Overview and perspectives about the robotic surgical certification process in Brazil: the new statement and a national web-survey

ABSTRACT Objective: to appraise the general profile of the Brazilian robotic surgeon and the acknowledgment of the new certification process for robotic surgery upon the Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB - Brazilian Medical Association) statement. According to the AMB statement, medical societies an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: RAPHAEL L. C. ARAUJO, DYEGO SÁ BENEVENUTO, BRUNO ZILBERSTEIN, RUBENS A. SALLUM, SAMUEL AGUIAR-JR, LEANDRO TOTTI CAVAZZOLA, MIGUEL NACUL, ARMANDO G. F. MELANI, FLÁVIO D. S. TOMASICH
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator RAPHAEL L. C. ARAUJO
DYEGO SÁ BENEVENUTO
BRUNO ZILBERSTEIN
RUBENS A. SALLUM
SAMUEL AGUIAR-JR
LEANDRO TOTTI CAVAZZOLA
MIGUEL NACUL
ARMANDO G. F. MELANI
FLÁVIO D. S. TOMASICH
description ABSTRACT Objective: to appraise the general profile of the Brazilian robotic surgeon and the acknowledgment of the new certification process for robotic surgery upon the Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB - Brazilian Medical Association) statement. According to the AMB statement, medical societies and proctors have to achieve leading roles in training and certification of surgeons, acting in partnership with industry. Methods: a national web-based survey was promoted by the Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC - Brazilian College of Surgeons) among their members. Results: the 294 answers were split into two groups: 133 (45.3%) who had robotic console certification, and 161 (54.8%) who did not have it. The overall median age was 46, but the non-robotic group presented more surgeons with at least 30 years of experience than to the robotic group (32.3% versus 23.3%, p=0.033). Surgeons with robotic certification more frequently work in a city with at least one million inhabitants than surgeons who were not certified (85.7 versus 63.4%, p
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.14317044
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_14317044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_14317044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d914-8d8d9800e576d886eb02732989b7b552b84f35b1ba1b703e67ad1a08db928dc73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo10L1OwzAUhuEsDKhwBwy-gQQ7cWKbDSr-pEpdulvH9klrKX-y3VRl484JhU7nLN8zvFn2wGjRUMkfe1W0fh8PELBgvGKCcn6bfW9nDLPHE4HBkQlDnNAmP2MkYMZjIumAJIxmTN6SeAx7b6EjFkPy7fImPw5kCqPFGIkfyEuAL989XVbDgsYECXsc0oUHMlwWi3BCky_cjOe77KaFLuL9_11lu7fX3foj32zfP9fPm9wpxnPppFOSUqxF46Rs0NBSVKWSyghT16WRvK1qwwwwI2iFjQDHgEpnVCmdFdUq43-sgwTWJ9RT8D2Es2ZU_wbSvdLXQPoaqPoBIA1k9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Overview and perspectives about the robotic surgical certification process in Brazil: the new statement and a national web-survey</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>RAPHAEL L. C. ARAUJO ; DYEGO SÁ BENEVENUTO ; BRUNO ZILBERSTEIN ; RUBENS A. SALLUM ; SAMUEL AGUIAR-JR ; LEANDRO TOTTI CAVAZZOLA ; MIGUEL NACUL ; ARMANDO G. F. MELANI ; FLÁVIO D. S. TOMASICH</creator><creatorcontrib>RAPHAEL L. C. ARAUJO ; DYEGO SÁ BENEVENUTO ; BRUNO ZILBERSTEIN ; RUBENS A. SALLUM ; SAMUEL AGUIAR-JR ; LEANDRO TOTTI CAVAZZOLA ; MIGUEL NACUL ; ARMANDO G. F. MELANI ; FLÁVIO D. S. TOMASICH</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective: to appraise the general profile of the Brazilian robotic surgeon and the acknowledgment of the new certification process for robotic surgery upon the Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB - Brazilian Medical Association) statement. According to the AMB statement, medical societies and proctors have to achieve leading roles in training and certification of surgeons, acting in partnership with industry. Methods: a national web-based survey was promoted by the Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC - Brazilian College of Surgeons) among their members. Results: the 294 answers were split into two groups: 133 (45.3%) who had robotic console certification, and 161 (54.8%) who did not have it. The overall median age was 46, but the non-robotic group presented more surgeons with at least 30 years of experience than to the robotic group (32.3% versus 23.3%, p=0.033). Surgeons