Ventricular Synchrony in Para-Hisian Cardiac Pacing as an Alternative for Physiological Cardiac Activation (Indirect Recruitment of the His Bundle?)

Abstract Background Artificial cardiac pacing by direct or indirect His bundle capture results in synchronous ventricular contraction (physiological pacing). Objectives To compare cardiac synchronization, technical characteristics, and electronic parameters between two techniques of indirect His-bun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ferrari, Andres Di Leoni, Gazzoni, Guilherme Ferreira, Domingues, Luis Manuel Ley, Willes, Jessica Caroline Feltrin, Cabral, Gustavo Chiari, Ferreira, Flavio Vinicius Costa, Lodi, Laura Orlandini, Reis, Gustavo
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Ferrari, Andres Di Leoni
Gazzoni, Guilherme Ferreira
Domingues, Luis Manuel Ley
Willes, Jessica Caroline Feltrin
Cabral, Gustavo Chiari
Ferreira, Flavio Vinicius Costa
Lodi, Laura Orlandini
Reis, Gustavo
description Abstract Background Artificial cardiac pacing by direct or indirect His bundle capture results in synchronous ventricular contraction (physiological pacing). Objectives To compare cardiac synchronization, technical characteristics, and electronic parameters between two techniques of indirect His-bundle pacing: non-selective (NS-HBP) vs para-Hisian pacing (PHP). Methods The experimental intervention (between November 2019 and April 2020) consisted of implanting a DDD pacemaker in patients who had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 35%. The resulting cardiac synchronization was compared using an electrocardiographic algorithm that analyzed QRS variation and the technical characteristics of non-selective Hisian pacing (DDD-His) and para-Hisian pacing (DDD-Var). Results Of 51 total patients (men: 28), 66.7% (34) were allocated to the DDD-Var group and 33.3% (17) to the DDD-His group. The mean ages in each group were 74 and 79 years, respectively. In the DDD-Var group, QRS variation (ventricular synchrony) improved after implantation (p < 0.001). In post-implantation ECG, 91.2% of the DDD-Var group presented a physiological pacing pattern, which was similar to the DDD-His group (88.2%; p = 0.999). The paced QRS axis was also similar (physiological) for both groups. Intraoperative fluoroscopy time (XRay) during implantation was lower for the para-Hisian technique (median 7 min in the DDD-Var group vs 21 min in the DDD-His group, p < 0.001). The mean QRS duration increased in the DDD-Var group (114.7 ms pre-implantation vs 128.2 ms post-implantation, p = 0.044). The mean post-implantation R-wave amplitude was 11.2 mV in the DDD-Var group vs 6.0 mV in the DDD-His group, p = 0.001. Conclusion Para-Hisian pacing appears to indirectly recruit the His bundle, which would make this an effective and comparable strategy for physiological pacing, resulting in synchronous ventricular contraction similar to that of non-selective Hisian pacing.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.19941379
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_19941379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_19941379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d919-9d508c06498df3132e89cd70867e8f74f8e4186acfa29082170d566d010e3aa43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFOwzAQRHPhgAp_wGGPcEixGzexT6hUQCtVooKKa7Sy142lxEGOg5T_4IMxouU00mh2R_Oy7IazecmkuO_U3Lrj0GCgOVdK8KJSl9n3B_kYnB5bDPA-ed2E3k_gPOwxYL5xg0MPawzGoU6edv4IOEAyV22k4DG6LwLbB9g30-D6tj86je3_yUqnQAr1Hm633rhAOsIb6TC62KVu6C3EhiA1wePoTUsPd1fZhcV2oOuTzrLD89Nhvcl3ry_b9WqXG8VVrsySSc1KoaSxBS8WJJU2FZNlRdJWwkoSXJaoLS4UkwteMbMsS8M4owJRFLNM_L01GNOwSPVncB2Gqeas_mVWd6o-M6vPzIofbdFqAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Ventricular Synchrony in Para-Hisian Cardiac Pacing as an Alternative for Physiological Cardiac Activation (Indirect Recruitment of the His Bundle?)</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Ferrari, Andres Di Leoni ; Gazzoni, Guilherme Ferreira ; Domingues, Luis Manuel Ley ; Willes, Jessica Caroline Feltrin ; Cabral, Gustavo Chiari ; Ferreira, Flavio Vinicius Costa ; Lodi, Laura Orlandini ; Reis, Gustavo</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Andres Di Leoni ; Gazzoni, Guilherme Ferreira ; Domingues, Luis Manuel Ley ; Willes, Jessica Caroline Feltrin ; Cabral, Gustavo Chiari ; Ferreira, Flavio Vinicius Costa ; Lodi, Laura Orlandini ; Reis, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Artificial cardiac pacing by direct or indirect His bundle capture results in synchronous ventricular contraction (physiological pacing). Objectives To compare cardiac synchronization, technical characteristics, and electronic parameters between two techniques of indirect His-bundle pacing: non-selective (NS-HBP) vs para-Hisian pacing (PHP). Methods The experimental intervention (between November 2019 and April 2020) consisted of implanting a DDD pacemaker in patients who had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &gt; 35%. The resulting cardiac synchronization was compared using an electrocardiographic algorithm that analyzed QRS variation and the technical characteristics of non-selective Hisian pacing (DDD-His) and para-Hisian pacing (DDD-Var). Results Of 51 total patients (men: 28), 66.7% (34) were allocated to the DDD-Var group and 33.3% (17) to the DDD-His group. The mean ages in each group were 74 and 79 years, respectively. In the DDD-Var group, QRS variation (ventricular synchrony) improved after implantation (p &lt; 0.001). In post-implantation ECG, 91.2% of the DDD-Var group presented a physiological pacing pattern, which was similar to the DDD-His group (88.2%; p = 0.999). The paced QRS axis was also similar (physiological) for both groups. Intraoperative fluoroscopy time (XRay) during implantation was lower for the para-Hisian technique (median 7 min in the DDD-Var group vs 21 min in the DDD-His group, p &lt; 0.001). The mean QRS duration increased in the DDD-Var group (114.7 ms pre-implantation vs 128.2 ms post-implantation, p = 0.044). The mean post-implantation R-wave amplitude was 11.2 mV in the DDD-Var group vs 6.0 mV in the DDD-His group, p = 0.001. Conclusion Para-Hisian pacing appears to indirectly recruit the His bundle, which would make this an effective and comparable strategy for physiological pacing, resulting in synchronous ventricular contraction similar to that of non-selective Hisian pacing.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19941379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>Cardiology</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19941379$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Andres Di Leoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazzoni, Guilherme Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domingues, Luis Manuel Ley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willes, Jessica Caroline Feltrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabral, Gustavo Chiari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Flavio Vinicius Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodi, Laura Orlandini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><title>Ventricular Synchrony in Para-Hisian Cardiac Pacing as an Alternative for Physiological Cardiac Activation (Indirect Recruitment of the His Bundle?)</title><description>Abstract Background Artificial cardiac pacing by direct or indirect His bundle capture results in synchronous ventricular contraction (physiological pacing). Objectives To compare cardiac synchronization, technical characteristics, and electronic parameters between two techniques of indirect His-bundle pacing: non-selective (NS-HBP) vs para-Hisian pacing (PHP). Methods The experimental intervention (between November 2019 and April 2020) consisted of implanting a DDD pacemaker in patients who had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &gt; 35%. The resulting cardiac synchronization was compared using an electrocardiographic algorithm that analyzed QRS variation and the technical characteristics of non-selective Hisian pacing (DDD-His) and para-Hisian pacing (DDD-Var). Results Of 51 total patients (men: 28), 66.7% (34) were allocated to the DDD-Var group and 33.3% (17) to the DDD-His group. The mean ages in each group were 74 and 79 years, respectively. In the DDD-Var group, QRS variation (ventricular synchrony) improved after implantation (p &lt; 0.001). In post-implantation ECG, 91.2% of the DDD-Var group presented a physiological pacing pattern, which was similar to the DDD-His group (88.2%; p = 0.999). The paced QRS axis was also similar (physiological) for both groups. Intraoperative fluoroscopy time (XRay) during implantation was lower for the para-Hisian technique (median 7 min in the DDD-Var group vs 21 min in the DDD-His group, p &lt; 0.001). The mean QRS duration increased in the DDD-Var group (114.7 ms pre-implantation vs 128.2 ms post-implantation, p = 0.044). The mean post-implantation R-wave amplitude was 11.2 mV in the DDD-Var group vs 6.0 mV in the DDD-His group, p = 0.001. Conclusion Para-Hisian pacing appears to indirectly recruit the His bundle, which would make this an effective and comparable strategy for physiological pacing, resulting in synchronous ventricular contraction similar to that of non-selective Hisian pacing.</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMFOwzAQRHPhgAp_wGGPcEixGzexT6hUQCtVooKKa7Sy142lxEGOg5T_4IMxouU00mh2R_Oy7IazecmkuO_U3Lrj0GCgOVdK8KJSl9n3B_kYnB5bDPA-ed2E3k_gPOwxYL5xg0MPawzGoU6edv4IOEAyV22k4DG6LwLbB9g30-D6tj86je3_yUqnQAr1Hm633rhAOsIb6TC62KVu6C3EhiA1wePoTUsPd1fZhcV2oOuTzrLD89Nhvcl3ry_b9WqXG8VVrsySSc1KoaSxBS8WJJU2FZNlRdJWwkoSXJaoLS4UkwteMbMsS8M4owJRFLNM_L01GNOwSPVncB2Gqeas_mVWd6o-M6vPzIofbdFqAw</recordid><startdate>20220531</startdate><enddate>20220531</enddate><creator>Ferrari, Andres Di Leoni</creator><creator>Gazzoni, Guilherme Ferreira</creator><creator>Domingues, Luis Manuel Ley</creator><creator>Willes, Jessica Caroline Feltrin</creator><creator>Cabral, Gustavo Chiari</creator><creator>Ferreira, Flavio Vinicius Costa</creator><creator>Lodi, Laura Orlandini</creator><creator>Reis, Gustavo</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220531</creationdate><title>Ventricular Synchrony in Para-Hisian Cardiac Pacing as an Alternative for Physiological Cardiac Activation (Indirect Recruitment of the His Bundle?)</title><author>Ferrari, Andres Di Leoni ; Gazzoni, Guilherme Ferreira ; Domingues, Luis Manuel Ley ; Willes, Jessica Caroline Feltrin ; Cabral, Gustavo Chiari ; Ferreira, Flavio Vinicius Costa ; Lodi, Laura Orlandini ; Reis, Gustavo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d919-9d508c06498df3132e89cd70867e8f74f8e4186acfa29082170d566d010e3aa43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Andres Di Leoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazzoni, Guilherme Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domingues, Luis Manuel Ley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willes, Jessica Caroline Feltrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabral, Gustavo Chiari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Flavio Vinicius Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodi, Laura Orlandini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferrari, Andres Di Leoni</au><au>Gazzoni, Guilherme Ferreira</au><au>Domingues, Luis Manuel Ley</au><au>Willes, Jessica Caroline Feltrin</au><au>Cabral, Gustavo Chiari</au><au>Ferreira, Flavio Vinicius Costa</au><au>Lodi, Laura Orlandini</au><au>Reis, Gustavo</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Ventricular Synchrony in Para-Hisian Cardiac Pacing as an Alternative for Physiological Cardiac Activation (Indirect Recruitment of the His Bundle?)</title><date>2022-05-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>Abstract Background Artificial cardiac pacing by direct or indirect His bundle capture results in synchronous ventricular contraction (physiological pacing). Objectives To compare cardiac synchronization, technical characteristics, and electronic parameters between two techniques of indirect His-bundle pacing: non-selective (NS-HBP) vs para-Hisian pacing (PHP). Methods The experimental intervention (between November 2019 and April 2020) consisted of implanting a DDD pacemaker in patients who had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &gt; 35%. The resulting cardiac synchronization was compared using an electrocardiographic algorithm that analyzed QRS variation and the technical characteristics of non-selective Hisian pacing (DDD-His) and para-Hisian pacing (DDD-Var). Results Of 51 total patients (men: 28), 66.7% (34) were allocated to the DDD-Var group and 33.3% (17) to the DDD-His group. The mean ages in each group were 74 and 79 years, respectively. In the DDD-Var group, QRS variation (ventricular synchrony) improved after implantation (p &lt; 0.001). In post-implantation ECG, 91.2% of the DDD-Var group presented a physiological pacing pattern, which was similar to the DDD-His group (88.2%; p = 0.999). The paced QRS axis was also similar (physiological) for both groups. Intraoperative fluoroscopy time (XRay) during implantation was lower for the para-Hisian technique (median 7 min in the DDD-Var group vs 21 min in the DDD-His group, p &lt; 0.001). The mean QRS duration increased in the DDD-Var group (114.7 ms pre-implantation vs 128.2 ms post-implantation, p = 0.044). The mean post-implantation R-wave amplitude was 11.2 mV in the DDD-Var group vs 6.0 mV in the DDD-His group, p = 0.001. Conclusion Para-Hisian pacing appears to indirectly recruit the His bundle, which would make this an effective and comparable strategy for physiological pacing, resulting in synchronous ventricular contraction similar to that of non-selective Hisian pacing.</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.19941379</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19941379
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_19941379
source DataCite
subjects Cardiology
title Ventricular Synchrony in Para-Hisian Cardiac Pacing as an Alternative for Physiological Cardiac Activation (Indirect Recruitment of the His Bundle?)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A02%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Ferrari,%20Andres%20Di%20Leoni&rft.date=2022-05-31&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.19941379&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_19941379%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true