Clinical evaluation of a highly multiplexed CRISPR-based diagnostic assay for diagnosing lower respiratory tract infection: a prospective cohort study

Accurate and rapid identification of causative pathogens is essential to guide the clinical management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Here we conducted a single-centre prospective study in 284 patients suspected of lower respiratory tract infections to evaluate the utility of a nucle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Lou, Hui, Wang, Xiaojia, Jiang, Qiuting, Li, Xi, Yao, Yake, Chen, Qi, Chen, Linxing, Zhang, Shanshan, Yu, Yunsong, Liu, Chao, Zhou, Hua
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Lou, Hui
Wang, Xiaojia
Jiang, Qiuting
Li, Xi
Yao, Yake
Chen, Qi
Chen, Linxing
Zhang, Shanshan
Yu, Yunsong
Liu, Chao
Zhou, Hua
description Accurate and rapid identification of causative pathogens is essential to guide the clinical management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Here we conducted a single-centre prospective study in 284 patients suspected of lower respiratory tract infections to evaluate the utility of a nucleic acid test based on highly multiplexed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and CRISPR-Cas12a. We determined the analytical and diagnostic performance of the CRISPR assay using a combination of reference standards, including conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS), and clinical adjudication by a panel of experts on infectious diseases and microbiology. The CRISPR assay showed a higher detection rate (63.0%) than conventional microbiological tests (38.4%) and was lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (72.9%). In detecting polymicrobial infections, the positivity rate of the CRISPR assay (19.4%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (3.5%) and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (28.9%). The overall diagnostic sensitivity of the CRISPR assay (67.8%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (41.8%), and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (93.2%). Considering the low cost, ease of operation, short turnaround time, and broad range of pathogens detected in a single test, the CRISPR assay has the potential to be implemented as a screening tool for the aetiological diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections patients, especially in cases where atypical bacteria or coinfections are suspected.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.27004922
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_27004922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_27004922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_270049223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdjzFOxDAQRdNQIOAGFHOBDd4QAaGNQNChhd4anHEykmNbY2fBF-G8bCRyAaqv96Wvr1dV13tV36mH9mbuastjmlCobu6VarumOa9-eseeDTqgI7oFMwcPwQLCxOPkCsyLyxwdfdMA_eH1_e2w-8R0goFx9CFlNoApYQEbZCvZj-DCFwkIpciCOUiBLGgysLdk1pvH00mUkOKKRwITpiAZUl6GclmdWXSJrv7yomqfnz76l92AGQ1n0lF4Ril6r_Sqp-dOb3p607v95-wXIa5nfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Clinical evaluation of a highly multiplexed CRISPR-based diagnostic assay for diagnosing lower respiratory tract infection: a prospective cohort study</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Lou, Hui ; Wang, Xiaojia ; Jiang, Qiuting ; Li, Xi ; Yao, Yake ; Chen, Qi ; Chen, Linxing ; Zhang, Shanshan ; Yu, Yunsong ; Liu, Chao ; Zhou, Hua</creator><creatorcontrib>Lou, Hui ; Wang, Xiaojia ; Jiang, Qiuting ; Li, Xi ; Yao, Yake ; Chen, Qi ; Chen, Linxing ; Zhang, Shanshan ; Yu, Yunsong ; Liu, Chao ; Zhou, Hua</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate and rapid identification of causative pathogens is essential to guide the clinical management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Here we conducted a single-centre prospective study in 284 patients suspected of lower respiratory tract infections to evaluate the utility of a nucleic acid test based on highly multiplexed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and CRISPR-Cas12a. We determined the analytical and diagnostic performance of the CRISPR assay using a combination of reference standards, including conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS), and clinical adjudication by a panel of experts on infectious diseases and microbiology. The CRISPR assay showed a higher detection rate (63.0%) than conventional microbiological tests (38.4%) and was lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (72.9%). In detecting polymicrobial infections, the positivity rate of the CRISPR assay (19.4%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (3.5%) and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (28.9%). The overall diagnostic sensitivity of the CRISPR assay (67.8%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (41.8%), and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (93.2%). Considering the low cost, ease of operation, short turnaround time, and broad range of pathogens detected in a single test, the CRISPR assay has the potential to be implemented as a screening tool for the aetiological diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections patients, especially in cases where atypical bacteria or coinfections are suspected.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.27004922</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Biotechnology ; Cancer ; Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified ; Computational Biology ; FOS: Biological sciences ; FOS: Clinical medicine ; FOS: Health sciences ; Genetics ; Immunology ; Infectious Diseases ; Medicine ; Microbiology ; Molecular Biology ; Science Policy ; Virology</subject><creationdate>2024</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1887</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27004922$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lou, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaojia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Qiuting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Linxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shanshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yunsong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Hua</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical evaluation of a highly multiplexed CRISPR-based diagnostic assay for diagnosing lower respiratory tract infection: a prospective cohort study</title><description>Accurate and rapid identification of causative pathogens is essential to guide the clinical management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Here we conducted a single-centre prospective study in 284 patients suspected of lower respiratory tract infections to evaluate the utility of a nucleic acid test based on