Supplementary Material for: Outcomes of patients undergoing PCI of ostial coronary lesions- A single center study

Introduction Ostial coronary lesions are a subset of proximal coronary lesions which are relatively more difficult to treat and were associated with worse clinical outcomes in the early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era. Data regarding the outcomes of ostial lesions' PCI in the conte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: L., Zornitzki, A., Hochstadt, I., Loewenstein, J., Erez, A., Wenkert, Y., Moshkovits, E., Toledano, E., Chorin, J., Ben-Shoshan, A., Halkin, S., Bazan, Y., Arbel, A., Finkelstein, S., Banai, M., Konigstein
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator L., Zornitzki
A., Hochstadt
I., Loewenstein
J., Erez
A., Wenkert
Y., Moshkovits
E., Toledano
E., Chorin
J., Ben-Shoshan
A., Halkin
S., Bazan
Y., Arbel
A., Finkelstein
S., Banai
M., Konigstein
description Introduction Ostial coronary lesions are a subset of proximal coronary lesions which are relatively more difficult to treat and were associated with worse clinical outcomes in the early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era. Data regarding the outcomes of ostial lesions' PCI in the contemporary era is lacking. Methods We conducted a single center, all-comer, prospective registry study, enrolling patients undergoing PCI with the use of contemporary drug eluting stents (DES) between July 2016 and February 2018. Included in the present analysis were only patients treated for proximal lesions. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients undergoing PCI of ostial versus proximal non-ostial lesions. The primary endpoint was target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary endpoints included Target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) at 12 months. Results A total of 334 (84.7% male, 67.3±10.7 years) patients were included, of which 91 patients were treated for ostial lesions and 243 were treated for proximal non-ostial lesions. Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar between the two groups. At 12 months TVR and TLR were numerically higher among patients undergoing PCI of ostial versus non-ostial lesions without reaching statistical significance (5.5% vs. 3.3%; p=0.35 and 4.4% vs. 2.5%; p=0.47 respectively). The rate of MACE was similar between the two groups. Conclusion In patients undergoing PCI with the use of contemporary DES, clinical outcomes were similar among patients treated for ostial compared to proximal non-ostial lesions. Larger studies are required to further evaluate the performance of contemporary DES in this subset of lesions.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.19447580
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_19447580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_19447580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d910-5c72f0fc9820b782fdffec1fa09a3c19820a52268643c1f81cce5ccf9744e7973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kM1OwzAQhHPhgApvwMEvkGAnTmxzqyJ-KhUVid4t4-wGS0kcbOfQtycR9LTa3ZnR6MuyB0aLhkr-OKoCXR-_TYCCKc5FLelt9vO5zPMAI0zJhAt5NwmCMwNBH57IaUnWjxCJRzKb5FZRJMvUQei9m3ry0R62l49ps1gf_LSFDBCdn2JO9iSusgGIXZ0QSExLd7nLbtAMEe7_5y47vzyf27f8eHo9tPtj3ilG89qKEilaJUv6JWSJHSJYhoYqU1m2nU1dlo1s-LqiZNZCbS0qwTkIJapdxv9iO5OMdQn0HNy41tOM6g2IHpW-AtFXINUv0OZe-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Supplementary Material for: Outcomes of patients undergoing PCI of ostial coronary lesions- A single center study</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>L., Zornitzki ; A., Hochstadt ; I., Loewenstein ; J., Erez ; A., Wenkert ; Y., Moshkovits ; E., Toledano ; E., Chorin ; J., Ben-Shoshan ; A., Halkin ; S., Bazan ; Y., Arbel ; A., Finkelstein ; S., Banai ; M., Konigstein</creator><creatorcontrib>L., Zornitzki ; A., Hochstadt ; I., Loewenstein ; J., Erez ; A., Wenkert ; Y., Moshkovits ; E., Toledano ; E., Chorin ; J., Ben-Shoshan ; A., Halkin ; S., Bazan ; Y., Arbel ; A., Finkelstein ; S., Banai ; M., Konigstein</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Ostial coronary lesions are a subset of proximal coronary lesions which are relatively more difficult to treat and were associated with worse clinical outcomes in the early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era. Data regarding the outcomes of ostial lesions' PCI in the contemporary era is lacking. Methods We conducted a single center, all-comer, prospective registry study, enrolling patients undergoing PCI with the use of contemporary drug eluting stents (DES) between July 2016 and February 2018. Included in the present analysis were only patients treated for proximal lesions. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients undergoing PCI of ostial versus proximal non-ostial lesions. The primary endpoint was target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary endpoints included Target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) at 12 months. Results A total of 334 (84.7% male, 67.3±10.7 years) patients were included, of which 91 patients were treated for ostial lesions and 243 were treated for proximal non-ostial lesions. Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar between the two groups. At 12 months TVR and TLR were numerically higher among patients undergoing PCI of ostial versus non-ostial lesions without reaching statistical significance (5.5% vs. 3.3%; p=0.35 and 4.4% vs. 2.5%; p=0.47 respectively). The rate of MACE was similar between the two groups. Conclusion In patients undergoing PCI with the use of contemporary DES, clinical outcomes were similar among patients treated for ostial compared to proximal non-ostial lesions. Larger studies are required to further evaluate the performance of contemporary DES in this subset of lesions.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19447580</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Karger Publishers</publisher><subject>Medicine</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19447580$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>L., Zornitzki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A., Hochstadt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>I., Loewenstein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J., Erez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A., Wenkert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Y., Moshkovits</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>E., Toledano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>E., Chorin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J., Ben-Shoshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A., Halkin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S., Bazan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Y., Arbel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A., Finkelstein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S., Banai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M., Konigstein</creatorcontrib><title>Supplementary Material for: Outcomes of patients undergoing PCI of ostial coronary lesions- A single center study</title><description>Introduction Ostial coronary lesions are a subset of proximal coronary lesions which are relatively more difficult to treat and were associated with worse clinical outcomes in the early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era. Data regarding the outcomes of ostial lesions' PCI in the contemporary era is lacking. Methods We conducted a single center, all-comer, prospective registry study, enrolling patients undergoing PCI with the use of contemporary drug eluting stents (DES) between July 2016 and February 2018. Included in the present analysis were only patients treated for proximal lesions. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients undergoing PCI of ostial versus proximal non-ostial lesions. The primary endpoint was target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary endpoints included Target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) at 12 months. Results A total of 334 (84.7% male, 67.3±10.7 years) patients were included, of which 91 patients were treated for ostial lesions and 243 were treated for proximal non-ostial lesions. Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar between the two groups. At 12 months TVR and TLR were numerically higher among patients undergoing PCI of ostial versus non-ostial lesions without reaching statistical significance (5.5% vs. 3.3%; p=0.35 and 4.4% vs. 2.5%; p=0.47 respectively). The rate of MACE was similar between the two groups. Conclusion In patients undergoing PCI with the use of contemporary DES, clinical outcomes were similar among patients treated for ostial compared to proximal non-ostial lesions. Larger studies are required to further evaluate the performance of contemporary DES in this subset of lesions.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kM1OwzAQhHPhgApvwMEvkGAnTmxzqyJ-KhUVid4t4-wGS0kcbOfQtycR9LTa3ZnR6MuyB0aLhkr-OKoCXR-_TYCCKc5FLelt9vO5zPMAI0zJhAt5NwmCMwNBH57IaUnWjxCJRzKb5FZRJMvUQei9m3ry0R62l49ps1gf_LSFDBCdn2JO9iSusgGIXZ0QSExLd7nLbtAMEe7_5y47vzyf27f8eHo9tPtj3ilG89qKEilaJUv6JWSJHSJYhoYqU1m2nU1dlo1s-LqiZNZCbS0qwTkIJapdxv9iO5OMdQn0HNy41tOM6g2IHpW-AtFXINUv0OZe-w</recordid><startdate>20220329</startdate><enddate>20220329</enddate><creator>L., Zornitzki</creator><creator>A., Hochstadt</creator><creator>I., Loewenstein</creator><creator>J., Erez</creator><creator>A., Wenkert</creator><creator>Y., Moshkovits</creator><creator>E., Toledano</creator><creator>E., Chorin</creator><creator>J., Ben-Shoshan</creator><creator>A., Halkin</creator><creator>S., Bazan</creator><creator>Y., Arbel</creator><creator>A., Finkelstein</creator><creator>S., Banai</creator><creator>M., Konigstein</creator><general>Karger Publishers</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220329</creationdate><title>Supplementary Material for: Outcomes of patients undergoing PCI of ostial coronary lesions- A single center study</title><author>L., Zornitzki ; A., Hochstadt ; I., Loewenstein ; J., Erez ; A., Wenkert ; Y., Moshkovits ; E., Toledano ; E., Chorin ; J., Ben-Shoshan ; A., Halkin ; S., Bazan ; Y., Arbel ; A., Finkelstein ; S., Banai ; M., Konigstein</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d910-5c72f0fc9820b782fdffec1fa09a3c19820a52268643c1f81cce5ccf9744e7973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>L., Zornitzki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A., Hochstadt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>I., Loewenstein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J., Erez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A., Wenkert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Y., Moshkovits</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>E., Toledano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>E., Chorin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J., Ben-Shoshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A., Halkin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S., Bazan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Y., Arbel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A., Finkelstein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S., Banai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M., Konigstein</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>L., Zornitzki</au><au>A., Hochstadt</au><au>I., Loewenstein</au><au>J., Erez</au><au>A., Wenkert</au><au>Y., Moshkovits</au><au>E., Toledano</au><au>E., Chorin</au><au>J., Ben-Shoshan</au><au>A., Halkin</au><au>S., Bazan</au><au>Y., Arbel</au><au>A., Finkelstein</au><au>S., Banai</au><au>M., Konigstein</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Supplementary Material for: Outcomes of patients undergoing PCI of ostial coronary lesions- A single center study</title><date>2022-03-29</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>Introduction Ostial coronary lesions are a subset of proximal coronary lesions which are relatively more difficult to treat and were associated with worse clinical outcomes in the early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era. Data regarding the outcomes of ostial lesions' PCI in the contemporary era is lacking. Methods We conducted a single center, all-comer, prospective registry study, enrolling patients undergoing PCI with the use of contemporary drug eluting stents (DES) between July 2016 and February 2018. Included in the present analysis were only patients treated for proximal lesions. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients undergoing PCI of ostial versus proximal non-ostial lesions. The primary endpoint was target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary endpoints included Target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) at 12 months. Results A total of 334 (84.7% male, 67.3±10.7 years) patients were included, of which 91 patients were treated for ostial lesions and 243 were treated for proximal non-ostial lesions. Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar between the two groups. At 12 months TVR and TLR were numerically higher among patients undergoing PCI of ostial versus non-ostial lesions without reaching statistical significance (5.5% vs. 3.3%; p=0.35 and 4.4% vs. 2.5%; p=0.47 respectively). The rate of MACE was similar between the two groups. Conclusion In patients undergoing PCI with the use of contemporary DES, clinical outcomes were similar among patients treated for ostial compared to proximal non-ostial lesions. Larger studies are required to further evaluate the performance of contemporary DES in this subset of lesions.</abstract><pub>Karger Publishers</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.19447580</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19447580
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_19447580
source DataCite
subjects Medicine
title Supplementary Material for: Outcomes of patients undergoing PCI of ostial coronary lesions- A single center study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T19%3A40%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=L.,%20Zornitzki&rft.date=2022-03-29&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.19447580&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_19447580%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true