Comparison of methods for quantification of ribozyme cleavage

Comparison of methods for quantification of ribozyme cleavage

Copyright information:Taken from "A structural analysis of catalytic activities of hammerhead ribozymes"http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/469BMC Bioinformatics 2007;8():469-469.Published online 30 Nov 2007PMCID:PMC2238771. Ribozyme GUC7 was incubated for various lengths of time from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Shao, Yu, Wu, Susan, Chan, Chi Yu, Klapper, Jessie R, Schneider, Erasmus, Ding, Ye
Format: Bild
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Uncategorised
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Shao, Yu
Wu, Susan
Chan, Chi Yu
Klapper, Jessie R
Schneider, Erasmus
Ding, Ye
description Copyright information:Taken from "A structural analysis of catalytic activities of hammerhead ribozymes"http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/469BMC Bioinformatics 2007;8():469-469.Published online 30 Nov 2007PMCID:PMC2238771. Ribozyme GUC7 was incubated for various lengths of time from 0 to 60 min, as indicated, and substrate cleavage activity was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and real-time RT-PCR as described in Methods. After electrophoresis (right panel), the gel was stained with ethidium bromide, and the bands were quantified by densitometry. Relative band intensity was then graphed against time (left panel). Target (◆), remaining substrate; product 1 (■) and 2 (▲), relative amounts of each of the two cleavage products. Separately, the substrate was quantified by real-time RT-PCR, and the relative amount of remaining substrate (●) was graphed against time.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.21783
format Image
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_21783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_21783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_217833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzM7Aw0c-11EvLTC_OSCxK1TMyNLcw5mSwdc7PLUgsyizOz1PIT1PITS3JyE8pVkjLL1IoLE3MK8lMy0xOLMmEyBZlJuVXVeamKiTnpCaWJaan8jCwpiXmFKfyQmluBkM31xBnD92UxJLE5MyS1PiCoszcxKLKeEODeJAT4nMt42FOiAc7wZgcPQD6m0Q1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>image</recordtype></control><display><type>image</type><title>Comparison of methods for quantification of ribozyme cleavage</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Shao, Yu ; Wu, Susan ; Chan, Chi Yu ; Klapper, Jessie R ; Schneider, Erasmus ; Ding, Ye</creator><creatorcontrib>Shao, Yu ; Wu, Susan ; Chan, Chi Yu ; Klapper, Jessie R ; Schneider, Erasmus ; Ding, Ye</creatorcontrib><description>Copyright information:Taken from "A structural analysis of catalytic activities of hammerhead ribozymes"http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/469BMC Bioinformatics 2007;8():469-469.Published online 30 Nov 2007PMCID:PMC2238771. Ribozyme GUC7 was incubated for various lengths of time from 0 to 60 min, as indicated, and substrate cleavage activity was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and real-time RT-PCR as described in Methods. After electrophoresis (right panel), the gel was stained with ethidium bromide, and the bands were quantified by densitometry. Relative band intensity was then graphed against time (left panel). Target (◆), remaining substrate; product 1 (■) and 2 (▲), relative amounts of each of the two cleavage products. Separately, the substrate was quantified by real-time RT-PCR, and the relative amount of remaining substrate (●) was graphed against time.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>figshare</publisher><subject>Uncategorised</subject><creationdate>2011</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1894</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21783$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shao, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Chi Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klapper, Jessie R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Erasmus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ye</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of methods for quantification of ribozyme cleavage</title><description>Copyright information:Taken from "A structural analysis of catalytic activities of hammerhead ribozymes"http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/469BMC Bioinformatics 2007;8():469-469.Published online 30 Nov 2007PMCID:PMC2238771. Ribozyme GUC7 was incubated for various lengths of time from 0 to 60 min, as indicated, and substrate cleavage activity was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and real-time RT-PCR as described in Methods. After electrophoresis (right panel), the gel was stained with ethidium bromide, and the bands were quantified by densitometry. Relative band intensity was then graphed against time (left panel). Target (◆), remaining substrate; product 1 (■) and 2 (▲), relative amounts of each of the two cleavage products. Separately, the substrate was quantified by real-time RT-PCR, and the relative amount of remaining substrate (●) was graphed against time.</description><subject>Uncategorised</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>image</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>image</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzM7Aw0c-11EvLTC_OSCxK1TMyNLcw5mSwdc7PLUgsyizOz1PIT1PITS3JyE8pVkjLL1IoLE3MK8lMy0xOLMmEyBZlJuVXVeamKiTnpCaWJaan8jCwpiXmFKfyQmluBkM31xBnD92UxJLE5MyS1PiCoszcxKLKeEODeJAT4nMt42FOiAc7wZgcPQD6m0Q1</recordid><startdate>20111230</startdate><enddate>20111230</enddate><creator>Shao, Yu</creator><creator>Wu, Susan</creator><creator>Chan, Chi Yu</creator><creator>Klapper, Jessie R</creator><creator>Schneider, Erasmus</creator><creator>Ding, Ye</creator><general>figshare</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111230</creationdate><title>Comparison of methods for quantification of ribozyme cleavage</title><author>Shao, Yu ; Wu, Susan ; Chan, Chi Yu ; Klapper, Jessie R ; Schneider, Erasmus ; Ding, Ye</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_217833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>images</rsrctype><prefilter>images</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Uncategorised</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shao, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Chi Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klapper, Jessie R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Erasmus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ye</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shao, Yu</au><au>Wu, Susan</au><au>Chan, Chi Yu</au><au>Klapper, Jessie R</au><au>Schneider, Erasmus</au><au>Ding, Ye</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><title>Comparison of methods for quantification of ribozyme cleavage</title><date>2011-12-30</date><risdate>2011</risdate><abstract>Copyright information:Taken from "A structural analysis of catalytic activities of hammerhead ribozymes"http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/469BMC Bioinformatics 2007;8():469-469.Published online 30 Nov 2007PMCID:PMC2238771. Ribozyme GUC7 was incubated for various lengths of time from 0 to 60 min, as indicated, and substrate cleavage activity was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and real-time RT-PCR as described in Methods. After electrophoresis (right panel), the gel was stained with ethidium bromide, and the bands were quantified by densitometry. Relative band intensity was then graphed against time (left panel). Target (◆), remaining substrate; product 1 (■) and 2 (▲), relative amounts of each of the two cleavage products. Separately, the substrate was quantified by real-time RT-PCR, and the relative amount of remaining substrate (●) was graphed against time.</abstract><pub>figshare</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.21783</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21783
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_21783
source DataCite
subjects Uncategorised
title Comparison of methods for quantification of ribozyme cleavage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T08%3A07%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Shao,%20Yu&rft.date=2011-12-30&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.21783&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_21783%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true