Searching for the best real-time RT-PCRs to detect Zika virus infections: the importance of comparing several protocols

Clinical manifestations of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya virus infections are very similar, making it difficult to reach a diagnosis based only on clinical grounds. In addition, there is an intense cross-reactivity between antibodies directed to Zika virus and other flaviviruses, and an accurate Zik...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: F.M. De Moraes, D.L.A. Espósito, T.M. Klein, B.A.L. Da Fonseca
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator F.M. De Moraes
D.L.A. Espósito
T.M. Klein
B.A.L. Da Fonseca
description Clinical manifestations of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya virus infections are very similar, making it difficult to reach a diagnosis based only on clinical grounds. In addition, there is an intense cross-reactivity between antibodies directed to Zika virus and other flaviviruses, and an accurate Zika diagnosis is best achieved by real-time RT-PCR. However, some real-time RT-PCR show better performance than others. To reach the best possible Zika diagnosis, the analytic sensitivity of some probe-based real-time RT-PCR amplifying Zika virus RNA was evaluated in spiked and clinical samples. We evaluated primers and probes to detect Zika virus, which had been published before, and tested sensitivity using serum spiked and patient samples by real-time RT-PCR. When tested against spiked samples, the previously described primers showed different sensitivity, with very similar results when samples from patients (serum and urine) were analyzed. Real-time RT-PCR designed to amplify Zika virus NS1 showed the best analytical sensitivity for all samples.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.6318776
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_6318776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_6318776</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_63187763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdjjFuwkAQRbdJgRJOQDMXsGPLyEBalChlRKhoVsMyi0fxeqzZCRG3JyBygVRf-tJ7es7N6qpsq-X8Oa3KyMfcoVLZNvVysWgn7ueTUEPHwxGiKFhHsKdsoIR9YZwINtviY73JYAIHMgoGO_5COLF-Z-Ah_j4sQ365sZxGUcMhEEiEIGlEvboznUixh1HFJEifn9xDxD7T9L6Prnl73a7fiwMaBjbyo3JCPfu68td8n1b-L9_f85v_UReFq1pE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Searching for the best real-time RT-PCRs to detect Zika virus infections: the importance of comparing several protocols</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>F.M. De Moraes ; D.L.A. Espósito ; T.M. Klein ; B.A.L. Da Fonseca</creator><creatorcontrib>F.M. De Moraes ; D.L.A. Espósito ; T.M. Klein ; B.A.L. Da Fonseca</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical manifestations of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya virus infections are very similar, making it difficult to reach a diagnosis based only on clinical grounds. In addition, there is an intense cross-reactivity between antibodies directed to Zika virus and other flaviviruses, and an accurate Zika diagnosis is best achieved by real-time RT-PCR. However, some real-time RT-PCR show better performance than others. To reach the best possible Zika diagnosis, the analytic sensitivity of some probe-based real-time RT-PCR amplifying Zika virus RNA was evaluated in spiked and clinical samples. We evaluated primers and probes to detect Zika virus, which had been published before, and tested sensitivity using serum spiked and patient samples by real-time RT-PCR. When tested against spiked samples, the previously described primers showed different sensitivity, with very similar results when samples from patients (serum and urine) were analyzed. Real-time RT-PCR designed to amplify Zika virus NS1 showed the best analytical sensitivity for all samples.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.6318776</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>FOS: Biological sciences ; Medicine ; Microbiology not elsewhere classified</subject><creationdate>2018</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1892</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6318776$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>F.M. De Moraes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D.L.A. Espósito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>T.M. Klein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>B.A.L. Da Fonseca</creatorcontrib><title>Searching for the best real-time RT-PCRs to detect Zika virus infections: the importance of comparing several protocols</title><description>Clinical manifestations of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya virus infections are very similar, making it difficult to reach a diagnosis based only on clinical grounds. In addition, there is an intense cross-reactivity between antibodies directed to Zika virus and other flaviviruses, and an accurate Zika diagnosis is best achieved by real-time RT-PCR. However, some real-time RT-PCR show better performance than others. To reach the best possible Zika diagnosis, the analytic sensitivity of some probe-based real-time RT-PCR amplifying Zika virus RNA was evaluated in spiked and clinical samples. We evaluated primers and probes to detect Zika virus, which had been published before, and tested sensitivity using serum spiked and patient samples by real-time RT-PCR. When tested against spiked samples, the previously described primers showed different sensitivity, with very similar results when samples from patients (serum and urine) were analyzed. Real-time RT-PCR designed to amplify Zika virus NS1 showed the best analytical sensitivity for all samples.</description><subject>FOS: Biological sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Microbiology not elsewhere classified</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNqdjjFuwkAQRbdJgRJOQDMXsGPLyEBalChlRKhoVsMyi0fxeqzZCRG3JyBygVRf-tJ7es7N6qpsq-X8Oa3KyMfcoVLZNvVysWgn7ueTUEPHwxGiKFhHsKdsoIR9YZwINtviY73JYAIHMgoGO_5COLF-Z-Ah_j4sQ365sZxGUcMhEEiEIGlEvboznUixh1HFJEifn9xDxD7T9L6Prnl73a7fiwMaBjbyo3JCPfu68td8n1b-L9_f85v_UReFq1pE</recordid><startdate>20180523</startdate><enddate>20180523</enddate><creator>F.M. De Moraes</creator><creator>D.L.A. Espósito</creator><creator>T.M. Klein</creator><creator>B.A.L. Da Fonseca</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180523</creationdate><title>Searching for the best real-time RT-PCRs to detect Zika virus infections: the importance of comparing several protocols</title><author>F.M. De Moraes ; D.L.A. Espósito ; T.M. Klein ; B.A.L. Da Fonseca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_63187763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>FOS: Biological sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Microbiology not elsewhere classified</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>F.M. De Moraes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D.L.A. Espósito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>T.M. Klein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>B.A.L. Da Fonseca</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>F.M. De Moraes</au><au>D.L.A. Espósito</au><au>T.M. Klein</au><au>B.A.L. Da Fonseca</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Searching for the best real-time RT-PCRs to detect Zika virus infections: the importance of comparing several protocols</title><date>2018-05-23</date><risdate>2018</risdate><abstract>Clinical manifestations of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya virus infections are very similar, making it difficult to reach a diagnosis based only on clinical grounds. In addition, there is an intense cross-reactivity between antibodies directed to Zika virus and other flaviviruses, and an accurate Zika diagnosis is best achieved by real-time RT-PCR. However, some real-time RT-PCR show better performance than others. To reach the best possible Zika diagnosis, the analytic sensitivity of some probe-based real-time RT-PCR amplifying Zika virus RNA was evaluated in spiked and clinical samples. We evaluated primers and probes to detect Zika virus, which had been published before, and tested sensitivity using serum spiked and patient samples by real-time RT-PCR. When tested against spiked samples, the previously described primers showed different sensitivity, with very similar results when samples from patients (serum and urine) were analyzed. Real-time RT-PCR designed to amplify Zika virus NS1 showed the best analytical sensitivity for all samples.</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.6318776</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.6318776
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_6318776
source DataCite
subjects FOS: Biological sciences
Medicine
Microbiology not elsewhere classified
title Searching for the best real-time RT-PCRs to detect Zika virus infections: the importance of comparing several protocols
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A38%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=F.M.%20De%20Moraes&rft.date=2018-05-23&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.6318776&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_6318776%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true