Effect of inspiratory muscle training on patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review

ABSTRACT Studies have shown that among the various techniques that involve chest physical therapy, the inspiratory muscle training (IMT) is essential in the recovery of lung function and in preventing respiratory complications. However, the effect of IMT on patients undergoing bariatric surgery is s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Nardi, Angélica Trevisan De, Real, Amanda Albiero, Santos, Tamires Daros dos, Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira, Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Nardi, Angélica Trevisan De
Real, Amanda Albiero
Santos, Tamires Daros dos
Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira
Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa
description ABSTRACT Studies have shown that among the various techniques that involve chest physical therapy, the inspiratory muscle training (IMT) is essential in the recovery of lung function and in preventing respiratory complications. However, the effect of IMT on patients undergoing bariatric surgery is still inconclusive. The aim of this study was to systematically review randomized and controlled trials that assessed the effect of IMT compared with sham IMT, standard physical therapy (breathing exercises and early ambulation) or no intervention in the lung function on patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, TRIP, PEDro and Scopus databases with no publication year or language limits, following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. From 2,184 potentially eligible studies, two studies were included. Bias risk criteria were adapted and divided into nine main areas using the Cochrane Handbook. This review included 62 participants, being 30 allocated to receive Threshold® IMT device, but in different periods: preoperative and postoperative. IMT promoted increased maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) in relation to standard physical therapy, but no significant differences were found in maximal expiratory pressure (MEP). The studies showed low and unclear bias risk. IMT seems to be the most effective treatment in comparison with standard physical therapy alone in pre- or postoperative period. However, there is no solid evidence for clinical decision-making.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.20015520
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_20015520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_20015520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d910-3646e442fad9552ca505eed478a1587f09fd80f509f2901ca01db9c2566372fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMtqwzAURLXpoqT9gy70A3YlWbKt7kpIHxDoJntxI105glg2ktLiv69Dm9WBYRiGQ8gTZ3XLevk86tqHIZ8gYS0Y40oJdk_sznu0hU6ehpjnkKBMaaHjJdsz0pIgxBAHOkU6QwkYS6aX6DAN0zU-QgpQUrA0X9KAaXmhQPOSC45r29KE3wF_Hsidh3PGx39uyOFtd9h-VPuv98_t675ymrOqaWWLUgoPTq_fLCimEJ3seuCq7zzT3vXMq5VCM26BcXfUVqi2bTrhbbMh8m_WQQEbCpo5hRHSYjgzVwVm1OamwNwUNL9dv1oD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Effect of inspiratory muscle training on patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Nardi, Angélica Trevisan De ; Real, Amanda Albiero ; Santos, Tamires Daros dos ; Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira ; Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa</creator><creatorcontrib>Nardi, Angélica Trevisan De ; Real, Amanda Albiero ; Santos, Tamires Daros dos ; Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira ; Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Studies have shown that among the various techniques that involve chest physical therapy, the inspiratory muscle training (IMT) is essential in the recovery of lung function and in preventing respiratory complications. However, the effect of IMT on patients undergoing bariatric surgery is still inconclusive. The aim of this study was to systematically review randomized and controlled trials that assessed the effect of IMT compared with sham IMT, standard physical therapy (breathing exercises and early ambulation) or no intervention in the lung function on patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, TRIP, PEDro and Scopus databases with no publication year or language limits, following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. From 2,184 potentially eligible studies, two studies were included. Bias risk criteria were adapted and divided into nine main areas using the Cochrane Handbook. This review included 62 participants, being 30 allocated to receive Threshold® IMT device, but in different periods: preoperative and postoperative. IMT promoted increased maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) in relation to standard physical therapy, but no significant differences were found in maximal expiratory pressure (MEP). The studies showed low and unclear bias risk. IMT seems to be the most effective treatment in comparison with standard physical therapy alone in pre- or postoperative period. However, there is no solid evidence for clinical decision-making.