COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERIMENTAL AND SIMULATED RESULTS OF BIODIESEL PRODUCTION BY REACTIVE DISTILLATION AND ENERGETIC ASSESSMENT

ABSTRACT Biodiesel appears to be a likely substitute to conventional diesel. However, the main challenge has been the creation of a competitive advantage for the biodiesel production process in terms of innovation and efficiency. The reactive distillation technique for biodiesel production is possib...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ronaldy J. M. C. L. Silva, Tschoeke, Isabelle C. P., Melo, James C., Josivan P. Silva, Pacheco, Jose G. A., Silva, José M. F., Thibério P. C. Souza
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Ronaldy J. M. C. L. Silva
Tschoeke, Isabelle C. P.
Melo, James C.
Josivan P. Silva
Pacheco, Jose G. A.
Silva, José M. F.
Thibério P. C. Souza
description ABSTRACT Biodiesel appears to be a likely substitute to conventional diesel. However, the main challenge has been the creation of a competitive advantage for the biodiesel production process in terms of innovation and efficiency. The reactive distillation technique for biodiesel production is possibly a key force to overcome this technological issue because it combines chemical reaction and the separation process inside the same unit. This work presents kinetic data for biodiesel production via the ethylic route and compare them with the methylic one. It also compares experimental results in a 1.5m reactive distillation pilot plant with simulated ones in ASPEN PLUS for ethylic biodiesel production with a molar ratio 6/1 (alcohol/oil). Kinetic parameters obtained for the ethylic study were ko = 8173dm3/(mol.min) and Ea =27.48 kJ/mol. Indeed, at the bottom of a six stage column overall the ethylic and methylic biodiesel accounted for 60.1% and 67.8%, respectively. Following this, a sensitivity analysis considering 20 stages of equilibrium showed an ester conversion above 97%. The total energy required to produce biodiesel via a conventional batch reactor was 1210W/h for the ethylic route and 2430 W/h for methylic one, while it amounted to approximately 1000W/h for both routes in the reactive distillation process.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.8986994
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_8986994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_8986994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d894-68a6f0d4e4683e62c4021ffd6dbc1c985cc38e9fc0a136f3ef0ba4d1950e13ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMtOwzAQRbNhgQpfwMY_0GDXrmUv3WRaLLlJFLs8VpHrB0SiEmq7YcWv04iymivNzLnSKYoHgkuOBXs8yDKP76cPf0ylkIJLyW6Ln6rddqrXtm3QCtwLQIPgtYNeb6FxyiDV1Mjq7c4oBzXqwe6Ms6hdo5Vuaw0WDOr6tt5VTk-It8uJuuRnQLW2TpvL37SYMNBAvwGnK6SsBWunhrviJvvPU7q_zlnh1uCqp7lpN7pSZh6FZHMuPM84ssS4oIkvAsMLknPkcR9IkGIZAhVJ5oA9oTzTlPHes0jkEidCfaSzgv5hoz_7MJ7T8HUcD_74PRA8THaGgxz-7QxXO_QX8HZYRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERIMENTAL AND SIMULATED RESULTS OF BIODIESEL PRODUCTION BY REACTIVE DISTILLATION AND ENERGETIC ASSESSMENT</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Ronaldy J. M. C. L. Silva ; Tschoeke, Isabelle C. P. ; Melo, James C. ; Josivan P. Silva ; Pacheco, Jose G. A. ; Silva, José M. F. ; Thibério P. C. Souza</creator><creatorcontrib>Ronaldy J. M. C. L. Silva ; Tschoeke, Isabelle C. P. ; Melo, James C. ; Josivan P. Silva ; Pacheco, Jose G. A. ; Silva, José M. F. ; Thibério P. C. Souza</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Biodiesel appears to be a likely substitute to conventional diesel. However, the main challenge has been the creation of a competitive advantage for the biodiesel production process in terms of innovation and efficiency. The reactive distillation technique for biodiesel production is possibly a key force to overcome this technological issue because it combines chemical reaction and the separation process inside the same unit. This work presents kinetic data for biodiesel production via the ethylic route and compare them with the methylic one. It also compares experimental results in a 1.5m reactive distillation pilot plant with simulated ones in ASPEN PLUS for ethylic biodiesel production with a molar ratio 6/1 (alcohol/oil). Kinetic parameters obtained for the ethylic study were ko = 8173dm3/(mol.min) and Ea =27.48 kJ/mol. Indeed, at the bottom of a six stage column overall the ethylic and methylic biodiesel accounted for 60.1% and 67.8%, respectively. Following this, a sensitivity analysis considering 20 stages of equilibrium showed an ester conversion above 97%. The total energy required to produce biodiesel via a conventional batch reactor was 1210W/h for the ethylic route and 2430 W/h for methylic one, while it amounted to approximately 1000W/h for both routes in the reactive distillation process.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8986994</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>Chemical Engineering not elsewhere classified ; FOS: Chemical engineering</subject><creationdate>2019</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1887</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8986994$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ronaldy J. M. C. L. Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschoeke, Isabelle C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, James C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josivan P. Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacheco, Jose G. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, José M. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thibério P. C. Souza</creatorcontrib><title>COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERIMENTAL AND SIMULATED RESULTS OF BIODIESEL PRODUCTION BY REACTIVE DISTILLATION AND ENERGETIC ASSESSMENT</title><description>ABSTRACT Biodiesel appears to be a likely substitute to conventional diesel. However, the main challenge has been the creation of a competitive advantage for the biodiesel production process in terms of innovation and efficiency. The reactive distillation technique for biodiesel production is possibly a key force to overcome this technological issue because it combines chemical reaction and the separation process inside the same unit. This work presents kinetic data for biodiesel production via the ethylic route and compare them with the methylic one. It also compares experimental results in a 1.5m reactive distillation pilot plant with simulated ones in ASPEN PLUS for ethylic biodiesel production with a molar ratio 6/1 (alcohol/oil). Kinetic parameters obtained for the ethylic study were ko = 8173dm3/(mol.min) and Ea =27.48 kJ/mol. Indeed, at the bottom of a six stage column overall the ethylic and methylic biodiesel accounted for 60.1% and 67.8%, respectively. Following this, a sensitivity analysis considering 20 stages of equilibrium showed an ester conversion above 97%. The total energy required to produce biodiesel via a conventional batch reactor was 1210W/h for the ethylic route and 2430 W/h for methylic one, while it amounted to approximately 1000W/h for both routes in the reactive distillation process.</description><subject>Chemical Engineering not elsewhere classified</subject><subject>FOS: Chemical engineering</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMtOwzAQRbNhgQpfwMY_0GDXrmUv3WRaLLlJFLs8VpHrB0SiEmq7YcWv04iymivNzLnSKYoHgkuOBXs8yDKP76cPf0ylkIJLyW6Ln6rddqrXtm3QCtwLQIPgtYNeb6FxyiDV1Mjq7c4oBzXqwe6Ms6hdo5Vuaw0WDOr6tt5VTk-It8uJuuRnQLW2TpvL37SYMNBAvwGnK6SsBWunhrviJvvPU7q_zlnh1uCqp7lpN7pSZh6FZHMuPM84ssS4oIkvAsMLknPkcR9IkGIZAhVJ5oA9oTzTlPHes0jkEidCfaSzgv5hoz_7MJ7T8HUcD_74PRA8THaGgxz-7QxXO_QX8HZYRQ</recordid><startdate>20190724</startdate><enddate>20190724</enddate><creator>Ronaldy J. M. C. L. Silva</creator><creator>Tschoeke, Isabelle C. P.</creator><creator>Melo, James C.</creator><creator>Josivan P. Silva</creator><creator>Pacheco, Jose G. A.</creator><creator>Silva, José M. F.</creator><creator>Thibério P. C. Souza</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190724</creationdate><title>COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERIMENTAL AND SIMULATED RESULTS OF BIODIESEL PRODUCTION BY REACTIVE DISTILLATION AND ENERGETIC ASSESSMENT</title><author>Ronaldy J. M. C. L. Silva ; Tschoeke, Isabelle C. P. ; Melo, James C. ; Josivan P. Silva ; Pacheco, Jose G. A. ; Silva, José M. F. ; Thibério P. C. Souza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d894-68a6f0d4e4683e62c4021ffd6dbc1c985cc38e9fc0a136f3ef0ba4d1950e13ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Chemical Engineering not elsewhere classified</topic><topic>FOS: Chemical engineering</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ronaldy J. M. C. L. Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschoeke, Isabelle C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, James C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josivan P. Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacheco, Jose G. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, José M. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thibério P. C. Souza</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ronaldy J. M. C. L. Silva</au><au>Tschoeke, Isabelle C. P.</au><au>Melo, James C.</au><au>Josivan P. Silva</au><au>Pacheco, Jose G. A.</au><au>Silva, José M. F.</au><au>Thibério P. C. Souza</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERIMENTAL AND SIMULATED RESULTS OF BIODIESEL PRODUCTION BY REACTIVE DISTILLATION AND ENERGETIC ASSESSMENT</title><date>2019-07-24</date><risdate>2019</risdate><abstract>ABSTRACT Biodiesel appears to be a likely substitute to conventional diesel. However, the main challenge has been the creation of a competitive advantage for the biodiesel production process in terms of innovation and efficiency. The reactive distillation technique for biodiesel production is possibly a key force to overcome this technological issue because it combines chemical reaction and the separation process inside the same unit. This work presents kinetic data for biodiesel production via the ethylic route and compare them with the methylic one. It also compares experimental results in a 1.5m reactive distillation pilot plant with simulated ones in ASPEN PLUS for ethylic biodiesel production with a molar ratio 6/1 (alcohol/oil). Kinetic parameters obtained for the ethylic study were ko = 8173dm3/(mol.min) and Ea =27.48 kJ/mol. Indeed, at the bottom of a six stage column overall the ethylic and methylic biodiesel accounted for 60.1% and 67.8%, respectively. Following this, a sensitivity analysis considering 20 stages of equilibrium showed an ester conversion above 97%. The total energy required to produce biodiesel via a conventional batch reactor was 1210W/h for the ethylic route and 2430 W/h for methylic one, while it amounted to approximately 1000W/h for both routes in the reactive distillation process.</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.8986994</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8986994
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_8986994
source DataCite
subjects Chemical Engineering not elsewhere classified
FOS: Chemical engineering
title COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERIMENTAL AND SIMULATED RESULTS OF BIODIESEL PRODUCTION BY REACTIVE DISTILLATION AND ENERGETIC ASSESSMENT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T07%3A17%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Ronaldy%20J.%20M.%20C.%20L.%20Silva&rft.date=2019-07-24&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.8986994&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_8986994%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true