with robotic certification more frequently work in a city with at least one million inhabitants than surgeons who were not certified (85.7 versus 63.4%, p&lt;0.001). The majority of surgeons in both groups have similar positioning for all main points of the statement. However, the agreement proportions for the preceptors responsibility during the procedures were higher among non-robotic surgeons that expected the preceptor to assume co-responsibility for the procedure (85% versus 60.9%, p&lt;0.001), and intervene during the procedure as much as necessary (97.5% versus 91.7%, p=0.033). Conclusion: the overall agreement of the answers to the AMB statement seems to be a promising pathway to increase the participation of the medical entities into the robotic certification in Brazil.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14317044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>FOS: Clinical medicine ; Surgery</subject><creationdate>2021</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1892</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14317044$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>RAPHAEL L. C. ARAUJO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DYEGO SÁ BENEVENUTO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRUNO ZILBERSTEIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUBENS A. SALLUM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAMUEL AGUIAR-JR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEANDRO TOTTI CAVAZZOLA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIGUEL NACUL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMANDO G. F. MELANI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLÁVIO D. S. TOMASICH</creatorcontrib><title>Overview and perspectives about the robotic surgical certification process in Brazil: the new statement and a national web-survey</title><description>ABSTRACT Objective: to appraise the general profile of the Brazilian robotic surgeon and the acknowledgment of the new certification process for robotic surgery upon the Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB - Brazilian Medical Association) statement. According to the AMB statement, medical societies and proctors have to achieve leading roles in training and certification of surgeons, acting in partnership with industry. Methods: a national web-based survey was promoted by the Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC - Brazilian College of Surgeons) among their members. Results: the 294 answers were split into two groups: 133 (45.3%) who had robotic console certification, and 161 (54.8%) who did not have it. The overall median age was 46, but the non-robotic group presented more surgeons with at least 30 years of experience than to the robotic group (32.3% versus 23.3%, p=0.033). Surgeons with robotic certification more frequently work in a city with at least one million inhabitants than surgeons who were not certified (85.7 versus 63.4%, p&lt;0.001). The majority of surgeons in both groups have similar positioning for all main points of the statement. However, the agreement proportions for the preceptors responsibility during the procedures were higher among non-robotic surgeons that expected the preceptor to assume co-responsibility for the procedure (85% versus 60.9%, p&lt;0.001), and intervene during the procedure as much as necessary (97.5% versus 91.7%, p=0.033). Conclusion: the overall agreement of the answers to the AMB statement seems to be a promising pathway to increase the participation of the medical entities into the robotic certification in Brazil.</description><subject>FOS: Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo10L1OwzAUhuEsDKhwBwy-gQQ7cWKbDSr-pEpdulvH9klrKX-y3VRl484JhU7nLN8zvFn2wGjRUMkfe1W0fh8PELBgvGKCcn6bfW9nDLPHE4HBkQlDnNAmP2MkYMZjIumAJIxmTN6SeAx7b6EjFkPy7fImPw5kCqPFGIkfyEuAL989XVbDgsYECXsc0oUHMlwWi3BCky_cjOe77KaFLuL9_11lu7fX3foj32zfP9fPm9wpxnPppFOSUqxF46Rs0NBSVKWSyghT16WRvK1qwwwwI2iFjQDHgEpnVCmdFdUq43-sgwTWJ9RT8D2Es2ZU_wbSvdLXQPoaqPoBIA1k9A</recordid><startdate>20210326</startdate><enddate>20210326</enddate><creator>RAPHAEL L. C. ARAUJO</creator><creator>DYEGO SÁ BENEVENUTO</creator><creator>BRUNO ZILBERSTEIN</creator><creator>RUBENS A. SALLUM</creator><creator>SAMUEL AGUIAR-JR</creator><creator>LEANDRO TOTTI