highly multiplexed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and CRISPR-Cas12a. We determined the analytical and diagnostic performance of the CRISPR assay using a combination of reference standards, including conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS), and clinical adjudication by a panel of experts on infectious diseases and microbiology. The CRISPR assay showed a higher detection rate (63.0%) than conventional microbiological tests (38.4%) and was lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (72.9%). In detecting polymicrobial infections, the positivity rate of the CRISPR assay (19.4%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (3.5%) and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (28.9%). The overall diagnostic sensitivity of the CRISPR assay (67.8%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (41.8%), and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (93.2%). Considering the low cost, ease of operation, short turnaround time, and broad range of pathogens detected in a single test, the CRISPR assay has the potential to be implemented as a screening tool for the aetiological diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections patients, especially in cases where atypical bacteria or coinfections are suspected.</description><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified</subject><subject>Computational Biology</subject><subject>FOS: Biological sciences</subject><subject>FOS: Clinical medicine</subject><subject>FOS: Health sciences</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Infectious Diseases</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Molecular Biology</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Virology</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNqdjzFOxDAQRdNQIOAGFHOBDd4QAaGNQNChhd4anHEykmNbY2fBF-G8bCRyAaqv96Wvr1dV13tV36mH9mbuastjmlCobu6VarumOa9-eseeDTqgI7oFMwcPwQLCxOPkCsyLyxwdfdMA_eH1_e2w-8R0goFx9CFlNoApYQEbZCvZj-DCFwkIpciCOUiBLGgysLdk1pvH00mUkOKKRwITpiAZUl6GclmdWXSJrv7yomqfnz76l92AGQ1n0lF4Ril6r_Sqp-dOb3p607v95-wXIa5nfQ</recordid><startdate>20240912</startdate><enddate>20240912</enddate><creator>Lou, Hui</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaojia</creator><creator>Jiang, Qiuting</creator><creator>Li, Xi</creator><creator>Yao, Yake</creator><creator>Chen, Qi</creator><creator>Chen, Linxing</creator><creator>Zhang, Shanshan</creator><creator>Yu, Yunsong</creator><creator>Liu, Chao</creator><creator>Zhou, Hua</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240912</creationdate><title>Clinical evaluation of a highly multiplexed CRISPR-based diagnostic assay for diagnosing lower respiratory tract infection: a prospective cohort study</title><author>Lou, Hui ; Wang, Xiaojia ; Jiang, Qiuting ; Li, Xi ; Yao, Yake ; Chen, Qi ; Chen, Linxing ; Zhang, Shanshan ; Yu, Yunsong ; Liu, Chao ; Zhou, Hua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_270049223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified</topic><topic>Computational Biology</topic><topic>FOS: Biological sciences</topic><topic>FOS: Clinical medicine</topic><topic>FOS: Health sciences</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Infectious Diseases</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Molecular Biology</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lou, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaojia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Qiuting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Linxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shanshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yunsong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Hua</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lou, Hui</au><au>Wang, Xiaojia</au><au>Jiang, Qiuting</au><au>Li, Xi</au><au>Yao, Yake</au><au>Chen, Qi</au><au>Chen, Linxing</au><au>Zhang, Shanshan</au><au>Yu, Yunsong</au><au>Liu, Chao</au><au>Zhou, Hua</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Clinical evaluation of a highly multiplexed CRISPR-based diagnostic assay for diagnosing lower respiratory tract infection: a prospective cohort study</title><date>2024-09-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>Accurate and rapid identification of causative pathogens is essential to guide the clinical management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Here we conducted a single-centre prospective study in 284 patients suspected of lower respiratory tract infections to evaluate the utility of a nucleic acid test based on highly multiplexed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and CRISPR-Cas12a. We determined the analytical and diagnostic performance of the CRISPR assay using a combination of reference standards, including conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS), and clinical adjudication by a panel of experts on infectious diseases and microbiology. The CRISPR assay showed a higher detection rate (63.0%) than conventional microbiological tests (38.4%) and was lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (72.9%). In detecting polymicrobial infections, the positivity rate of the CRISPR assay (19.4%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (3.5%) and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (28.9%). The overall diagnostic sensitivity of the CRISPR assay (67.8%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (41.8%), and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (93.2%). Considering the low cost, ease of operation, short turnaround time, and broad range of pathogens detected in a single test, the CRISPR assay has the potential to be implemented as a screening tool for the aetiological diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections patients, especially in cases where atypical bacteria or coinfections are suspected.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.27004922</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.27004922
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_27004922
source DataCite
subjects Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified
Computational Biology
FOS: Biological sciences
FOS: Clinical medicine
FOS: Health sciences
Genetics
Immunology
Infectious Diseases
Medicine
Microbiology
Molecular Biology
Science Policy
Virology
title Clinical evaluation of a highly multiplexed CRISPR-based diagnostic assay for diagnosing lower respiratory tract infection: a prospective cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T10%3A02%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Lou,%20Hui&rft.date=2024-09-12&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.27004922&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_27004922%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true