A brief trajectory of the constituent elements of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF)

Abstract This paper aims to retrace the trajectory of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), especially its policy-oriented learning process. Initially, we contrast the elements in Sabatier and Mazmanian (1980), where the first efforts to develop an analysis model are found, with the arguments foun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Oliveira, Henrique Campos de, Sanches Filho, Alvino
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Oliveira, Henrique Campos de
Sanches Filho, Alvino
description Abstract This paper aims to retrace the trajectory of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), especially its policy-oriented learning process. Initially, we contrast the elements in Sabatier and Mazmanian (1980), where the first efforts to develop an analysis model are found, with the arguments found in Sabatier (1987, 1988, and 1993). Subsequently, the historical trajectory of updates and versions of the model is discussed based on the analyses in Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1999), Sabatier and Weible (2007), and Jenkins-Smith et al. (2018). It was possible to follow the modifications in the model, the main hypotheses built, the criticisms, and their unfoldings. As main findings, it was evident throughout the ACF construction trajectory: four versions of the model over almost 30 years and with the decisive participation of six prominent authors who contributed to its main developments since the first version, present in Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1993); and Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1999), the model gains greater analytical capacity with the intermediate variables between the external factors and the policy subsystem and analytically refines the categories internal to the subsystem. One gap identified in this trajectory, and consequent proposal for a future research agenda, is the influence of international actors and their implications on policy modifications, a condition not explicitly addressed by the ACF in its varied versions, as highlighted by Jenkins-Smith et al. (2018).
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.21546013
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_21546013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_21546013</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d913-7a4080146aafeaae93bd14b21e6c4a2e512b70c2df0517b7f853252fef27f8f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j7tOxDAURN1QoIU_oHDJFgl-5VVGEQGklbbZgs66ca53DUmMHAPK3xMEqc6MRhrpEHLHWZqzUj2MVWrdeb5AwFTwTOWMy2vyWtMuOLQ0BnhDE31YqF_bBanx0xxd_MQpUhxwXDlvW91_eQNmoY2HwUXnJ9oGGPHbh3d6Xzft_oZcWRhmvP3njpzax1PznByOTy9NfUj6isukAMVKxlUOYBEAK9n1XHWCY24UCMy46ApmRG9ZxouusGUmRSYsWrFmK-SOqL_bHiIYF1F_BDdCWDRn-tdbj5XevPXmLX8AzdJUoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>A brief trajectory of the constituent elements of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF)</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Oliveira, Henrique Campos de ; Sanches Filho, Alvino</creator><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Henrique Campos de ; Sanches Filho, Alvino</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This paper aims to retrace the trajectory of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), especially its policy-oriented learning process. Initially, we contrast the elements in Sabatier and Mazmanian (1980), where the first efforts to develop an analysis model are found, with the arguments found in Sabatier (1987, 1988, and 1993). Subsequently, the historical trajectory of updates and versions of the model is discussed based on the analyses in Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1999), Sabatier and Weible (2007), and Jenkins-Smith et al. (2018). It was possible to follow the modifications in the model, the main hypotheses built, the criticisms, and their unfoldings. As main findings, it was evident throughout the ACF construction trajectory: four versions of the model over almost 30 years and with the decisive participation of six prominent authors who contributed to its main developments since the first version, present in Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1993); and Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1999), the model gains greater analytical capacity with the intermediate variables between the external factors and the policy subsystem and analytically refines the categories internal to the subsystem. One gap identified in this trajectory, and consequent proposal for a future research agenda, is the influence of international actors and their implications on policy modifications, a condition not explicitly addressed by the ACF in its varied versions, as highlighted by Jenkins-Smith et al. (2018).