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20015520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>FOS: Clinical medicine ; Orthopaedics ; Rehabilitation and Therapy (excl. Physiotherapy)</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1894</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20015520$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nardi, Angélica Trevisan De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Real, Amanda Albiero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Tamires Daros dos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of inspiratory muscle training on patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review</title><description>ABSTRACT Studies have shown that among the various techniques that involve chest physical therapy, the inspiratory muscle training (IMT) is essential in the recovery of lung function and in preventing respiratory complications. However, the effect of IMT on patients undergoing bariatric surgery is still inconclusive. The aim of this study was to systematically review randomized and controlled trials that assessed the effect of IMT compared with sham IMT, standard physical therapy (breathing exercises and early ambulation) or no intervention in the lung function on patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, TRIP, PEDro and Scopus databases with no publication year or language limits, following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. From 2,184 potentially eligible studies, two studies were included. Bias risk criteria were adapted and divided into nine main areas using the Cochrane Handbook. This review included 62 participants, being 30 allocated to receive Threshold® IMT device, but in different periods: preoperative and postoperative. IMT promoted increased maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) in relation to standard physical therapy, but no significant differences were found in maximal expiratory pressure (MEP). The studies showed low and unclear bias risk. IMT seems to be the most effective treatment in comparison with standard physical therapy alone in pre- or postoperative period. However, there is no solid evidence for clinical decision-making.</description><subject>FOS: Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Orthopaedics</subject><subject>Rehabilitation and Therapy (excl. Physiotherapy)</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMtqwzAURLXpoqT9gy70A3YlWbKt7kpIHxDoJntxI105glg2ktLiv69Dm9WBYRiGQ8gTZ3XLevk86tqHIZ8gYS0Y40oJdk_sznu0hU6ehpjnkKBMaaHjJdsz0pIgxBAHOkU6QwkYS6aX6DAN0zU-QgpQUrA0X9KAaXmhQPOSC45r29KE3wF_Hsidh3PGx39uyOFtd9h-VPuv98_t675ymrOqaWWLUgoPTq_fLCimEJ3seuCq7zzT3vXMq5VCM26BcXfUVqi2bTrhbbMh8m_WQQEbCpo5hRHSYjgzVwVm1OamwNwUNL9dv1oD</recordid><startdate>20220607</startdate><enddate>20220607</enddate><creator>Nardi, Angélica Trevisan De</creator><creator>Real, Amanda Albiero</creator><creator>Santos, Tamires Daros dos</creator><creator>Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira</creator><creator>Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220607</creationdate><title>Effect of inspiratory muscle training on patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review</title><author>Nardi, Angélica Trevisan De ; Real, Amanda Albiero ; Santos, Tamires Daros dos ; Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira ; Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d910-3646e442fad9552ca505eed478a1587f09fd80f509f2901ca01db9c2566372fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>FOS: Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Orthopaedics</topic><topic>Rehabilitation and Therapy (excl. Physiotherapy)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nardi, Angélica Trevisan De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Real, Amanda Albiero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Tamires Daros dos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nardi, Angélica Trevisan De</au><au>Real, Amanda Albiero</au><au>Santos, Tamires Daros dos</au><au>Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira</au><au>Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Effect of inspiratory muscle training on patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review</title><date>2022-06-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>ABSTRACT Studies have shown that among the various techniques that involve chest physical therapy, the inspiratory muscle training (IMT) is essential in the recovery of lung function and in preventing respiratory complications. However, the effect of IMT on patients undergoing bariatric surgery is still inconclusive. The aim of this study was to systematically review randomized and controlled trials that assessed the effect of IMT compared with sham IMT, standard physical therapy (breathing exercises and early ambulation) or no intervention in the lung function on patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, TRIP, PEDro and Scopus databases with no publication year or language limits, following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. From 2,184 potentially eligible studies, two studies were included. Bias risk criteria were adapted and divided into nine main areas using the Cochrane Handbook. This review included 62 participants, being 30 allocated to receive Threshold® IMT device, but in different periods: preoperative and postoperative. IMT promoted increased maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) in relation to standard physical therapy, but no significant differences were found in maximal expiratory pressure (MEP). The studies showed low and unclear bias risk. IMT seems to be the most effective treatment in comparison with standard physical therapy alone in pre- or postoperative period. However, there is no solid evidence for clinical decision-making.</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.20015520</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20015520
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_20015520
source DataCite
subjects FOS: Clinical medicine
Orthopaedics
Rehabilitation and Therapy (excl. Physiotherapy)
title Effect of inspiratory muscle training on patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A30%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Nardi,%20Ang%C3%A9lica%20Trevisan%20De&rft.date=2022-06-07&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.20015520&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_20015520%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true