Supplementary Material for: Effect of Hemadsorption Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 (CYTOCOV-19): A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

Introduction: Immunomodulatory therapies have shown beneficial effects in patients with severe COVID-19. Patients with hypercytokinemia might benefit from the removal of inflammatory mediators via hemadsorption. Methods: Single-center prospective randomized trial at the University Medical Center Ham...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: D., Jarczak, K., Roedl, M., Fischer, G., deHeer, C., Burdelski, D.P., Frings, B., Sensen, O., Boenisch, P.A., Tariparast, S., Kluge, A., Nierhaus
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator D., Jarczak
K., Roedl
M., Fischer
G., deHeer
C., Burdelski
D.P., Frings
B., Sensen
O., Boenisch
P.A., Tariparast
S., Kluge
A., Nierhaus
description Introduction: Immunomodulatory therapies have shown beneficial effects in patients with severe COVID-19. Patients with hypercytokinemia might benefit from the removal of inflammatory mediators via hemadsorption. Methods: Single-center prospective randomized trial at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany). Patients with confirmed COVID-19, refractory shock (norepinephrine ≥0.2 µg/kg/min to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg), interleukin-6 (IL-6) ≥500 ng/L, and an indication for renal replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were included. Patients received either hemadsorption therapy (HT) or standard medical therapy (SMT). For HT, a CytoSorb® adsorber was used for up to 5 days and was replaced every 18–24 h. The primary endpoint was sustained hemodynamic improvement (norepinephrine ≤0.05 µg/kg/min ≥24 h). Results: Of 242 screened patients, 24 were randomized and assigned to either HT (N = 12) or SMT (N = 12). Both groups had similar severity as assessed by SAPS II (median 75 points HT group vs. 79 SMT group, p = 0.590) and SOFA (17 vs. 16, p = 0.551). Median IL-6 levels were 2,269 (IQR 948–3,679) and 3,747 (1,301–5,415) ng/L in the HT and SMT groups at baseline, respectively (p = 0.378). Shock resolution (primary endpoint) was reached in 33% (4/12) versus 17% (2/12) in the HT and SMT groups, respectively (p = 0.640). Twenty-eight-day mortality was 58% (7/12) in the HT compared to 67% (8/12) in the SMT group (p = 1.0). During the treatment period of 5 days, 6/12 (50%) of the SMT patients died, in contrast to 1/12 (8%) in the HT group. Conclusion: HT was associated with a non-significant trend toward clinical improvement within the intervention period. In selected patients, HT might be an option for stabilization before transfer and further therapeutic decisions. This finding warrants further investigation in larger trials.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.21062980
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_21062980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_21062980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_210629803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdj71Ow0AQhN1QIOANKLaEIsYOURSnQyYoKVAssJCoTit7D690fzovIPM4PCkXKXkBqpkpZjRfll2XRb4sVos7W-WaP8YBI-XzsljOq1Vxnv2-foZgyJITjBM8o1BkNKB9XMNGa-oEvIYtWexHH4Owd9AOFDFMwA7qyMIdGjPBzhhoUDhNjfDNMkC9f9s9zsoKbur3dp9S8rdreIAm-jGkaf4ieEHXe8s_1EPtnURvTLINGy_QHr5cZmcazUhXR73IFk-btt7OehTsWEiFyDa9V2WhDqjKVuqEqk6o9_-s_QH0YmhC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Supplementary Material for: Effect of Hemadsorption Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 (CYTOCOV-19): A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>D., Jarczak ; K., Roedl ; M., Fischer ; G., deHeer ; C., Burdelski ; D.P., Frings ; B., Sensen ; O., Boenisch ; P.A., Tariparast ; S., Kluge ; A., Nierhaus</creator><creatorcontrib>D., Jarczak ; K., Roedl ; M., Fischer ; G., deHeer ; C., Burdelski ; D.P., Frings ; B., Sensen ; O., Boenisch ; P.A., Tariparast ; S., Kluge ; A., Nierhaus</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Immunomodulatory therapies have shown beneficial effects in patients with severe COVID-19. Patients with hypercytokinemia might benefit from the removal of inflammatory mediators via hemadsorption. Methods: Single-center prospective randomized trial at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany). Patients with confirmed COVID-19, refractory shock (norepinephrine ≥0.2 µg/kg/min to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg), interleukin-6 (IL-6) ≥500 ng/L, and an indication for renal replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were included. Patients received either hemadsorption therapy (HT) or standard medical therapy (SMT). For HT, a CytoSorb® adsorber was used for up to 5 days and was replaced every 18–24 h. The primary endpoint was sustained hemodynamic improvement (norepinephrine ≤0.05 µg/kg/min ≥24 h). Results: Of 242 screened patients, 24 were randomized and assigned to either HT (N = 12) or SMT (N = 12). Both groups had similar severity as assessed by SAPS II (median 75 points HT group vs. 79 SMT group, p = 0.590) and SOFA (17 vs. 16, p = 0.551). Median IL-6 levels were 2,269 (IQR 948–3,679) and 3,747 (1,301–5,415) ng/L in the HT and SMT groups at baseline, respectively (p = 0.378). Shock resolution (primary endpoint) was reached in 33% (4/12) versus 17% (2/12) in the HT and SMT groups, respectively (p = 0.640). Twenty-eight-day mortality was 58% (7/12) in the HT compared to 67% (8/12) in the SMT group (p = 1.0). During the treatment period of 5 days, 6/12 (50%) of the SMT patients died, in contrast to 1/12 (8%) in the HT group. Conclusion: HT was associated with a non-significant trend toward clinical improvement within the intervention period. In selected patients, HT might be an option for stabilization before transfer and further therapeutic decisions. This finding warrants further investigation in larger trials.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21062980</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Karger Publishers</publisher><subject>Medicine</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1892</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21062980$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>D., Jarczak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>K., Roedl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M., Fischer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>G., deHeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>C., Burdelski</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D.P., Frings</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>B., Sensen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O., Boenisch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>P.A., Tariparast</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S., Kluge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A., Nierhaus</creatorcontrib><title>Supplementary Material for: Effect of Hemadsorption Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 (CYTOCOV-19): A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial</title><description>Introduction: Immunomodulatory therapies have shown beneficial effects in patients with severe COVID-19. Patients with hypercytokinemia might benefit from the removal of inflammatory mediators via hemadsorption. Methods: Single-center prospective randomized trial at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany). Patients with confirmed COVID-19, refractory shock (norepinephrine ≥0.2 µg/kg/min to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg), interleukin-6 (IL-6) ≥500 ng/L, and an indication for renal replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were included. Patients received either hemadsorption therapy (HT) or standard medical therapy (SMT). For HT, a CytoSorb® adsorber was used for up to 5 days and was replaced every 18–24 h. The primary endpoint was sustained hemodynamic improvement (norepinephrine ≤0.05 µg/kg/min ≥24 h). Results: Of 242 screened patients, 24 were randomized and assigned to either HT (N = 12) or SMT (N = 12). Both groups had similar severity as assessed by SAPS II (median 75 points HT group vs. 79 SMT group, p = 0.590) and SOFA (17 vs. 16, p = 0.551). Median IL-6 levels were 2,269 (IQR 948–3,679) and 3,747 (1,301–5,415) ng/L in the HT and SMT groups at baseline, respectively (p = 0.378). Shock resolution (primary endpoint) was reached in 33% (4/12) versus 17% (2/12) in the HT and SMT groups, respectively (p = 0.640). Twenty-eight-day mortality was 58% (7/12) in the HT compared to 67% (8/12) in the SMT group (p = 1.0). During the treatment period of 5 days, 6/12 (50%) of the SMT patients died, in contrast to 1/12 (8%) in the HT group. Conclusion: HT was associated with a non-significant trend toward clinical improvement within the intervention period. In selected patients, HT might be an option for stabilization before transfer and further therapeutic decisions. This finding warrants further investigation in larger trials.