Bioethics and medical students: teaching method transition
Abstract Active methodologies has proven to be the best alternative for medical education. However, there no research, in the literature, comparing its use in teaching ethics and bioethics. Therefore, this study seeks to compare the knowledge of medical students from two different types of teaching...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Dataset |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Richaele De Sousa Teixeira Silva, Rodrigo Lemos Da Silva, Luigi Ferreira E Thaynnar Laryssa Kizan Da Silva Miranda Teixeira, Renan Kleber Costa Silva, José Antônio Cordero Da |
| description | Abstract Active methodologies has proven to be the best alternative for medical education. However, there no research, in the literature, comparing its use in teaching ethics and bioethics. Therefore, this study seeks to compare the knowledge of medical students from two different types of teaching (traditional and active) regarding the Code of Medical Ethics. The type of teaching methodology did not show impact on the degree of reading or knowledge of the Code of Medical Ethics, in addition both types of students believed to present the same degree of knowledge. However, students of the active methodology gave more importance to the bioethics and medical ethics discipline and presented greater knowledge on one of the questions concerning the standardization of the Code of Medical Ethics. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.6084/m9.figshare.7941833 |
| format | Dataset |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_7941833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_7941833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d893-b7b1d2d4f8fe67809fe0f1ea075cf1ee1ded6b2e3125fb50967d165c2c965cd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j71qwzAURrVkKEmfoItewK5k2ZKVrQ39g0CW7OJa9yoWxHKx1KFvX5emy3eGDw4cxh6kqLXo28fJ1iFe8ggL1ca2slfqju2f40xljD5zSMgnwujhynP5Qkol73kh8GNMl_Uq44y8LJByLHFOO7YJcM10f-OWnV9fzof36nh6-zg8HSvsraoGM0hssA19IG16YQOJIAmE6fxKkkioh4aUbLowdMJqg1J3vvF2XWzVlqk_LUIBHwu5zyVOsHw7KdxvmJus-w9ztzD1A1pGSvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Bioethics and medical students: teaching method transition</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Richaele De Sousa Teixeira ; Silva, Rodrigo Lemos Da ; Silva, Luigi Ferreira E ; Thaynnar Laryssa Kizan Da Silva Miranda ; Teixeira, Renan Kleber Costa ; Silva, José Antônio Cordero Da</creator><creatorcontrib>Richaele De Sousa Teixeira ; Silva, Rodrigo Lemos Da ; Silva, Luigi Ferreira E ; Thaynnar Laryssa Kizan Da Silva Miranda ; Teixeira, Renan Kleber Costa ; Silva, José Antônio Cordero Da</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Active methodologies has proven to be the best alternative for medical education. However, there no research, in the literature, comparing its use in teaching ethics and bioethics. Therefore, this study seeks to compare the knowledge of medical students from two different types of teaching (traditional and active) regarding the Code of Medical Ethics. The type of teaching methodology did not show impact on the degree of reading or knowledge of the Code of Medical Ethics, in addition both types of students believed to present the same degree of knowledge. However, students of the active methodology gave more importance to the bioethics and medical ethics discipline and presented greater knowledge on one of the questions concerning the standardization of the Code of Medical Ethics.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7941833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>FOS: Other medical sciences ; FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion ; Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified ; Philosophy</subject><creationdate>2019</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1892</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7941833$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richaele De Sousa Teixeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Rodrigo Lemos Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Luigi Ferreira E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thaynnar Laryssa Kizan Da Silva Miranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Renan Kleber Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, José Antônio Cordero Da</creatorcontrib><title>Bioethics and medical students: teaching method transition</title><description>Abstract Active methodologies has proven to be the best alternative for medical education. However, there no research, in the literature, comparing its use in teaching ethics and bioethics. Therefore, this study seeks to compare the knowledge of medical students from two different types of teaching (traditional and active) regarding the Code of Medical Ethics. The type of teaching methodology did not show impact on the degree of reading or knowledge of the Code of Medical Ethics, in addition both types of students believed to present the same degree of knowledge. However, students of the active methodology gave more importance to the bioethics and medical ethics discipline and presented greater knowledge on one of the questions concerning the standardization of the Code of Medical Ethics.</description><subject>FOS: Other medical sciences</subject><subject>FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion</subject><subject>Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j71qwzAURrVkKEmfoItewK5k2ZKVrQ39g0CW7OJa9yoWxHKx1KFvX5emy3eGDw4cxh6kqLXo28fJ1iFe8ggL1ca2slfqju2f40xljD5zSMgnwujhynP5Qkol73kh8GNMl_Uq44y8LJByLHFOO7YJcM10f-OWnV9fzof36nh6-zg8HSvsraoGM0hssA19IG16YQOJIAmE6fxKkkioh4aUbLowdMJqg1J3vvF2XWzVlqk_LUIBHwu5zyVOsHw7KdxvmJus-w9ztzD1A1pGSvA</recordid><startdate>20190403</startdate><enddate>20190403</enddate><creator>Richaele De Sousa Teixeira</creator><creator>Silva, Rodrigo Lemos Da</creator><creator>Silva, Luigi Ferreira E</creator><creator>Thaynnar Laryssa Kizan Da Silva Miranda</creator><creator>Teixeira, Renan Kleber Costa</creator><creator>Silva, José Antônio Cordero Da</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190403</creationdate><title>Bioethics and medical students: teaching method transition</title><author>Richaele De Sousa Teixeira ; Silva, Rodrigo Lemos Da ; Silva, Luigi Ferreira E ; Thaynnar Laryssa Kizan Da Silva Miranda ; Teixeira, Renan Kleber Costa ; Silva, José Antônio Cordero Da</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d893-b7b1d2d4f8fe67809fe0f1ea075cf1ee1ded6b2e3125fb50967d165c2c965cd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>FOS: Other medical sciences</topic><topic>FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion</topic><topic>Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richaele De Sousa Teixeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Rodrigo Lemos Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Luigi Ferreira E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thaynnar Laryssa Kizan Da Silva Miranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Renan Kleber Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, José Antônio Cordero Da</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richaele De Sousa Teixeira</au><au>Silva, Rodrigo Lemos Da</au><au>Silva, Luigi Ferreira E</au><au>Thaynnar Laryssa Kizan Da Silva Miranda</au><au>Teixeira, Renan Kleber Costa</au><au>Silva, José Antônio Cordero Da</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Bioethics and medical students: teaching method transition</title><date>2019-04-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><abstract>Abstract Active methodologies has proven to be the best alternative for medical education. However, there no research, in the literature, comparing its use in teaching ethics and bioethics. Therefore, this study seeks to compare the knowledge of medical students from two different types of teaching (traditional and active) regarding the Code of Medical Ethics. The type of teaching methodology did not show impact on the degree of reading or knowledge of the Code of Medical Ethics, in addition both types of students believed to present the same degree of knowledge. However, students of the active methodology gave more importance to the bioethics and medical ethics discipline and presented greater knowledge on one of the questions concerning the standardization of the Code of Medical Ethics.</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.7941833</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7941833 |
| ispartof | |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_7941833 |
| source | DataCite |
| subjects | FOS: Other medical sciences FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified Philosophy |
| title | Bioethics and medical students: teaching method transition |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A48%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Richaele%20De%20Sousa%20Teixeira&rft.date=2019-04-03&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.7941833&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_7941833%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |