(a) The correlation between logand logs, (b) Complementary log log, i

(a) The correlation between logand logs, (b) Complementary log log, i

Copyright information:Taken from "Comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences of genus "BMC Microbiology 2004;4():20-20.Published online 5 May 2004PMCID:PMC415545.Copyright © 2004 Dighe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of thi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Abhijit S Dighe, Jangid, Kamlesh, González, José M, Vyankatesh J Pidiyar, Milind S Patole, Ranade, Dilip R, Shouche, Yogesh S
Format: Bild
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Uncategorized
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Abhijit S Dighe
Jangid, Kamlesh
González, José M
Vyankatesh J Pidiyar
Milind S Patole
Ranade, Dilip R
Shouche, Yogesh S
description Copyright information:Taken from "Comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences of genus "BMC Microbiology 2004;4():20-20.Published online 5 May 2004PMCID:PMC415545.Copyright © 2004 Dighe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.e., [ln(-ln) and ln(-ln)] plot for the same, and (c) Probability of for from 0.90 to 1.00. The line was determined by linear regression of the values. The extent of DNA hybridization was measured by the membrane filter method and the data used for DNA hybridization was as reported earlier [8, 21, 22]. The Distribution of was calculated from the equation ln(-ln) = 0.5077 [ln(-ln)] + 1.8999 and the SD of the residuals in , which was 0.3498.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.1970
format Image
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_1970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_1970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_19703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdjr0KwjAURrM4iLo73rGFGlMUNXOp-ADdw2172wbyU9KA-PYa0Bdw-DjwwYHD2L4U_CJu56OVfNDjMmEgXsqrWLM6wxyaiaDzIZDBqL2DluKTyIHxI7o-YSkga3OovJ0NWXIRwyv9aQXoLVsNaBbafblh4l431ePQY8ROR1Jz0PbjqFKoVKKsVL8SlUpOfyhvVbZEVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>image</recordtype></control><display><type>image</type><title>(a) The correlation between logand logs, (b) Complementary log log, i</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Abhijit S Dighe ; Jangid, Kamlesh ; González, José M ; Vyankatesh J Pidiyar ; Milind S Patole ; Ranade, Dilip R ; Shouche, Yogesh S</creator><creatorcontrib>Abhijit S Dighe ; Jangid, Kamlesh ; González, José M ; Vyankatesh J Pidiyar ; Milind S Patole ; Ranade, Dilip R ; Shouche, Yogesh S</creatorcontrib><description>Copyright information:Taken from "Comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences of genus "BMC Microbiology 2004;4():20-20.Published online 5 May 2004PMCID:PMC415545.Copyright © 2004 Dighe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.e., [ln(-ln) and ln(-ln)] plot for the same, and (c) Probability of for from 0.90 to 1.00. The line was determined by linear regression of the values. The extent of DNA hybridization was measured by the membrane filter method and the data used for DNA hybridization was as reported earlier [8, 21, 22]. The Distribution of was calculated from the equation ln(-ln) = 0.5077 [ln(-ln)] + 1.8999 and the SD of the residuals in , which was 0.3498.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>figshare</publisher><subject>Uncategorized</subject><creationdate>2011</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1892</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1970$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abhijit S Dighe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jangid, Kamlesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vyankatesh J Pidiyar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milind S Patole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranade, Dilip R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shouche, Yogesh S</creatorcontrib><title>(a) The correlation between logand logs, (b) Complementary log log, i</title><description>Copyright information:Taken from "Comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences of genus "BMC Microbiology 2004;4():20-20.Published online 5 May 2004PMCID:PMC415545.Copyright © 2004 Dighe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.e., [ln(-ln) and ln(-ln)] plot for the same, and (c) Probability of for from 0.90 to 1.00. The line was determined by linear regression of the values. The extent of DNA hybridization was measured by the membrane filter method and the data used for DNA hybridization was as reported earlier [8, 21, 22]. The Distribution of was calculated from the equation ln(-ln) = 0.5077 [ln(-ln)] + 1.8999 and the SD of the residuals in , which was 0.3498.</description><subject>Uncategorized</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>image</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>image</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNqdjr0KwjAURrM4iLo73rGFGlMUNXOp-ADdw2172wbyU9KA-PYa0Bdw-DjwwYHD2L4U_CJu56OVfNDjMmEgXsqrWLM6wxyaiaDzIZDBqL2DluKTyIHxI7o-YSkga3OovJ0NWXIRwyv9aQXoLVsNaBbafblh4l431ePQY8ROR1Jz0PbjqFKoVKKsVL8SlUpOfyhvVbZEVw</recordid><startdate>20111230</startdate><enddate>20111230</enddate><creator>Abhijit S Dighe</creator><creator>Jangid, Kamlesh</creator><creator>González, José M</creator><creator>Vyankatesh J Pidiyar</creator><creator>Milind S Patole</creator><creator>Ranade, Dilip R</creator><creator>Shouche, Yogesh S</creator><general>figshare</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111230</creationdate><title>(a) The correlation between logand logs, (b) Complementary log log, i</title><author>Abhijit S Dighe ; Jangid, Kamlesh ; González, José M ; Vyankatesh J Pidiyar ; Milind S Patole ; Ranade, Dilip R ; Shouche, Yogesh S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_19703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>images</rsrctype><prefilter>images</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Uncategorized</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abhijit S Dighe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jangid, Kamlesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vyankatesh J Pidiyar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milind S Patole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranade, Dilip R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shouche, Yogesh S</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abhijit S Dighe</au><au>Jangid, Kamlesh</au><au>González, José M</au><au>Vyankatesh J Pidiyar</au><au>Milind S Patole</au><au>Ranade, Dilip R</au><au>Shouche, Yogesh S</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><title>(a) The correlation between logand logs, (b) Complementary log log, i</title><date>2011-12-30</date><risdate>2011</risdate><abstract>Copyright information:Taken from "Comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences of genus "BMC Microbiology 2004;4():20-20.Published online 5 May 2004PMCID:PMC415545.Copyright © 2004 Dighe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.e., [ln(-ln) and ln(-ln)] plot for the same, and (c) Probability of for from 0.90 to 1.00. The line was determined by linear regression of the values. The extent of DNA hybridization was measured by the membrane filter method and the data used for DNA hybridization was as reported earlier [8, 21, 22]. The Distribution of was calculated from the equation ln(-ln) = 0.5077 [ln(-ln)] + 1.8999 and the SD of the residuals in , which was 0.3498.</abstract><pub>figshare</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.1970</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1970
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_1970
source DataCite
subjects Uncategorized
title (a) The correlation between logand logs, (b) Complementary log log, i
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T16%3A50%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Abhijit%20S%20Dighe&rft.date=2011-12-30&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.1970&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_1970%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true