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNqdj71Ow0AQhN1QIOANKLaEIsYOURSnQyYoKVAssJCoTit7D690fzovIPM4PCkXKXkBqpkpZjRfll2XRb4sVos7W-WaP8YBI-XzsljOq1Vxnv2-foZgyJITjBM8o1BkNKB9XMNGa-oEvIYtWexHH4Owd9AOFDFMwA7qyMIdGjPBzhhoUDhNjfDNMkC9f9s9zsoKbur3dp9S8rdreIAm-jGkaf4ieEHXe8s_1EPtnURvTLINGy_QHr5cZmcazUhXR73IFk-btt7OehTsWEiFyDa9V2WhDqjKVuqEqk6o9_-s_QH0YmhC</recordid><startdate>20220908</startdate><enddate>20220908</enddate><creator>D., Jarczak</creator><creator>K., Roedl</creator><creator>M., Fischer</creator><creator>G., deHeer</creator><creator>C., Burdelski</creator><creator>D.P., Frings</creator><creator>B., Sensen</creator><creator>O., Boenisch</creator><creator>P.A., Tariparast</creator><creator>S., Kluge</creator><creator>A., Nierhaus</creator><general>Karger Publishers</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220908</creationdate><title>Supplementary Material for: Effect of Hemadsorption Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 (CYTOCOV-19): A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial</title><author>D., Jarczak ; K., Roedl ; M., Fischer ; G., deHeer ; C., Burdelski ; D.P., Frings ; B., Sensen ; O., Boenisch ; P.A., Tariparast ; S., Kluge ; A., Nierhaus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_210629803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>D., Jarczak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>K., Roedl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M., Fischer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>G., deHeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>C., Burdelski</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D.P., Frings</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>B., Sensen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O., Boenisch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>P.A., Tariparast</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S., Kluge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A., Nierhaus</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>D., Jarczak</au><au>K., Roedl</au><au>M., Fischer</au><au>G., deHeer</au><au>C., Burdelski</au><au>D.P., Frings</au><au>B., Sensen</au><au>O., Boenisch</au><au>P.A., Tariparast</au><au>S., Kluge</au><au>A., Nierhaus</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Supplementary Material for: Effect of Hemadsorption Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 (CYTOCOV-19): A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial</title><date>2022-09-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>Introduction: Immunomodulatory therapies have shown beneficial effects in patients with severe COVID-19. Patients with hypercytokinemia might benefit from the removal of inflammatory mediators via hemadsorption. Methods: Single-center prospective randomized trial at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany). Patients with confirmed COVID-19, refractory shock (norepinephrine ≥0.2 µg/kg/min to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg), interleukin-6 (IL-6) ≥500 ng/L, and an indication for renal replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were included. Patients received either hemadsorption therapy (HT) or standard medical therapy (SMT). For HT, a CytoSorb® adsorber was used for up to 5 days and was replaced every 18–24 h. The primary endpoint was sustained hemodynamic improvement (norepinephrine ≤0.05 µg/kg/min ≥24 h). Results: Of 242 screened patients, 24 were randomized and assigned to either HT (N = 12) or SMT (N = 12). Both groups had similar severity as assessed by SAPS II (median 75 points HT group vs. 79 SMT group, p = 0.590) and SOFA (17 vs. 16, p = 0.551). Median IL-6 levels were 2,269 (IQR 948–3,679) and 3,747 (1,301–5,415) ng/L in the HT and SMT groups at baseline, respectively (p = 0.378). Shock resolution (primary endpoint) was reached in 33% (4/12) versus 17% (2/12) in the HT and SMT groups, respectively (p = 0.640). Twenty-eight-day mortality was 58% (7/12) in the HT compared to 67% (8/12) in the SMT group (p = 1.0). During the treatment period of 5 days, 6/12 (50%) of the SMT patients died, in contrast to 1/12 (8%) in the HT group. Conclusion: HT was associated with a non-significant trend toward clinical improvement within the intervention period. In selected patients, HT might be an option for stabilization before transfer and further therapeutic decisions. This finding warrants further investigation in larger trials.</abstract><pub>Karger Publishers</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.21062980</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21062980
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_21062980
source DataCite
subjects Medicine
title Supplementary Material for: Effect of Hemadsorption Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 (CYTOCOV-19): A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T19%3A05%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=D.,%20Jarczak&rft.date=2022-09-08&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.21062980&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_21062980%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true