INNOVATING IN UNIVERSITY: A REAL ALTERNATIVE OR ALWAYS THE SAME THING?

ABSTRACT Research in the educational field on implicit theories suggests that the nature of innovations in university teaching contexts depends, to a large extent, on what theories teachers have constructed about what it means to learn, teach and innovate. Our main objective was to analyze the impli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Chavez, Jorge, Jiménez, Felipe, Fauré, Jaime
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Chavez, Jorge
Jiménez, Felipe
Fauré, Jaime
description ABSTRACT Research in the educational field on implicit theories suggests that the nature of innovations in university teaching contexts depends, to a large extent, on what theories teachers have constructed about what it means to learn, teach and innovate. Our main objective was to analyze the implicit theories of a group of twelve professors who presented innovation projects in a Chilean university. Following a qualitative approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with each of these teachers, who were responsible for the projects. Our results suggest that teachers conceive learning, teaching and innovation from a series of constructivist notions. However, at the moment of foreseeing the instructional design of their projects they fail on identifying the manner in which these aspects should be concretized in practice. We discuss implications of these results for both research and educational practices.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.19923609
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_19923609</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_19923609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d919-7c456ebcd9c545b9e10afedba6b94c851b8e1550a0425ca62a5d1f188bf232223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j81KxDAAhHPxIKtv4CEv0JqkSW28SFiyu4FuCm2s7CnkVwsWpLsX396K7mlmYGbgA-ABo7JGDX2ceZmn9_OHW1KJOSdVjfgt2Cmtu1EYpfdQafiq1Sj7QZnTMxSwl6KFojWy12tjlLDr1_gmTgM0BwkHcZSrWacvd-Amu89zuv_XDTA7abaHou32aivaInLMi6dAWZ18iDwwyjxPGLmcone15zQ0DPsmYcaQQ5Sw4GriWMQZN43PpCKEVBtA_26ju7gwXZL9WqbZLd8WI_tLaWdur5T2Sln9AGIHR9M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>INNOVATING IN UNIVERSITY: A REAL ALTERNATIVE OR ALWAYS THE SAME THING?</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Chavez, Jorge ; Jiménez, Felipe ; Fauré, Jaime</creator><creatorcontrib>Chavez, Jorge ; Jiménez, Felipe ; Fauré, Jaime</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Research in the educational field on implicit theories suggests that the nature of innovations in university teaching contexts depends, to a large extent, on what theories teachers have constructed about what it means to learn, teach and innovate. Our main objective was to analyze the implicit theories of a group of twelve professors who presented innovation projects in a Chilean university. Following a qualitative approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with each of these teachers, who were responsible for the projects. Our results suggest that teachers conceive learning, teaching and innovation from a series of constructivist notions. However, at the moment of foreseeing the instructional design of their projects they fail on identifying the manner in which these aspects should be concretized in practice. We discuss implications of these results for both research and educational practices.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19923609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>Educational Psychology ; FOS: Psychology</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1887</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19923609$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chavez, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fauré, Jaime</creatorcontrib><title>INNOVATING IN UNIVERSITY: A REAL ALTERNATIVE OR ALWAYS THE SAME THING?</title><description>ABSTRACT Research in the educational field on implicit theories suggests that the nature of innovations in university teaching contexts depends, to a large extent, on what theories teachers have constructed about what it means to learn, teach and innovate. Our main objective was to analyze the implicit theories of a group of twelve professors who presented innovation projects in a Chilean university. Following a qualitative approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with each of these teachers, who were responsible for the projects. Our results suggest that teachers conceive learning, teaching and innovation from a series of constructivist notions. However, at the moment of foreseeing the instructional design of their projects they fail on identifying the manner in which these aspects should be concretized in practice. We discuss implications of these results for both research and educational practices.</description><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>FOS: Psychology</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j81KxDAAhHPxIKtv4CEv0JqkSW28SFiyu4FuCm2s7CnkVwsWpLsX396K7mlmYGbgA-ABo7JGDX2ceZmn9_OHW1KJOSdVjfgt2Cmtu1EYpfdQafiq1Sj7QZnTMxSwl6KFojWy12tjlLDr1_gmTgM0BwkHcZSrWacvd-Amu89zuv_XDTA7abaHou32aivaInLMi6dAWZ18iDwwyjxPGLmcone15zQ0DPsmYcaQQ5Sw4GriWMQZN43PpCKEVBtA_26ju7gwXZL9WqbZLd8WI_tLaWdur5T2Sln9AGIHR9M</recordid><startdate>20220530</startdate><enddate>20220530</enddate><creator>Chavez, Jorge</creator><creator>Jiménez, Felipe</creator><creator>Fauré, Jaime</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220530</creationdate><title>INNOVATING IN UNIVERSITY: A REAL ALTERNATIVE OR ALWAYS THE SAME THING?</title><author>Chavez, Jorge ; Jiménez, Felipe ; Fauré, Jaime</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d919-7c456ebcd9c545b9e10afedba6b94c851b8e1550a0425ca62a5d1f188bf232223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>FOS: Psychology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chavez, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fauré, Jaime</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chavez, Jorge</au><au>Jiménez, Felipe</au><au>Fauré, Jaime</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>INNOVATING IN UNIVERSITY: A REAL ALTERNATIVE OR ALWAYS THE SAME THING?</title><date>2022-05-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>ABSTRACT Research in the educational field on implicit theories suggests that the nature of innovations in university teaching contexts depends, to a large extent, on what theories teachers have constructed about what it means to learn, teach and innovate. Our main objective was to analyze the implicit theories of a group of twelve professors who presented innovation projects in a Chilean university. Following a qualitative approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with each of these teachers, who were responsible for the projects. Our results suggest that teachers conceive learning, teaching and innovation from a series of constructivist notions. However, at the moment of foreseeing the instructional design of their projects they fail on identifying the manner in which these aspects should be concretized in practice. We discuss implications of these results for both research and educational practices.</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.19923609</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19923609
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_19923609
source DataCite
subjects Educational Psychology
FOS: Psychology
title INNOVATING IN UNIVERSITY: A REAL ALTERNATIVE OR ALWAYS THE SAME THING?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T02%3A47%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Chavez,%20Jorge&rft.date=2022-05-30&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.19923609&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_19923609%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true