CAVAZZOLA</creator><creator>MIGUEL NACUL</creator><creator>ARMANDO G. F. MELANI</creator><creator>FLÁVIO D. S. TOMASICH</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210326</creationdate><title>Overview and perspectives about the robotic surgical certification process in Brazil: the new statement and a national web-survey</title><author>RAPHAEL L. C. ARAUJO ; DYEGO SÁ BENEVENUTO ; BRUNO ZILBERSTEIN ; RUBENS A. SALLUM ; SAMUEL AGUIAR-JR ; LEANDRO TOTTI CAVAZZOLA ; MIGUEL NACUL ; ARMANDO G. F. MELANI ; FLÁVIO D. S. TOMASICH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d914-8d8d9800e576d886eb02732989b7b552b84f35b1ba1b703e67ad1a08db928dc73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>FOS: Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RAPHAEL L. C. ARAUJO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DYEGO SÁ BENEVENUTO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRUNO ZILBERSTEIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUBENS A. SALLUM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAMUEL AGUIAR-JR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEANDRO TOTTI CAVAZZOLA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIGUEL NACUL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMANDO G. F. MELANI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLÁVIO D. S. TOMASICH</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RAPHAEL L. C. ARAUJO</au><au>DYEGO SÁ BENEVENUTO</au><au>BRUNO ZILBERSTEIN</au><au>RUBENS A. SALLUM</au><au>SAMUEL AGUIAR-JR</au><au>LEANDRO TOTTI CAVAZZOLA</au><au>MIGUEL NACUL</au><au>ARMANDO G. F. MELANI</au><au>FLÁVIO D. S. TOMASICH</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Overview and perspectives about the robotic surgical certification process in Brazil: the new statement and a national web-survey</title><date>2021-03-26</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective: to appraise the general profile of the Brazilian robotic surgeon and the acknowledgment of the new certification process for robotic surgery upon the Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB - Brazilian Medical Association) statement. According to the AMB statement, medical societies and proctors have to achieve leading roles in training and certification of surgeons, acting in partnership with industry. Methods: a national web-based survey was promoted by the Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC - Brazilian College of Surgeons) among their members. Results: the 294 answers were split into two groups: 133 (45.3%) who had robotic console certification, and 161 (54.8%) who did not have it. The overall median age was 46, but the non-robotic group presented more surgeons with at least 30 years of experience than to the robotic group (32.3% versus 23.3%, p=0.033). Surgeons with robotic certification more frequently work in a city with at least one million inhabitants than surgeons who were not certified (85.7 versus 63.4%, p&lt;0.001). The majority of surgeons in both groups have similar positioning for all main points of the statement. However, the agreement proportions for the preceptors responsibility during the procedures were higher among non-robotic surgeons that expected the preceptor to assume co-responsibility for the procedure (85% versus 60.9%, p&lt;0.001), and intervene during the procedure as much as necessary (97.5% versus 91.7%, p=0.033). Conclusion: the overall agreement of the answers to the AMB statement seems to be a promising pathway to increase the participation of the medical entities into the robotic certification in Brazil.</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.14317044</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14317044
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_14317044
source DataCite
subjects FOS: Clinical medicine
Surgery
title Overview and perspectives about the robotic surgical certification process in Brazil: the new statement and a national web-survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T02%3A39%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=RAPHAEL%20L.%20C.%20ARAUJO&rft.date=2021-03-26&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.14317044&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_14317044%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true