New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer

ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate symmetry after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for cancer. Methods: a prospective study of patients undergoing BCS. These patients were photographed using the same criteria of evaluation. The references points used were the nipple height difference (NH), the nipple-ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: VIEIRA, RENÉ ALOISIO DA COSTA, BILLER, GABRIELE, SILVA, FABIOLA CRISTINA BRANDINI DA, SILVA, JONATHAS JOSÉ DA, OLIVEIRA, MARCO ANTÔNIO DE, BAILÃO-JUNIOR, ANTÔNIO
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator VIEIRA, RENÉ ALOISIO DA COSTA
BILLER, GABRIELE
SILVA, FABIOLA CRISTINA BRANDINI DA
SILVA, JONATHAS JOSÉ DA
OLIVEIRA, MARCO ANTÔNIO DE
BAILÃO-JUNIOR, ANTÔNIO
description ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate symmetry after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for cancer. Methods: a prospective study of patients undergoing BCS. These patients were photographed using the same criteria of evaluation. The references points used were the nipple height difference (NH), the nipple-manubrium distances (NM), nipple-sternum distances (NS) and the angle between the intramammary fold and the nipple (nipple angle; NA). ImageJ software was used. Three breast symmetry models were evaluated: excellent/others (model 1), excellent-good/others (model 2) and others/poor (model 3). The ROC curve was used to select acceptable criteria for the evaluation of symmetry. Decision tree model analysis was performed. Results: a total of 274 women were evaluated. The BCCT.core result was excellent in 5.8% (16), good in 24.1% (66), fair in 46.4% (127) and poor in 23.7% (65). The difference in NH was associated with good breast area (0.837-0.846); acceptable differences were below 3.1 cm, while unacceptable values were greater than 6.4 cm. Differences in the NM were associated with average breast area (0.709-0.789); a difference in value of less than 4.5 cm was acceptable, while values greater than 6.3 cm were unacceptable. In the decision tree combined model, a good-excellent outcome for patients with differential (d) dNH = 1 (0 to 5.30 cm) and dNM ≠ 3 ( 6.35). Conclusions: the results presented here are simple tools that can assist the surgeon for breast symmetry evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.19961982
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_19961982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_19961982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d912-4ce524142111de7f826787fea45af6d5f6b3afbcca91d9b66efd7f0e3fa548cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1z79ugzAQx3EvHaq0b9DBLwDFYAweq6j_pKhdoqzWYd9RSwGqM0nF25eozXTL937SR4gHVeSmaPXjYHOKffoCxlxZa5Rty1tx-MAf6TnOyBEkTSw7RkizTMsw4MyLxDMcTzDHaZRAa3YN_DQm5HMce5lO3OOaXt49jB75TtwQHBPe_9-N2L8877dv2e7z9X37tMuCVWWmPdalVrpUSgVsqC1N0zaEoGsgE2oyXQXUeQ9WBdsZgxQaKrAiqHXrqdoI_TcbYAa_Itw3xwF4capwF7UbrLuq3VVd_QKWIla_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>VIEIRA, RENÉ ALOISIO DA COSTA ; BILLER, GABRIELE ; SILVA, FABIOLA CRISTINA BRANDINI DA ; SILVA, JONATHAS JOSÉ DA ; OLIVEIRA, MARCO ANTÔNIO DE ; BAILÃO-JUNIOR, ANTÔNIO</creator><creatorcontrib>VIEIRA, RENÉ ALOISIO DA COSTA ; BILLER, GABRIELE ; SILVA, FABIOLA CRISTINA BRANDINI DA ; SILVA, JONATHAS JOSÉ DA ; OLIVEIRA, MARCO ANTÔNIO DE ; BAILÃO-JUNIOR, ANTÔNIO</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate symmetry after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for cancer. Methods: a prospective study of patients undergoing BCS. These patients were photographed using the same criteria of evaluation. The references points used were the nipple height difference (NH), the nipple-manubrium distances (NM), nipple-sternum distances (NS) and the angle between the intramammary fold and the nipple (nipple angle; NA). ImageJ software was used. Three breast symmetry models were evaluated: excellent/others (model 1), excellent-good/others (model 2) and others/poor (model 3). The ROC curve was used to select acceptable criteria for the evaluation of symmetry. Decision tree model analysis was performed. Results: a total of 274 women were evaluated. The BCCT.core result was excellent in 5.8% (16), good in 24.1% (66), fair in 46.4% (127) and poor in 23.7% (65). The difference in NH was associated with good breast area (0.837-0.846); acceptable differences were below 3.1 cm, while unacceptable values were greater than 6.4 cm. Differences in the NM were associated with average breast area (0.709-0.789); a difference in value of less than 4.5 cm was acceptable, while values greater than 6.3 cm were unacceptable. In the decision tree combined model, a good-excellent outcome for patients with differential (d) dNH = 1 (0 to 5.30 cm) and dNM ≠ 3 (&lt;6.28 cm); and for a poor/poor result, values dNM = 3 (&gt; 6.35). Conclusions: the results presented here are simple tools that can assist the surgeon for breast symmetry evaluation.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19961982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>FOS: Clinical medicine ; Surgery</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1894</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19961982$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>VIEIRA, RENÉ ALOISIO DA COSTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BILLER, GABRIELE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SILVA, FABIOLA CRISTINA BRANDINI DA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SILVA, JONATHAS JOSÉ DA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OLIVEIRA, MARCO ANTÔNIO DE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAILÃO-JUNIOR, ANTÔNIO</creatorcontrib><title>New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer</title><description>ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate symmetry after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for cancer. Methods: a prospective study of patients undergoing BCS. These patients were photographed using the same criteria of evaluation. The references points used were the nipple height difference (NH), the nipple-manubrium distances (NM), nipple-sternum distances (NS) and the angle between the intramammary fold and the nipple (nipple angle; NA). ImageJ software was used. Three breast symmetry models were evaluated: excellent/others (model 1), excellent-good/others (model 2) and others/poor (model 3). The ROC curve was used to select acceptable criteria for the evaluation of symmetry. Decision tree model analysis was performed. Results: a total of 274 women were evaluated. The BCCT.core result was excellent in 5.8% (16), good in 24.1% (66), fair in 46.4% (127) and poor in 23.7% (65). The difference in NH was associated with good breast area (0.837-0.846); acceptable differences were below 3.1 cm, while unacceptable values were greater than 6.4 cm. Differences in the NM were associated with average breast area (0.709-0.789); a difference in value of less than 4.5 cm was acceptable, while values greater than 6.3 cm were unacceptable. In the decision tree combined model, a good-excellent outcome for patients with differential (d) dNH = 1 (0 to 5.30 cm) and dNM ≠ 3 (&lt;6.28 cm); and for a poor/poor result, values dNM = 3 (&gt; 6.35). Conclusions: the results presented here are simple tools that can assist the surgeon for breast symmetry evaluation.</description><subject>FOS: Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1z79ugzAQx3EvHaq0b9DBLwDFYAweq6j_pKhdoqzWYd9RSwGqM0nF25eozXTL937SR4gHVeSmaPXjYHOKffoCxlxZa5Rty1tx-MAf6TnOyBEkTSw7RkizTMsw4MyLxDMcTzDHaZRAa3YN_DQm5HMce5lO3OOaXt49jB75TtwQHBPe_9-N2L8877dv2e7z9X37tMuCVWWmPdalVrpUSgVsqC1N0zaEoGsgE2oyXQXUeQ9WBdsZgxQaKrAiqHXrqdoI_TcbYAa_Itw3xwF4capwF7UbrLuq3VVd_QKWIla_</recordid><startdate>20220602</startdate><enddate>20220602</enddate><creator>VIEIRA, RENÉ ALOISIO DA COSTA</creator><creator>BILLER, GABRIELE</creator><creator>SILVA, FABIOLA CRISTINA BRANDINI DA</creator><creator>SILVA, JONATHAS JOSÉ DA</creator><creator>OLIVEIRA, MARCO ANTÔNIO DE</creator><creator>BAILÃO-JUNIOR, ANTÔNIO</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220602</creationdate><title>New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer</title><author>VIEIRA, RENÉ ALOISIO DA COSTA ; BILLER, GABRIELE ; SILVA, FABIOLA CRISTINA BRANDINI DA ; SILVA, JONATHAS JOSÉ DA ; OLIVEIRA, MARCO ANTÔNIO DE ; BAILÃO-JUNIOR, ANTÔNIO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d912-4ce524142111de7f826787fea45af6d5f6b3afbcca91d9b66efd7f0e3fa548cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>FOS: Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VIEIRA, RENÉ ALOISIO DA COSTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BILLER, GABRIELE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SILVA, FABIOLA CRISTINA BRANDINI DA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SILVA, JONATHAS JOSÉ DA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OLIVEIRA, MARCO ANTÔNIO DE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAILÃO-JUNIOR, ANTÔNIO</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VIEIRA, RENÉ ALOISIO DA COSTA</au><au>BILLER, GABRIELE</au><au>SILVA, FABIOLA CRISTINA BRANDINI DA</au><au>SILVA, JONATHAS JOSÉ DA</au><au>OLIVEIRA, MARCO ANTÔNIO DE</au><au>BAILÃO-JUNIOR, ANTÔNIO</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer</title><date>2022-06-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate symmetry after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for cancer. Methods: a prospective study of patients undergoing BCS. These patients were photographed using the same criteria of evaluation. The references points used were the nipple height difference (NH), the nipple-manubrium distances (NM), nipple-sternum distances (NS) and the angle between the intramammary fold and the nipple (nipple angle; NA). ImageJ software was used. Three breast symmetry models were evaluated: excellent/others (model 1), excellent-good/others (model 2) and others/poor (model 3). The ROC curve was used to select acceptable criteria for the evaluation of symmetry. Decision tree model analysis was performed. Results: a total of 274 women were evaluated. The BCCT.core result was excellent in 5.8% (16), good in 24.1% (66), fair in 46.4% (127) and poor in 23.7% (65). The difference in NH was associated with good breast area (0.837-0.846); acceptable differences were below 3.1 cm, while unacceptable values were greater than 6.4 cm. Differences in the NM were associated with average breast area (0.709-0.789); a difference in value of less than 4.5 cm was acceptable, while values greater than 6.3 cm were unacceptable. In the decision tree combined model, a good-excellent outcome for patients with differential (d) dNH = 1 (0 to 5.30 cm) and dNM ≠ 3 (&lt;6.28 cm); and for a poor/poor result, values dNM = 3 (&gt; 6.35). Conclusions: the results presented here are simple tools that can assist the surgeon for breast symmetry evaluation.</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.19961982</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19961982
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_19961982
source DataCite
subjects FOS: Clinical medicine
Surgery
title New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T07%3A22%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=VIEIRA,%20REN%C3%89%20ALOISIO%20DA%20COSTA&rft.date=2022-06-02&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.19961982&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_19961982%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true