Validity Evidence of the Team Psychological Safety Survey

Validity Evidence of the Team Psychological Safety Survey

Abstract The objective of this study was to adapt and investigate validity evidence for the Team Psychological Safety Survey for Brazil and to test its feasibility to emerge at the team level. A sample of 8,310 female workers answered the scale. Initial analyses indicated the single-factor solution...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ramalho, Maria Cecília Koehne, Porto, Juliana Barreiros
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
FOS: Psychology
Psychology not elsewhere classified
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Ramalho, Maria Cecília Koehne
Porto, Juliana Barreiros
description Abstract The objective of this study was to adapt and investigate validity evidence for the Team Psychological Safety Survey for Brazil and to test its feasibility to emerge at the team level. A sample of 8,310 female workers answered the scale. Initial analyses indicated the single-factor solution fitness, with Cronbach’s alpha = 0.84. Confirmatory factor analysis model obtained good fitness coefficients, CFI = 0.995, RMSEA = 0.07. Emersion was viable due to group variance identified by and ICC calculations. The hypothesis stated that psychological safety correlates with perceived organizational practices and that differences exist between men and women’s practices. Findings support that the good practices positively related to psychological safety, with differences between gender, while a negative relationship with bad practices was partially confirmed. A quadratic trend was identified between organizational status and psychological safety. Results provide validity evidence for the survey for samples of Brazilian women.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.20006096
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_20006096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_20006096</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d916-573957c7e76268d89be31895c3ab6e77869fc5fca9f9038c128f10ed66e9f9313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1z81qwzAQBGBdeihp36AHvYBdyYpX2mMJ6Q8EWojJVWykVSyw62K7Ab99U9qcBoZh4BPiQasSlFs_9limfJpaGrmslFKgEG4FHqjLMc-L3J5z5M_Ackhyblk2TL38mJbQDt1wyoE6uafEl-X-ezzzciduEnUT3__nSjTP22bzWuzeX942T7siooaitgZrGyxbqMBFh0c22mEdDB2BrXWAKdQpECZUxgVduaQVRwC-NEablVj_3UaaKeSZ_deYexoXr5X_hfke_RXmrzDzA5RxSTE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Validity Evidence of the Team Psychological Safety Survey</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Ramalho, Maria Cecília Koehne ; Porto, Juliana Barreiros</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramalho, Maria Cecília Koehne ; Porto, Juliana Barreiros</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The objective of this study was to adapt and investigate validity evidence for the Team Psychological Safety Survey for Brazil and to test its feasibility to emerge at the team level. A sample of 8,310 female workers answered the scale. Initial analyses indicated the single-factor solution fitness, with Cronbach’s alpha = 0.84. Confirmatory factor analysis model obtained good fitness coefficients, CFI = 0.995, RMSEA = 0.07. Emersion was viable due to group variance identified by and ICC calculations. The hypothesis stated that psychological safety correlates with perceived organizational practices and that differences exist between men and women’s practices. Findings support that the good practices positively related to psychological safety, with differences between gender, while a negative relationship with bad practices was partially confirmed. A quadratic trend was identified between organizational status and psychological safety. Results provide validity evidence for the survey for samples of Brazilian women.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20006096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>FOS: Psychology ; Psychology not elsewhere classified</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1894</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20006096$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramalho, Maria Cecília Koehne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porto, Juliana Barreiros</creatorcontrib><title>Validity Evidence of the Team Psychological Safety Survey</title><description>Abstract The objective of this study was to adapt and investigate validity evidence for the Team Psychological Safety Survey for Brazil and to test its feasibility to emerge at the team level. A sample of 8,310 female workers answered the scale. Initial analyses indicated the single-factor solution fitness, with Cronbach’s alpha = 0.84. Confirmatory factor analysis model obtained good fitness coefficients, CFI = 0.995, RMSEA = 0.07. Emersion was viable due to group variance identified by and ICC calculations. The hypothesis stated that psychological safety correlates with perceived organizational practices and that differences exist between men and women’s practices. Findings support that the good practices positively related to psychological safety, with differences between gender, while a negative relationship with bad practices was partially confirmed. A quadratic trend was identified between organizational status and psychological safety. Results provide validity evidence for the survey for samples of Brazilian women.</description><subject>FOS: Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology not elsewhere classified</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1z81qwzAQBGBdeihp36AHvYBdyYpX2mMJ6Q8EWojJVWykVSyw62K7Ab99U9qcBoZh4BPiQasSlFs_9limfJpaGrmslFKgEG4FHqjLMc-L3J5z5M_Ackhyblk2TL38mJbQDt1wyoE6uafEl-X-ezzzciduEnUT3__nSjTP22bzWuzeX942T7siooaitgZrGyxbqMBFh0c22mEdDB2BrXWAKdQpECZUxgVduaQVRwC-NEablVj_3UaaKeSZ_deYexoXr5X_hfke_RXmrzDzA5RxSTE</recordid><startdate>20220606</startdate><enddate>20220606</enddate><creator>Ramalho, Maria Cecília Koehne</creator><creator>Porto, Juliana Barreiros</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220606</creationdate><title>Validity Evidence of the Team Psychological Safety Survey</title><author>Ramalho, Maria Cecília Koehne ; Porto, Juliana Barreiros</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d916-573957c7e76268d89be31895c3ab6e77869fc5fca9f9038c128f10ed66e9f9313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>FOS: Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology not elsewhere classified</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramalho, Maria Cecília Koehne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porto, Juliana Barreiros</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramalho, Maria Cecília Koehne</au><au>Porto, Juliana Barreiros</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Validity Evidence of the Team Psychological Safety Survey</title><date>2022-06-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>Abstract The objective of this study was to adapt and investigate validity evidence for the Team Psychological Safety Survey for Brazil and to test its feasibility to emerge at the team level. A sample of 8,310 female workers answered the scale. Initial analyses indicated the single-factor solution fitness, with Cronbach’s alpha = 0.84. Confirmatory factor analysis model obtained good fitness coefficients, CFI = 0.995, RMSEA = 0.07. Emersion was viable due to group variance identified by and ICC calculations. The hypothesis stated that psychological safety correlates with perceived organizational practices and that differences exist between men and women’s practices. Findings support that the good practices positively related to psychological safety, with differences between gender, while a negative relationship with bad practices was partially confirmed. A quadratic trend was identified between organizational status and psychological safety. Results provide validity evidence for the survey for samples of Brazilian women.</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.20006096</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20006096
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_20006096
source DataCite
subjects FOS: Psychology
Psychology not elsewhere classified
title Validity Evidence of the Team Psychological Safety Survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A30%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Ramalho,%20Maria%20Cec%C3%ADlia%20Koehne&rft.date=2022-06-06&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.20006096&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_20006096%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true