</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21546013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>Business and Management not elsewhere classified ; FOS: Economics and business ; FOS: Political science ; Public Administration</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>777,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21546013$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Henrique Campos de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanches Filho, Alvino</creatorcontrib><title>A brief trajectory of the constituent elements of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF)</title><description>Abstract This paper aims to retrace the trajectory of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), especially its policy-oriented learning process. Initially, we contrast the elements in Sabatier and Mazmanian (1980), where the first efforts to develop an analysis model are found, with the arguments found in Sabatier (1987, 1988, and 1993). Subsequently, the historical trajectory of updates and versions of the model is discussed based on the analyses in Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1999), Sabatier and Weible (2007), and Jenkins-Smith et al. (2018). It was possible to follow the modifications in the model, the main hypotheses built, the criticisms, and their unfoldings. As main findings, it was evident throughout the ACF construction trajectory: four versions of the model over almost 30 years and with the decisive participation of six prominent authors who contributed to its main developments since the first version, present in Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1993); and Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1999), the model gains greater analytical capacity with the intermediate variables between the external factors and the policy subsystem and analytically refines the categories internal to the subsystem. One gap identified in this trajectory, and consequent proposal for a future research agenda, is the influence of international actors and their implications on policy modifications, a condition not explicitly addressed by the ACF in its varied versions, as highlighted by Jenkins-Smith et al. (2018).</description><subject>Business and Management not elsewhere classified</subject><subject>FOS: Economics and business</subject><subject>FOS: Political science</subject><subject>Public Administration</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j7tOxDAURN1QoIU_oHDJFgl-5VVGEQGklbbZgs66ca53DUmMHAPK3xMEqc6MRhrpEHLHWZqzUj2MVWrdeb5AwFTwTOWMy2vyWtMuOLQ0BnhDE31YqF_bBanx0xxd_MQpUhxwXDlvW91_eQNmoY2HwUXnJ9oGGPHbh3d6Xzft_oZcWRhmvP3njpzax1PznByOTy9NfUj6isukAMVKxlUOYBEAK9n1XHWCY24UCMy46ApmRG9ZxouusGUmRSYsWrFmK-SOqL_bHiIYF1F_BDdCWDRn-tdbj5XevPXmLX8AzdJUoQ</recordid><startdate>20221112</startdate><enddate>20221112</enddate><creator>Oliveira, Henrique Campos de</creator><creator>Sanches Filho, Alvino</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221112</creationdate><title>A brief trajectory of the constituent elements of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF)</title><author>Oliveira, Henrique Campos de ; Sanches Filho, Alvino</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d913-7a4080146aafeaae93bd14b21e6c4a2e512b70c2df0517b7f853252fef27f8f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Business and Management not elsewhere classified</topic><topic>FOS: Economics and business</topic><topic>FOS: Political science</topic><topic>Public Administration</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Henrique Campos de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanches Filho, Alvino</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oliveira, Henrique Campos de</au><au>Sanches Filho, Alvino</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>A brief trajectory of the constituent elements of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF)</title><date>2022-11-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>Abstract This paper aims to retrace the trajectory of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), especially its policy-oriented learning process. Initially, we contrast the elements in Sabatier and Mazmanian (1980), where the first efforts to develop an analysis model are found, with the arguments found in Sabatier (1987, 1988, and 1993). Subsequently, the historical trajectory of updates and versions of the model is discussed based on the analyses in Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1999), Sabatier and Weible (2007), and Jenkins-Smith et al. (2018). It was possible to follow the modifications in the model, the main hypotheses built, the criticisms, and their unfoldings. As main findings, it was evident throughout the ACF construction trajectory: four versions of the model over almost 30 years and with the decisive participation of six prominent authors who contributed to its main developments since the first version, present in Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1993); and Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1999), the model gains greater analytical capacity with the intermediate variables between the external factors and the policy subsystem and analytically refines the categories internal to the subsystem. One gap identified in this trajectory, and consequent proposal for a future research agenda, is the influence of international actors and their implications on policy modifications, a condition not explicitly addressed by the ACF in its varied versions, as highlighted by Jenkins-Smith et al. (2018).</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.21546013</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21546013
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_21546013
source DataCite
subjects Business and Management not elsewhere classified
FOS: Economics and business
FOS: Political science
Public Administration
title A brief trajectory of the constituent elements of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A44%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Oliveira,%20Henrique%20Campos%20de&rft.date=2022-11-12&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.21546013&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_21546013%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true