the graphical representation of analysis and design models. Due to its importance, UML is taught in most undergraduate majors in Software Engineering and Computing. However, little is known about the students’ perception regarding the UML diagrams. We conducted an exploratory study to investigate the students’ perception regarding UML diagrams acceptance. In this study, we investigated five UML diagrams taught for the undergraduate students from Federal University of Amazonas. These UML diagrams are: class diagrams, use case diagrams (and specifications), sequence diagrams, state machine diagrams, and activity diagrams. In order to evaluate the perceptions of senior undergraduate students on UML diagrams and thus help instructors improving the teaching of its importance, we applied Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaires. This technical report presents the TAM questionnaires for each UML diagram. Thus, other researchers may replicate it, providing outcomes in different contexts.</abstract><pub>Figshare</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.9118949</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9118949 |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_9118949 |
source | DataCite |
subjects | FOS: Computer and information sciences Software Engineering |
title | Analyzing the Students’ Perception of UML Diagrams: Instruments Used in Evaluation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A33%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Damian,%20Adriana&rft.date=2019-07-26&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.9118949&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_9118949%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |