Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial-1

Copyright information:Taken from "Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial"http://ww...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: M T Dyer, KA Goldsmith, SN Khan, LD Sharples, C Freeman, I Hardy, MJ Buxton, PM Schofield
Format: Bild
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator M T Dyer
KA Goldsmith
SN Khan
LD Sharples
C Freeman
I Hardy
MJ Buxton
PM Schofield
description Copyright information:Taken from "Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial"http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/9/1/40Trials 2008;9():40-40.Published online 30 Jun 2008PMCID:PMC2481243.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.85443
format Image
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_85443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_85443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_854433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkLFOw0AMhrMwIOAB2DxSqSmNWlDLGoFYkKo2e-RenNbS5S6yL0V5c0ZcKC_AZP-Wv9_Wn2X3xXz2PF8tH7v1rOWDHlFotnpaLhfX2VfpObBDDxgacFFTTm1LLvGJAqnaGP2orBBb6yH2FMDjnvwUlMPBU-4oJKEpiDnEjpUaSMLmaIT2bLz5SgOauBs8Jo4BHnblbgInEh0UehI3JAwUTXRjdCjNmfeoJCB0QnUGCusF3nxsJ8ABetN2XOGT09EWW0GXooz26MHumvFZsr5AdSTYbXjL1e9veXGbXbXole4u9SYr3l6r8j1vMKHjRHUv3KGMdTGvz-nV3br-S6_-SW_xH-YbDROI4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>image</recordtype></control><display><type>image</type><title>Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial-1</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>M T Dyer ; KA Goldsmith ; SN Khan ; LD Sharples ; C Freeman ; I Hardy ; MJ Buxton ; PM Schofield</creator><creatorcontrib>M T Dyer ; KA Goldsmith ; SN Khan ; LD Sharples ; C Freeman ; I Hardy ; MJ Buxton ; PM Schofield</creatorcontrib><description>Copyright information:Taken from "Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial"http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/9/1/40Trials 2008;9():40-40.Published online 30 Jun 2008PMCID:PMC2481243.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.85443</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>figshare</publisher><subject>Medicine</subject><creationdate>2011</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.85443$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>M T Dyer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KA Goldsmith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SN Khan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LD Sharples</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>C Freeman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>I Hardy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MJ Buxton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PM Schofield</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial-1</title><description>Copyright information:Taken from "Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial"http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/9/1/40Trials 2008;9():40-40.Published online 30 Jun 2008PMCID:PMC2481243.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>image</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>image</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkLFOw0AMhrMwIOAB2DxSqSmNWlDLGoFYkKo2e-RenNbS5S6yL0V5c0ZcKC_AZP-Wv9_Wn2X3xXz2PF8tH7v1rOWDHlFotnpaLhfX2VfpObBDDxgacFFTTm1LLvGJAqnaGP2orBBb6yH2FMDjnvwUlMPBU-4oJKEpiDnEjpUaSMLmaIT2bLz5SgOauBs8Jo4BHnblbgInEh0UehI3JAwUTXRjdCjNmfeoJCB0QnUGCusF3nxsJ8ABetN2XOGT09EWW0GXooz26MHumvFZsr5AdSTYbXjL1e9veXGbXbXole4u9SYr3l6r8j1vMKHjRHUv3KGMdTGvz-nV3br-S6_-SW_xH-YbDROI4g</recordid><startdate>20111231</startdate><enddate>20111231</enddate><creator>M T Dyer</creator><creator>KA Goldsmith</creator><creator>SN Khan</creator><creator>LD Sharples</creator><creator>C Freeman</creator><creator>I Hardy</creator><creator>MJ Buxton</creator><creator>PM Schofield</creator><general>figshare</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111231</creationdate><title>Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial-1</title><author>M T Dyer ; KA Goldsmith ; SN Khan ; LD Sharples ; C Freeman ; I Hardy ; MJ Buxton ; PM Schofield</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_854433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>images</rsrctype><prefilter>images</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>M T Dyer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KA Goldsmith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SN Khan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LD Sharples</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>C Freeman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>I Hardy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MJ Buxton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PM Schofield</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>M T Dyer</au><au>KA Goldsmith</au><au>SN Khan</au><au>LD Sharples</au><au>C Freeman</au><au>I Hardy</au><au>MJ Buxton</au><au>PM Schofield</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><title>Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial-1</title><date>2011-12-31</date><risdate>2011</risdate><abstract>Copyright information:Taken from "Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial"http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/9/1/40Trials 2008;9():40-40.Published online 30 Jun 2008PMCID:PMC2481243.</abstract><pub>figshare</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.85443</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.85443
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_85443
source DataCite
subjects Medicine
title Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial-1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A32%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=M%20T%20Dyer&rft.date=2011-12-31&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.85443&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_85443%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true