COMPARISON BETWEEN DATA PROCESSING FROM GT3X+ ACCELEROMETER FOR VIGOROUS AND MODERATE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
ABSTRACT The use of accelerometers to measure physical activity in epidemiological research presents challenges to increase comparability between studies that use this equipment. In this sense, the objective of this work is to compare time estimates in MVPA for adults from different data processing...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Dataset |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Soares, Andrew Matheus Gomes Moço, Barbara Pancoti Oliveira, Aldair Jose de |
| description | ABSTRACT The use of accelerometers to measure physical activity in epidemiological research presents challenges to increase comparability between studies that use this equipment. In this sense, the objective of this work is to compare time estimates in MVPA for adults from different data processing methods, using the Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer. This is a cross-sectional study, from the baseline of the pilot study of the Longitudinal Study of the Determinants of Physical Activity. Sample had 31 outsourced employees of both genders, with an average age of 47.05 years (SD=9.35). Participants used GT3X+ model accelerometers for seven consecutive days. The MVPA time estimate was generated using Actilife and R-package GGIR software. Descriptive statistical analyses, ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc for comparability were performed in the R software. Bland-Altman analysis was performed in SigmaPlot to assess bias and agreement. There was a significant difference in the mean time of MVPA between count-based data and raw data (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.6084/m9.figshare.21716104 |
| format | Dataset |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_21716104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_21716104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d914-716997147de073ec40b04b51ead1f0ed1ce750afa53ca0dc63d2ee585c1dbec73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEFPgzAAhXvxYKb_wEPvBmzXAuNYobAmQEmp051IacskkcSwXfz3suhOLy957-XlA-AJozBGO_oyp-E4nc6fZvHhFic4xojeg1Mm65Yp0ckGvnL9znkDc6YZbJXMeNeJpoSFkjUsNfl4hizLeMVXzzVXsJAKHkQplXzrIGtyWMucK6Y5bPfHTmSsWgtaHIQ-PoC70Xyd_eO_boAuuM72QSXLazBwKabB-ipNE0wT51FCvKVoQHSIsDcOj8g7bH0SITOaiFiDnI2J23of7SKL3eBtQjaA_s06czF2uvj-e5lms_z0GPVXDP2c9jcM_Q0D-QUkelGC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>COMPARISON BETWEEN DATA PROCESSING FROM GT3X+ ACCELEROMETER FOR VIGOROUS AND MODERATE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Soares, Andrew Matheus Gomes ; Moço, Barbara Pancoti ; Oliveira, Aldair Jose de</creator><creatorcontrib>Soares, Andrew Matheus Gomes ; Moço, Barbara Pancoti ; Oliveira, Aldair Jose de</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT The use of accelerometers to measure physical activity in epidemiological research presents challenges to increase comparability between studies that use this equipment. In this sense, the objective of this work is to compare time estimates in MVPA for adults from different data processing methods, using the Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer. This is a cross-sectional study, from the baseline of the pilot study of the Longitudinal Study of the Determinants of Physical Activity. Sample had 31 outsourced employees of both genders, with an average age of 47.05 years (SD=9.35). Participants used GT3X+ model accelerometers for seven consecutive days. The MVPA time estimate was generated using Actilife and R-package GGIR software. Descriptive statistical analyses, ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc for comparability were performed in the R software. Bland-Altman analysis was performed in SigmaPlot to assess bias and agreement. There was a significant difference in the mean time of MVPA between count-based data and raw data (p<0.001). The average time in MVPA was shorter from processing by raw data than in counts (-264.81 min/day; p<0.001). Concluding that the findings suggest that there is no statistically equivalence between the methods compared to estimate MVPA time.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21716104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>Education systems not elsewhere classified ; FOS: Educational sciences</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1894</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21716104$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soares, Andrew Matheus Gomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moço, Barbara Pancoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Aldair Jose de</creatorcontrib><title>COMPARISON BETWEEN DATA PROCESSING FROM GT3X+ ACCELEROMETER FOR VIGOROUS AND MODERATE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY</title><description>ABSTRACT The use of accelerometers to measure physical activity in epidemiological research presents challenges to increase comparability between studies that use this equipment. In this