Feldspathic and Lithium Disilicate Onlays with a 2-Year Follow-Up: Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract The present study was a prospective, controlled, randomized, clinical short-term trial aiming to evaluate the clinical performance of adhesively luted, lithium disilicate and feldspathic glass-ceramics onlays over a period up to 2 years. A total of 11 patients (7 female, 4 male; age range:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Saavedra, Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni, Tribst, João Paulo Mendes, Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho, Melo, Renata Marques de, Rodrigues, Vinícius Anéas, Ramos, Gabriela Freitas, Bottino, Marco Antonio
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Saavedra, Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni
Tribst, João Paulo Mendes
Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho
Melo, Renata Marques de
Rodrigues, Vinícius Anéas
Ramos, Gabriela Freitas
Bottino, Marco Antonio
description Abstract The present study was a prospective, controlled, randomized, clinical short-term trial aiming to evaluate the clinical performance of adhesively luted, lithium disilicate and feldspathic glass-ceramics onlays over a period up to 2 years. A total of 11 patients (7 female, 4 male; age range: 18-60 years, mean age: 39 years) were selected for this study. Each patient received a maximum of two restorations per group in a split-mouth-design. LD: Eleven onlays, performed with lithium disilicate-based ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), and FP: Eleven onlays, performed with feldspathic ceramic (Vita Mark II, Vita Zanhfabrik, Bad Säckingen). Recalls were performed at 2 weeks (baseline = R1), 1 year (R2) and 2 years (R3) after the cementation by three calibrated blinded independent investigators using mirrors, magnifying eyeglasses, probes and bitewing radiographs. The postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, color match, surface roughness, tooth integrity, and restoration integrity were evaluated. The Friedman test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in time-to-time comparison of the parameters in the ceramics restorations. A total of 95.4% of the restorations were clinically acceptable at the 2-year recall, without a difference for any evaluation parameter for both ceramic materials. Based on the 2-year data, the CAD-CAM onlays manufactured with feldspathic and lithium-disilicate based ceramics showed similar clinical performance.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.19923107
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_19923107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_19923107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d917-19bd4a7e0377483cd0964fd7a253613a6176b4440b6f10434b9cf49456afd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kL1OwzAURr0woMIbMPgFHOz41q7ZUCCAFFSplIEpuoltYsn5UZKqKk9PEO30fdKRznAIuRM8UXwD961JfPieGhxdIoxJpeD6mjS5i3YacG5CTbGztAjLPbT0KUwhhhpnR7ddxNNEjwuhSFP25XCkeR9jf2SfwwP9GGKY2Xt_WPhucfRt-HGWZjF0iyDS_Rgw3pArj3Fyt-ddkV3-vM9eWbF9ecseC2aN0EyYygJqx6XWsJG15UaBtxrTtVRCohJaVQDAK-UFBwmVqT0YWCv0lssVgX-pxRnrMLtyGEOL46kUvPyrULamvFQoLxXkL9J7WLU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Feldspathic and Lithium Disilicate Onlays with a 2-Year Follow-Up: Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Saavedra, Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni ; Tribst, João Paulo Mendes ; Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho ; Melo, Renata Marques de ; Rodrigues, Vinícius Anéas ; Ramos, Gabriela Freitas ; Bottino, Marco Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Saavedra, Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni ; Tribst, João Paulo Mendes ; Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho ; Melo, Renata Marques de ; Rodrigues, Vinícius Anéas ; Ramos, Gabriela Freitas ; Bottino, Marco Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The present study was a prospective, controlled, randomized, clinical short-term trial aiming to evaluate the clinical performance of adhesively luted, lithium disilicate and feldspathic glass-ceramics onlays over a period up to 2 years. A total of 11 patients (7 female, 4 male; age range: 18-60 years, mean age: 39 years) were selected for this study. Each patient received a maximum of two restorations per group in a split-mouth-design. LD: Eleven onlays, performed with lithium disilicate-based ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), and FP: Eleven onlays, performed with feldspathic ceramic (Vita Mark II, Vita Zanhfabrik, Bad Säckingen). Recalls were performed at 2 weeks (baseline = R1), 1 year (R2) and 2 years (R3) after the cementation by three calibrated blinded independent investigators using mirrors, magnifying eyeglasses, probes and bitewing radiographs. The postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, color match, surface roughness, tooth integrity, and restoration integrity were evaluated. The Friedman test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in time-to-time comparison of the parameters in the ceramics restorations. A total of 95.4% of the restorations were clinically acceptable at the 2-year recall, without a difference for any evaluation parameter for both ceramic materials. Based on the 2-year data, the CAD-CAM onlays manufactured with feldspathic and lithium-disilicate based ceramics showed similar clinical performance.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19923107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>Dentistry not elsewhere classified ; FOS: Clinical medicine</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19923107$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saavedra, Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tribst, João Paulo Mendes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Renata Marques de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Vinícius Anéas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Gabriela Freitas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottino, Marco Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>Feldspathic and Lithium Disilicate Onlays with a 2-Year Follow-Up: Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial</title><description>Abstract The present study was a prospective, controlled, randomized, clinical short-term trial aiming to evaluate the clinical performance of adhesively luted, lithium disilicate and feldspathic glass-ceramics onlays over a period up to 2 years. A total of 11 patients (7 female, 4 male; age range: 18-60 years, mean age: 39 years) were selected for this study. Each patient received a maximum of two restorations per group in a split-mouth-design. LD: Eleven onlays, performed with lithium disilicate-based ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), and FP: Eleven onlays, performed with feldspathic ceramic (Vita Mark II, Vita Zanhfabrik, Bad Säckingen). Recalls were performed at 2 weeks (baseline = R1), 1 year (R2) and 2 years (R3) after the cementation by three calibrated blinded independent investigators using mirrors, magnifying eyeglasses, probes and bitewing radiographs. The postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, color match, surface roughness, tooth integrity, and restoration integrity were evaluated. The Friedman test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in time-to-time comparison of the parameters in the ceramics restorations. A total of 95.4% of the restorations were clinically acceptable at the 2-year recall, without a difference for any evaluation parameter for both ceramic materials. Based on the 2-year data, the CAD-CAM onlays manufactured with feldspathic and lithium-disilicate based ceramics showed similar clinical performance.</description><subject>Dentistry not elsewhere classified</subject><subject>FOS: Clinical medicine</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kL1OwzAURr0woMIbMPgFHOz41q7ZUCCAFFSplIEpuoltYsn5UZKqKk9PEO30fdKRznAIuRM8UXwD961JfPieGhxdIoxJpeD6mjS5i3YacG5CTbGztAjLPbT0KUwhhhpnR7ddxNNEjwuhSFP25XCkeR9jf2SfwwP9GGKY2Xt_WPhucfRt-HGWZjF0iyDS_Rgw3pArj3Fyt-ddkV3-vM9eWbF9ecseC2aN0EyYygJqx6XWsJG15UaBtxrTtVRCohJaVQDAK-UFBwmVqT0YWCv0lssVgX-pxRnrMLtyGEOL46kUvPyrULamvFQoLxXkL9J7WLU</recordid><startdate>20220530</startdate><enddate>20220530</enddate><creator>Saavedra, Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni</creator><creator>Tribst, João Paulo Mendes</creator><creator>Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho</creator><creator>Melo, Renata Marques de</creator><creator>Rodrigues, Vinícius Anéas</creator><creator>Ramos, Gabriela Freitas</creator><creator>Bottino, Marco Antonio</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220530</creationdate><title>Feldspathic and Lithium Disilicate Onlays with a 2-Year Follow-Up: Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial</title><author>Saavedra, Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni ; Tribst, João Paulo Mendes ; Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho ; Melo, Renata Marques de ; Rodrigues, Vinícius Anéas ; Ramos, Gabriela Freitas ; Bottino, Marco Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d917-19bd4a7e0377483cd0964fd7a253613a6176b4440b6f10434b9cf49456afd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Dentistry not elsewhere classified</topic><topic>FOS: Clinical medicine</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saavedra, Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tribst, João Paulo Mendes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Renata Marques de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Vinícius Anéas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Gabriela Freitas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottino, Marco Antonio</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saavedra, Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni</au><au>Tribst, João Paulo Mendes</au><au>Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho</au><au>Melo, Renata Marques de</au><au>Rodrigues, Vinícius Anéas</au><au>Ramos, Gabriela Freitas</au><au>Bottino, Marco Antonio</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Feldspathic and Lithium Disilicate Onlays with a 2-Year Follow-Up: Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial</title><date>2022-05-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>Abstract The present study was a prospective, controlled, randomized, clinical short-term trial aiming to evaluate the clinical performance of adhesively luted, lithium disilicate and feldspathic glass-ceramics onlays over a period up to 2 years. A total of 11 patients (7 female, 4 male; age range: 18-60 years, mean age: 39 years) were selected for this study. Each patient received a maximum of two restorations per group in a split-mouth-design. LD: Eleven onlays, performed with lithium disilicate-based ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), and FP: Eleven onlays, performed with feldspathic ceramic (Vita Mark II, Vita Zanhfabrik, Bad Säckingen). Recalls were performed at 2 weeks (baseline = R1), 1 year (R2) and 2 years (R3) after the cementation by three calibrated blinded independent investigators using mirrors, magnifying eyeglasses, probes and bitewing radiographs. The postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, color match, surface roughness, tooth integrity, and restoration integrity were evaluated. The Friedman test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in time-to-time comparison of the parameters in the ceramics restorations. A total of 95.4% of the restorations were clinically acceptable at the 2-year recall, without a difference for any evaluation parameter for both ceramic materials. Based on the 2-year data, the CAD-CAM onlays manufactured with feldspathic and lithium-disilicate based ceramics showed similar clinical performance.</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.19923107</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19923107
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_19923107
source DataCite
subjects Dentistry not elsewhere classified
FOS: Clinical medicine
title Feldspathic and Lithium Disilicate Onlays with a 2-Year Follow-Up: Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T07%3A38%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Saavedra,%20Guilherme%20de%20Siqueira%20Ferreira%20Anzaloni&rft.date=2022-05-30&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.19923107&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_19923107%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true