Taking Stock of Land Use Conflict Research: A Systematic Map with Special Focus on Conceptual Approaches

The literature on land use conflicts has significantly increased in number in recent years, and keeping track has become challenging. Moreover, “land use conflict” is a rather fuzzy concept; a coherent understanding of what it encompasses is presently missing. Thus, the objective of this paper is to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Fienitz, Meike
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Fienitz, Meike
description The literature on land use conflicts has significantly increased in number in recent years, and keeping track has become challenging. Moreover, “land use conflict” is a rather fuzzy concept; a coherent understanding of what it encompasses is presently missing. Thus, the objective of this paper is to provide an overview of the current state of land use conflict research, with a special focus on different conceptual approaches. A systematic mapping of 306 scientific, peer-reviewed publications on land use conflicts was conducted, combined with an interpretive analysis of how the term “land use conflict” is used. This revealed an extensive research field with several well-covered subfields but also some knowledge gaps. Moreover, four different conceptual approaches that have been applied in the literature were identified. The paper thus contributes to the formulation of an evidence-based research agenda and to an improved conceptual understanding of the term “land use conflict.”
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.22586393
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_22586393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_22586393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_225863933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdzkEKwjAQheFsXIh6AxdzAWtra7HuRBQXurG6DsN0aoJtE5KIeHst6AVcPXjwwyfENImjPF5l87aIan3zCh1Hi8VyladFOhTqgnfd3aAMhu5gajhiV8HVM2xNVzeaApzZMzpSa9hA-fKBWwya4IQWnjooKC2Txgb2hh4eTNeXxDY8Pt_GWmeQFPuxGNTYeJ58dySy_e6yPcwqDEg6sLROt-heMollD5ZtIX9g-QOnf2ZvHbZUMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Taking Stock of Land Use Conflict Research: A Systematic Map with Special Focus on Conceptual Approaches</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Fienitz, Meike</creator><creatorcontrib>Fienitz, Meike</creatorcontrib><description>The literature on land use conflicts has significantly increased in number in recent years, and keeping track has become challenging. Moreover, “land use conflict” is a rather fuzzy concept; a coherent understanding of what it encompasses is presently missing. Thus, the objective of this paper is to provide an overview of the current state of land use conflict research, with a special focus on different conceptual approaches. A systematic mapping of 306 scientific, peer-reviewed publications on land use conflicts was conducted, combined with an interpretive analysis of how the term “land use conflict” is used. This revealed an extensive research field with several well-covered subfields but also some knowledge gaps. Moreover, four different conceptual approaches that have been applied in the literature were identified. The paper thus contributes to the formulation of an evidence-based research agenda and to an improved conceptual understanding of the term “land use conflict.”</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.22586393</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Ecology ; FOS: Biological sciences ; FOS: Sociology ; Information Systems not elsewhere classified ; Science Policy ; Sociology</subject><creationdate>2023</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22586393$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fienitz, Meike</creatorcontrib><title>Taking Stock of Land Use Conflict Research: A Systematic Map with Special Focus on Conceptual Approaches</title><description>The literature on land use conflicts has significantly increased in number in recent years, and keeping track has become challenging. Moreover, “land use conflict” is a rather fuzzy concept; a coherent understanding of what it encompasses is presently missing. Thus, the objective of this paper is to provide an overview of the current state of land use conflict research, with a special focus on different conceptual approaches. A systematic mapping of 306 scientific, peer-reviewed publications on land use conflicts was conducted, combined with an interpretive analysis of how the term “land use conflict” is used. This revealed an extensive research field with several well-covered subfields but also some knowledge gaps. Moreover, four different conceptual approaches that have been applied in the literature were identified. The paper thus contributes to the formulation of an evidence-based research agenda and to an improved conceptual understanding of the term “land use conflict.”</description><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>FOS: Biological sciences</subject><subject>FOS: Sociology</subject><subject>Information Systems not elsewhere classified</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNqdzkEKwjAQheFsXIh6AxdzAWtra7HuRBQXurG6DsN0aoJtE5KIeHst6AVcPXjwwyfENImjPF5l87aIan3zCh1Hi8VyladFOhTqgnfd3aAMhu5gajhiV8HVM2xNVzeaApzZMzpSa9hA-fKBWwya4IQWnjooKC2Txgb2hh4eTNeXxDY8Pt_GWmeQFPuxGNTYeJ58dySy_e6yPcwqDEg6sLROt-heMollD5ZtIX9g-QOnf2ZvHbZUMw</recordid><startdate>20230411</startdate><enddate>20230411</enddate><creator>Fienitz, Meike</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230411</creationdate><title>Taking Stock of Land Use Conflict Research: A Systematic Map with Special Focus on Conceptual Approaches</title><author>Fienitz, Meike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_225863933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>FOS: Biological sciences</topic><topic>FOS: Sociology</topic><topic>Information Systems not elsewhere classified</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fienitz, Meike</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fienitz, Meike</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Taking Stock of Land Use Conflict Research: A Systematic Map with Special Focus on Conceptual Approaches</title><date>2023-04-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><abstract>The literature on land use conflicts has significantly increased in number in recent years, and keeping track has become challenging. Moreover, “land use conflict” is a rather fuzzy concept; a coherent understanding of what it encompasses is presently missing. Thus, the objective of this paper is to provide an overview of the current state of land use conflict research, with a special focus on different conceptual approaches. A systematic mapping of 306 scientific, peer-reviewed publications on land use conflicts was conducted, combined with an interpretive analysis of how the term “land use conflict” is used. This revealed an extensive research field with several well-covered subfields but also some knowledge gaps. Moreover, four different conceptual approaches that have been applied in the literature were identified. The paper thus contributes to the formulation of an evidence-based research agenda and to an improved conceptual understanding of the term “land use conflict.”</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.22586393</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.22586393
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_22586393
source DataCite
subjects Ecology
FOS: Biological sciences
FOS: Sociology
Information Systems not elsewhere classified
Science Policy
Sociology
title Taking Stock of Land Use Conflict Research: A Systematic Map with Special Focus on Conceptual Approaches
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T21%3A43%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Fienitz,%20Meike&rft.date=2023-04-11&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.22586393&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_22586393%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true