On the cortical dynamics of word production: a review of the MEG evidence
Word production has been investigated using magnetoencephalography [MEG] for 20 years. We perform a review and meta-analysis of MEG studies of word production published in the last 20 years (1994-2014). We assess significant findings with the goals of gauging spatial and temporal resolution, evaluat...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Dataset |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Dashiel Munding Anne-Sophie Dubarry F.-Xavier Alario |
| description | Word production has been investigated using magnetoencephalography [MEG] for 20 years. We perform a review and meta-analysis of MEG studies of word production published in the last 20 years (1994-2014). We assess significant findings with the goals of gauging spatial and temporal resolution, evaluating the between-studies consistency of the cortical response, and the reliability of cognitive inferences made from these findings. We use the author's own attribution of activity to function and current serial and interactive models to scaffold our analysis. Despite current data trending towards seriality in the dynamics of component functions of speech, no strong claims are warranted regarding the serial or parallel nature of cognitive processes. We suggest that future studies might employ standardised protocols and analyses, and report their results more comprehensively to make inferring cognitive function and relating MEG data to psycholinguistic models more efficient. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.6084/m9.figshare.3187084 |
| format | Dataset |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_3187084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_3187084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d894-b6a091fb7b8bdddb7f5e5d9d6d1674d4c0da0a263308c30b0db04764bc7ac2733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j81qAjEUhbPpotg-QTd5gZkmJuanuyLWChY37sNNbkYDzkQyacW3r0Pt6sB3OAc-Ql44axUz8rW3bZcO4xFKbAU3-sYeyWY30HqMNORSU4ATxesAfQojzR295IL0XDJ-h5ry8EaBlviT4mUqp9XXak1vAOMQ4hN56OA0xud7zsj-Y7Vffjbb3XqzfN82aKxsvAJmeee1Nx4Rve4WcYEWFXKlJcrAEBjMlRDMBME8Q8-kVtIHDWGuhZgR8XeLUCGkGt25pB7K1XHmJk_XW_fv6e6e4hfFx08X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>On the cortical dynamics of word production: a review of the MEG evidence</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Dashiel Munding ; Anne-Sophie Dubarry ; F.-Xavier Alario</creator><creatorcontrib>Dashiel Munding ; Anne-Sophie Dubarry ; F.-Xavier Alario</creatorcontrib><description>Word production has been investigated using magnetoencephalography [MEG] for 20 years. We perform a review and meta-analysis of MEG studies of word production published in the last 20 years (1994-2014). We assess significant findings with the goals of gauging spatial and temporal resolution, evaluating the between-studies consistency of the cortical response, and the reliability of cognitive inferences made from these findings. We use the author's own attribution of activity to function and current serial and interactive models to scaffold our analysis. Despite current data trending towards seriality in the dynamics of component functions of speech, no strong claims are warranted regarding the serial or parallel nature of cognitive processes. We suggest that future studies might employ standardised protocols and analyses, and report their results more comprehensively to make inferring cognitive function and relating MEG data to psycholinguistic models more efficient.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3187084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified ; Biotechnology ; FOS: Biological sciences ; FOS: Health sciences ; Medicine ; Mental Health ; Science Policy</subject><creationdate>2016</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3187084$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dashiel Munding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anne-Sophie Dubarry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>F.-Xavier Alario</creatorcontrib><title>On the cortical dynamics of word production: a review of the MEG evidence</title><description>Word production has been investigated using magnetoencephalography [MEG] for 20 years. We perform a review and meta-analysis of MEG studies of word production published in the last 20 years (1994-2014). We assess significant findings with the goals of gauging spatial and temporal resolution, evaluating the between-studies consistency of the cortical response, and the reliability of cognitive inferences made from these findings. We use the author's own attribution of activity to function and current serial and interactive models to scaffold our analysis. Despite current data trending towards seriality in the dynamics of component functions of speech, no strong claims are warranted regarding the serial or parallel nature of cognitive processes. We suggest that future studies might employ standardised protocols and analyses, and report their results more comprehensively to make inferring cognitive function and relating MEG data to psycholinguistic models more efficient.</description><subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>FOS: Biological sciences</subject><subject>FOS: Health sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j81qAjEUhbPpotg-QTd5gZkmJuanuyLWChY37sNNbkYDzkQyacW3r0Pt6sB3OAc-Ql44axUz8rW3bZcO4xFKbAU3-sYeyWY30HqMNORSU4ATxesAfQojzR295IL0XDJ-h5ry8EaBlviT4mUqp9XXak1vAOMQ4hN56OA0xud7zsj-Y7Vffjbb3XqzfN82aKxsvAJmeee1Nx4Rve4WcYEWFXKlJcrAEBjMlRDMBME8Q8-kVtIHDWGuhZgR8XeLUCGkGt25pB7K1XHmJk_XW_fv6e6e4hfFx08X</recordid><startdate>20160420</startdate><enddate>20160420</enddate><creator>Dashiel Munding</creator><creator>Anne-Sophie Dubarry</creator><creator>F.-Xavier Alario</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160420</creationdate><title>On the cortical dynamics of word production: a review of the MEG evidence</title><author>Dashiel Munding ; Anne-Sophie Dubarry ; F.-Xavier Alario</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d894-b6a091fb7b8bdddb7f5e5d9d6d1674d4c0da0a263308c30b0db04764bc7ac2733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>FOS: Biological sciences</topic><topic>FOS: Health sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dashiel Munding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anne-Sophie Dubarry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>F.-Xavier Alario</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dashiel Munding</au><au>Anne-Sophie Dubarry</au><au>F.-Xavier Alario</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>On the cortical dynamics of word production: a review of the MEG evidence</title><date>2016-04-20</date><risdate>2016</risdate><abstract>Word production has been investigated using magnetoencephalography [MEG] for 20 years. We perform a review and meta-analysis of MEG studies of word production published in the last 20 years (1994-2014). We assess significant findings with the goals of gauging spatial and temporal resolution, evaluating the between-studies consistency of the cortical response, and the reliability of cognitive inferences made from these findings. We use the author's own attribution of activity to function and current serial and interactive models to scaffold our analysis. Despite current data trending towards seriality in the dynamics of component functions of speech, no strong claims are warranted regarding the serial or parallel nature of cognitive processes. We suggest that future studies might employ standardised protocols and analyses, and report their results more comprehensively to make inferring cognitive function and relating MEG data to psycholinguistic models more efficient.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.3187084</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3187084 |
| ispartof | |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_3187084 |
| source | DataCite |
| subjects | Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified Biotechnology FOS: Biological sciences FOS: Health sciences Medicine Mental Health Science Policy |
| title | On the cortical dynamics of word production: a review of the MEG evidence |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A37%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Dashiel%20Munding&rft.date=2016-04-20&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.3187084&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_3187084%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |