Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction

ABSTRACT Objectives: to assess the degree of patient satisfaction after undergoing breast augmentation and compare three different, easy, inexpensive and universal methods of preoperative choice of breast implant volume. Methods: a prospective study was carried out at University Hospital Pedro Ernes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: MOTTA, RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZA, ROXO, ANA CLAUDIA WECK, NAHAS, FABIO XERFAN, SERRA-GUIMARÃES, FERNANDO
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator MOTTA, RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZA
ROXO, ANA CLAUDIA WECK
NAHAS, FABIO XERFAN
SERRA-GUIMARÃES, FERNANDO
description ABSTRACT Objectives: to assess the degree of patient satisfaction after undergoing breast augmentation and compare three different, easy, inexpensive and universal methods of preoperative choice of breast implant volume. Methods: a prospective study was carried out at University Hospital Pedro Ernesto of State University of Rio de Janeiro, in 94 women from Rio de Janeiro, aged 18 to 49 years, submitted to breast augmentation mammaplasty with breast implant due to hypomastia. All implants were textured, with a round base and high projection and were introduced into the retroglandular space through an inframammary access. The patients were divided into three groups: Control, Silicone and MamaSize®, with 44, 25 and 25 patients, respectively. Satisfaction questionnaires were applied in the pre and postoperative periods by the same evaluator, through the visual analogue scale, in which ‘0’ meant very unsatisfied and ‘100’ very satisfied for the four variables: shape, size, symmetry and consistency. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical scar was also assessed in the postoperative period. Results: when the preoperative and postoperative satisfaction levels were compared, there was a difference in all variables for the three groups, with statistical significance. However, when the postoperative data were compared with each other, there was no significant difference. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical scar was high. Conclusion: the augmentation mammaplasty with breast implant had a high index of satisfaction among patients. However, there was no difference in the degree of satisfaction in the postoperative period between the three methodologies of breast volume measurement.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.19961893
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_19961893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_19961893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d913-9c0e9c0f92cd4755ab46dad91158c4c2544e797095c0c3b2a116c4dc5219c8923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kL1qwzAUhb10KGnfoINewK5lS7Y1htA_CHTJLq6vrmKBZRlJTenb16HNcPiGczjDVxRPvK66ehDPXlXWndMEkSquVMcH1d4X_hD8CtGlsLCR8jfRwoyzliItmXnKUzCJBcvGSJAyc36dYWsuYf7yxHAKDonBYpihcyS6TteQclgpQnYXYmlDsoDZheWhuLMwJ3r85644vb6cDu_l8fPt47A_lkbxtlRY0xarGjSilxJG0RnYKi4HFNhIIahXfa0k1tiODXDeoTAoG65wUE27K8TfrYEM6DLpNToP8UfzWl9laK_0TYa-yWh_AbtOXf8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>MOTTA, RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZA ; ROXO, ANA CLAUDIA WECK ; NAHAS, FABIO XERFAN ; SERRA-GUIMARÃES, FERNANDO</creator><creatorcontrib>MOTTA, RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZA ; ROXO, ANA CLAUDIA WECK ; NAHAS, FABIO XERFAN ; SERRA-GUIMARÃES, FERNANDO</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objectives: to assess the degree of patient satisfaction after undergoing breast augmentation and compare three different, easy, inexpensive and universal methods of preoperative choice of breast implant volume. Methods: a prospective study was carried out at University Hospital Pedro Ernesto of State University of Rio de Janeiro, in 94 women from Rio de Janeiro, aged 18 to 49 years, submitted to breast augmentation mammaplasty with breast implant due to hypomastia. All implants were textured, with a round base and high projection and were introduced into the retroglandular space through an inframammary access. The patients were divided into three groups: Control, Silicone and MamaSize®, with 44, 25 and 25 patients, respectively. Satisfaction questionnaires were applied in the pre and postoperative periods by the same evaluator, through the visual analogue scale, in which ‘0’ meant very unsatisfied and ‘100’ very satisfied for the four variables: shape, size, symmetry and consistency. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical scar was also assessed in the postoperative period. Results: when the preoperative and postoperative satisfaction levels were compared, there was a difference in all variables for the three groups, with statistical significance. However, when the postoperative data were compared with each other, there was no significant difference. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical scar was high. Conclusion: the augmentation mammaplasty with breast implant had a high index of satisfaction among patients. However, there was no difference in the degree of satisfaction in the postoperative period between the three methodologies of breast volume measurement.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19961893</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>FOS: Clinical medicine ; Surgery</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19961893$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>MOTTA, RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROXO, ANA CLAUDIA WECK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAHAS, FABIO XERFAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SERRA-GUIMARÃES, FERNANDO</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction</title><description>ABSTRACT Objectives: to assess the degree of patient satisfaction after undergoing breast augmentation and compare three different, easy, inexpensive and universal methods of preoperative choice of breast implant volume. Methods: a prospective study was carried out at University Hospital Pedro Ernesto of State University of Rio de Janeiro, in 94 women from Rio de Janeiro, aged 18 to 49 years, submitted to breast augmentation mammaplasty with breast implant due to hypomastia. All implants were textured, with a round base and high projection and were introduced into the retroglandular space through an inframammary access. The patients were divided into three groups: Control, Silicone and MamaSize®, with 44, 25 and 25 patients, respectively. Satisfaction questionnaires were applied in the pre and postoperative periods by the same evaluator, through the visual analogue scale, in which ‘0’ meant very unsatisfied and ‘100’ very satisfied for the four variables: shape, size, symmetry and consistency. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical scar was also assessed in the postoperative period. Results: when the preoperative and postoperative satisfaction levels were compared, there was a difference in all variables for the three groups, with statistical significance. However, when the postoperative data were compared with each other, there was no significant difference. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical scar was high. Conclusion: the augmentation mammaplasty with breast implant had a high index of satisfaction among patients. However, there was no difference in the degree of satisfaction in the postoperative period between the three methodologies of breast volume measurement.</description><subject>FOS: Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kL1qwzAUhb10KGnfoINewK5lS7Y1htA_CHTJLq6vrmKBZRlJTenb16HNcPiGczjDVxRPvK66ehDPXlXWndMEkSquVMcH1d4X_hD8CtGlsLCR8jfRwoyzliItmXnKUzCJBcvGSJAyc36dYWsuYf7yxHAKDonBYpihcyS6TteQclgpQnYXYmlDsoDZheWhuLMwJ3r85644vb6cDu_l8fPt47A_lkbxtlRY0xarGjSilxJG0RnYKi4HFNhIIahXfa0k1tiODXDeoTAoG65wUE27K8TfrYEM6DLpNToP8UfzWl9laK_0TYa-yWh_AbtOXf8</recordid><startdate>20220602</startdate><enddate>20220602</enddate><creator>MOTTA, RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZA</creator><creator>ROXO, ANA CLAUDIA WECK</creator><creator>NAHAS, FABIO XERFAN</creator><creator>SERRA-GUIMARÃES, FERNANDO</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220602</creationdate><title>Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction</title><author>MOTTA, RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZA ; ROXO, ANA CLAUDIA WECK ; NAHAS, FABIO XERFAN ; SERRA-GUIMARÃES, FERNANDO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d913-9c0e9c0f92cd4755ab46dad91158c4c2544e797095c0c3b2a116c4dc5219c8923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>FOS: Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MOTTA, RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROXO, ANA CLAUDIA WECK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAHAS, FABIO XERFAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SERRA-GUIMARÃES, FERNANDO</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MOTTA, RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZA</au><au>ROXO, ANA CLAUDIA WECK</au><au>NAHAS, FABIO XERFAN</au><au>SERRA-GUIMARÃES, FERNANDO</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction</title><date>2022-06-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>ABSTRACT Objectives: to assess the degree of patient satisfaction after undergoing breast augmentation and compare three different, easy, inexpensive and universal methods of preoperative choice of breast implant volume. Methods: a prospective study was carried out at University Hospital Pedro Ernesto of State University of Rio de Janeiro, in 94 women from Rio de Janeiro, aged 18 to 49 years, submitted to breast augmentation mammaplasty with breast implant due to hypomastia. All implants were textured, with a round base and high projection and were introduced into the retroglandular space through an inframammary access. The patients were divided into three groups: Control, Silicone and MamaSize®, with 44, 25 and 25 patients, respectively. Satisfaction questionnaires were applied in the pre and postoperative periods by the same evaluator, through the visual analogue scale, in which ‘0’ meant very unsatisfied and ‘100’ very satisfied for the four variables: shape, size, symmetry and consistency. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical scar was also assessed in the postoperative period. Results: when the preoperative and postoperative satisfaction levels were compared, there was a difference in all variables for the three groups, with statistical significance. However, when the postoperative data were compared with each other, there was no significant difference. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical scar was high. Conclusion: the augmentation mammaplasty with breast implant had a high index of satisfaction among patients. However, there was no difference in the degree of satisfaction in the postoperative period between the three methodologies of breast volume measurement.</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.19961893</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19961893
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_19961893
source DataCite
subjects FOS: Clinical medicine
Surgery
title Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T08%3A03%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=MOTTA,%20RAFAEL%20DAIBERT%20DE%20SOUZA&rft.date=2022-06-02&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.19961893&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_19961893%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true