sense, the objective of this work is to compare time estimates in MVPA for adults from different data processing methods, using the Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer. This is a cross-sectional study, from the baseline of the pilot study of the Longitudinal Study of the Determinants of Physical Activity. Sample had 31 outsourced employees of both genders, with an average age of 47.05 years (SD=9.35). Participants used GT3X+ model accelerometers for seven consecutive days. The MVPA time estimate was generated using Actilife and R-package GGIR software. Descriptive statistical analyses, ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc for comparability were performed in the R software. Bland-Altman analysis was performed in SigmaPlot to assess bias and agreement. There was a significant difference in the mean time of MVPA between count-based data and raw data (p<0.001). The average time in MVPA was shorter from processing by raw data than in counts (-264.81 min/day; p<0.001). Concluding that the findings suggest that there is no statistically equivalence between the methods compared to estimate MVPA time.</description><subject>Education systems not elsewhere classified</subject><subject>FOS: Educational sciences</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kEFPgzAAhXvxYKb_wEPvBmzXAuNYobAmQEmp051IacskkcSwXfz3suhOLy957-XlA-AJozBGO_oyp-E4nc6fZvHhFic4xojeg1Mm65Yp0ckGvnL9znkDc6YZbJXMeNeJpoSFkjUsNfl4hizLeMVXzzVXsJAKHkQplXzrIGtyWMucK6Y5bPfHTmSsWgtaHIQ-PoC70Xyd_eO_boAuuM72QSXLazBwKabB-ipNE0wT51FCvKVoQHSIsDcOj8g7bH0SITOaiFiDnI2J23of7SKL3eBtQjaA_s06czF2uvj-e5lms_z0GPVXDP2c9jcM_Q0D-QUkelGC</recordid><startdate>20221213</startdate><enddate>20221213</enddate><creator>Soares, Andrew Matheus Gomes</creator><creator>Moço, Barbara Pancoti</creator><creator>Oliveira, Aldair Jose de</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221213</creationdate><title>COMPARISON BETWEEN DATA PROCESSING FROM GT3X+ ACCELEROMETER FOR VIGOROUS AND MODERATE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY</title><author>Soares, Andrew Matheus Gomes ; Moço, Barbara Pancoti ; Oliveira, Aldair Jose de</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d914-716997147de073ec40b04b51ead1f0ed1ce750afa53ca0dc63d2ee585c1dbec73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Education systems not elsewhere classified</topic><topic>FOS: Educational sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soares, Andrew Matheus Gomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moço, Barbara Pancoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Aldair Jose de</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soares, Andrew Matheus Gomes</au><au>Moço, Barbara Pancoti</au><au>Oliveira, Aldair Jose de</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>COMPARISON BETWEEN DATA PROCESSING FROM GT3X+ ACCELEROMETER FOR VIGOROUS AND MODERATE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY</title><date>2022-12-13</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>ABSTRACT The use of accelerometers to measure physical activity in epidemiological research presents challenges to increase comparability between studies that use this equipment. In this sense, the objective of this work is to compare time estimates in MVPA for adults from different data processing methods, using the Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer. This is a cross-sectional study, from the baseline of the pilot study of the Longitudinal Study of the Determinants of Physical Activity. Sample had 31 outsourced employees of both genders, with an average age of 47.05 years (SD=9.35). Participants used GT3X+ model accelerometers for seven consecutive days. The MVPA time estimate was generated using Actilife and R-package GGIR software. Descriptive statistical analyses, ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc for comparability were performed in the R software. Bland-Altman analysis was performed in SigmaPlot to assess bias and agreement. There was a significant difference in the mean time of MVPA between count-based data and raw data (p<0.001). The average time in MVPA was shorter from processing by raw data than in counts (-264.81 min/day; p<0.001). Concluding that the findings suggest that there is no statistically equivalence between the methods compared to estimate MVPA time.</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.21716104</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21716104 |
| ispartof | |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_21716104 |
| source | DataCite |
| subjects | Education systems not elsewhere classified FOS: Educational sciences |
| title | COMPARISON BETWEEN DATA PROCESSING FROM GT3X+ ACCELEROMETER FOR VIGOROUS AND MODERATE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A45%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Soares,%20Andrew%20Matheus%20Gomes&rft.date=2022-12-13&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.21716104&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_21716104%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |