Bioethical conflicts in end of life care
Abstract This integrative review of the literature aims to identify the main conflicts between patients in palliative care, family and healthcare team from the point of view of the principialist ethics. A search was performed on databases, generating a final sample of 12 publications that, after bei...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Dataset |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Medeiros, Maria Olivia Sobral Fraga De Meira, Mariana Do Valle Fraga, Fernanda Moreira Ribeiro Carlito Lopes Nascimento Sobrinho Rosa, Darci De Oliveira Santa Rudval Souza Da Silva |
| description | Abstract This integrative review of the literature aims to identify the main conflicts between patients in palliative care, family and healthcare team from the point of view of the principialist ethics. A search was performed on databases, generating a final sample of 12 publications that, after being evaluated by the content analysis technique, enabled the emergence of three thematic categories: professional conduct – respect for the patient’s autonomy and the principle of beneficence; bioethical principles in the context of end of life care; and bioethical dilemmas in this context. We concluded that autonomy and beneficence stand out in the palliative care, ratifying the idea that the patient is the main actor and needs a humanized and comprehensive health care. In addition, we found some weaknesses in the process of education and communication in the healthcare team, patient and family relationship. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.6084/m9.figshare.12056940 |
| format | Dataset |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_12056940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_12056940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d910-c33994eb3fb2bd766c9e7676de01e283f6d125cc94af41e94bb31f2f8cd9a1a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1zztPwzAUhmEvDKjwDxg8dknwLU7OCFW5SJW6dLfs43NaS7mgJAv_niLo9E3vJz1CPGlVe9W55wFqLuflEmeqtVGNB6fuxfa1TLReCsZe4jRyX3BdZBkljVlOLPvCJPHaPIg7jv1Cj_-7Eae3_Wn3UR2O75-7l0OVQasKrQVwlCwnk3LrPQK1vvWZlCbTWfZZmwYRXGSnCVxKVrPhDjNEHRu7Ee7vNsc1YlkpfM1liPN30Cr8OsIA4eYIN4f9ARgHQ3U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Bioethical conflicts in end of life care</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Medeiros, Maria Olivia Sobral Fraga De ; Meira, Mariana Do Valle ; Fraga, Fernanda Moreira Ribeiro ; Carlito Lopes Nascimento Sobrinho ; Rosa, Darci De Oliveira Santa ; Rudval Souza Da Silva</creator><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Maria Olivia Sobral Fraga De ; Meira, Mariana Do Valle ; Fraga, Fernanda Moreira Ribeiro ; Carlito Lopes Nascimento Sobrinho ; Rosa, Darci De Oliveira Santa ; Rudval Souza Da Silva</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This integrative review of the literature aims to identify the main conflicts between patients in palliative care, family and healthcare team from the point of view of the principialist ethics. A search was performed on databases, generating a final sample of 12 publications that, after being evaluated by the content analysis technique, enabled the emergence of three thematic categories: professional conduct – respect for the patient’s autonomy and the principle of beneficence; bioethical principles in the context of end of life care; and bioethical dilemmas in this context. We concluded that autonomy and beneficence stand out in the palliative care, ratifying the idea that the patient is the main actor and needs a humanized and comprehensive health care. In addition, we found some weaknesses in the process of education and communication in the healthcare team, patient and family relationship.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12056940</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>FOS: Other medical sciences ; FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion ; Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified ; Philosophy</subject><creationdate>2020</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1894</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12056940$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Maria Olivia Sobral Fraga De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meira, Mariana Do Valle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraga, Fernanda Moreira Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlito Lopes Nascimento Sobrinho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Darci De Oliveira Santa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudval Souza Da Silva</creatorcontrib><title>Bioethical conflicts in end of life care</title><description>Abstract This integrative review of the literature aims to identify the main conflicts between patients in palliative care, family and healthcare team from the point of view of the principialist ethics. A search was performed on databases, generating a final sample of 12 publications that, after being evaluated by the content analysis technique, enabled the emergence of three thematic categories: professional conduct – respect for the patient’s autonomy and the principle of beneficence; bioethical principles in the context of end of life care; and bioethical dilemmas in this context. We concluded that autonomy and beneficence stand out in the palliative care, ratifying the idea that the patient is the main actor and needs a humanized and comprehensive health care. In addition, we found some weaknesses in the process of education and communication in the healthcare team, patient and family relationship.</description><subject>FOS: Other medical sciences</subject><subject>FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion</subject><subject>Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1zztPwzAUhmEvDKjwDxg8dknwLU7OCFW5SJW6dLfs43NaS7mgJAv_niLo9E3vJz1CPGlVe9W55wFqLuflEmeqtVGNB6fuxfa1TLReCsZe4jRyX3BdZBkljVlOLPvCJPHaPIg7jv1Cj_-7Eae3_Wn3UR2O75-7l0OVQasKrQVwlCwnk3LrPQK1vvWZlCbTWfZZmwYRXGSnCVxKVrPhDjNEHRu7Ee7vNsc1YlkpfM1liPN30Cr8OsIA4eYIN4f9ARgHQ3U</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Medeiros, Maria Olivia Sobral Fraga De</creator><creator>Meira, Mariana Do Valle</creator><creator>Fraga, Fernanda Moreira Ribeiro</creator><creator>Carlito Lopes Nascimento Sobrinho</creator><creator>Rosa, Darci De Oliveira Santa</creator><creator>Rudval Souza Da Silva</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Bioethical conflicts in end of life care</title><author>Medeiros, Maria Olivia Sobral Fraga De ; Meira, Mariana Do Valle ; Fraga, Fernanda Moreira Ribeiro ; Carlito Lopes Nascimento Sobrinho ; Rosa, Darci De Oliveira Santa ; Rudval Souza Da Silva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d910-c33994eb3fb2bd766c9e7676de01e283f6d125cc94af41e94bb31f2f8cd9a1a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>FOS: Other medical sciences</topic><topic>FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion</topic><topic>Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Maria Olivia Sobral Fraga De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meira, Mariana Do Valle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraga, Fernanda Moreira Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlito Lopes Nascimento Sobrinho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Darci De Oliveira Santa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudval Souza Da Silva</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Medeiros, Maria Olivia Sobral Fraga De</au><au>Meira, Mariana Do Valle</au><au>Fraga, Fernanda Moreira Ribeiro</au><au>Carlito Lopes Nascimento Sobrinho</au><au>Rosa, Darci De Oliveira Santa</au><au>Rudval Souza Da Silva</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Bioethical conflicts in end of life care</title><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><abstract>Abstract This integrative review of the literature aims to identify the main conflicts between patients in palliative care, family and healthcare team from the point of view of the principialist ethics. A search was performed on databases, generating a final sample of 12 publications that, after being evaluated by the content analysis technique, enabled the emergence of three thematic categories: professional conduct – respect for the patient’s autonomy and the principle of beneficence; bioethical principles in the context of end of life care; and bioethical dilemmas in this context. We concluded that autonomy and beneficence stand out in the palliative care, ratifying the idea that the patient is the main actor and needs a humanized and comprehensive health care. In addition, we found some weaknesses in the process of education and communication in the healthcare team, patient and family relationship.</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.12056940</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12056940 |
| ispartof | |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_12056940 |
| source | DataCite |
| subjects | FOS: Other medical sciences FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified Philosophy |
| title | Bioethical conflicts in end of life care |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A02%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Medeiros,%20Maria%20Olivia%20Sobral%20Fraga%20De&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.12056940&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_12056940%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |