Nurturing professionalism in medical schools. A systematic scoping review of training curricula between 1990–2019

Introduction: Professionalism is an evolving, socioculturally informed multidimensional construct that influences doctor-patient relationships, patient satisfaction and care outcomes. However, despite its clinical significance there is little consistency in how professionalism is nurtured amongst me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ong, Yun Ting, Kow, Cheryl Shumin, Teo, Yao Hao, Tan, Lorraine Hui En, Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad, Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng, Prakash, Kishore, Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen, Tan, Xiu Hui, Lim, Wei Qiang, Wu, Jiaxuan, Tan, Laura Hui Shuen, Tay, Kuang Teck, Chin, Annelissa, Toh, Ying Pin, Mason, Stephen, Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Ong, Yun Ting
Kow, Cheryl Shumin
Teo, Yao Hao
Tan, Lorraine Hui En
Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad
Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng
Prakash, Kishore
Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen
Tan, Xiu Hui
Lim, Wei Qiang
Wu, Jiaxuan
Tan, Laura Hui Shuen
Tay, Kuang Teck
Chin, Annelissa
Toh, Ying Pin
Mason, Stephen
Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha
description Introduction: Professionalism is an evolving, socioculturally informed multidimensional construct that influences doctor-patient relationships, patient satisfaction and care outcomes. However, despite its clinical significance there is little consistency in how professionalism is nurtured amongst medical students. To address this gap a systemic scoping review of nurturing professionalism in medical schools, is proposed. Methods: Levac’s framework and the PRISMA-P 2015 checklist underpinned a 6-stage systematic review protocol. Concurrent use of Braun and Clarke’s approach to thematic analysis and directed content analysis was used to identify the key elements in nurturing professionalism. Results: 13921 abstracts were identified from six databases, 854 full-text articles reviewed, and 162 full-text included articles were included. The 4 themes identified through thematic analysis are consistent with findings of the directed content analysis. These were the definition of professionalism, the approaches, content, barriers and enablers to teaching professionalism. Conclusion: Informed by a viable definition of professionalism and clear milestones nurturing professionalism nurturing professionalism begins with culturally appropriate training in clinical competence, humanistic qualities and reflective capacity. This process requires effective evaluations of professional identity formation, and the impact of the learning environment underlining the need for longitudinal assessments of the training process.
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.11861157
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_11861157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_11861157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d917-9ae4df7f371f809ed2e826e3ce789cdfa1c31880e3dbbad63a107092bf3da6ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kL1OwzAURr0woMIbMPgFEnzjkNhjVfEnVbB0j27s69ZSnES2Q9WNd-ANeRKooNMnHek7w2HsDkTZCFXfB106v08HjFQCqAbgob1m6W2JeYl-3PM5To5S8tOIg0-B-5EHst7gwJM5TNOQSr7m6ZQyBcze_NJpPh8jfXg68snxHNGPZ2SWGL1ZBuQ95SPRyEFr8f35VQnQN-zK4ZDo9n9XbPf0uNu8FNv359fNeltYDW2hkWrrWidbcEposhWpqiFpqFXaWIdgJCglSNq-R9tIBNEKXfVOWmzIyRWr_7QWMxqfqZujDxhPHYjunKQLursk6S5J5A9Qn2Dh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Nurturing professionalism in medical schools. A systematic scoping review of training curricula between 1990–2019</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Ong, Yun Ting ; Kow, Cheryl Shumin ; Teo, Yao Hao ; Tan, Lorraine Hui En ; Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad ; Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng ; Prakash, Kishore ; Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen ; Tan, Xiu Hui ; Lim, Wei Qiang ; Wu, Jiaxuan ; Tan, Laura Hui Shuen ; Tay, Kuang Teck ; Chin, Annelissa ; Toh, Ying Pin ; Mason, Stephen ; Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha</creator><creatorcontrib>Ong, Yun Ting ; Kow, Cheryl Shumin ; Teo, Yao Hao ; Tan, Lorraine Hui En ; Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad ; Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng ; Prakash, Kishore ; Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen ; Tan, Xiu Hui ; Lim, Wei Qiang ; Wu, Jiaxuan ; Tan, Laura Hui Shuen ; Tay, Kuang Teck ; Chin, Annelissa ; Toh, Ying Pin ; Mason, Stephen ; Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Professionalism is an evolving, socioculturally informed multidimensional construct that influences doctor-patient relationships, patient satisfaction and care outcomes. However, despite its clinical significance there is little consistency in how professionalism is nurtured amongst medical students. To address this gap a systemic scoping review of nurturing professionalism in medical schools, is proposed. Methods: Levac’s framework and the PRISMA-P 2015 checklist underpinned a 6-stage systematic review protocol. Concurrent use of Braun and Clarke’s approach to thematic analysis and directed content analysis was used to identify the key elements in nurturing professionalism. Results: 13921 abstracts were identified from six databases, 854 full-text articles reviewed, and 162 full-text included articles were included. The 4 themes identified through thematic analysis are consistent with findings of the directed content analysis. These were the definition of professionalism, the approaches, content, barriers and enablers to teaching professionalism. Conclusion: Informed by a viable definition of professionalism and clear milestones nurturing professionalism nurturing professionalism begins with culturally appropriate training in clinical competence, humanistic qualities and reflective capacity. This process requires effective evaluations of professional identity formation, and the impact of the learning environment underlining the need for longitudinal assessments of the training process.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.11861157</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Pharmacology ; Science Policy ; Space Science</subject><creationdate>2020</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1894</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11861157$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ong, Yun Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kow, Cheryl Shumin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teo, Yao Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Lorraine Hui En</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakash, Kishore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Xiu Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Wei Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jiaxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Laura Hui Shuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tay, Kuang Teck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin, Annelissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toh, Ying Pin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha</creatorcontrib><title>Nurturing professionalism in medical schools. A systematic scoping review of training curricula between 1990–2019</title><description>Introduction: Professionalism is an evolving, socioculturally informed multidimensional construct that influences doctor-patient relationships, patient satisfaction and care outcomes. However, despite its clinical significance there is little consistency in how professionalism is nurtured amongst medical students. To address this gap a systemic scoping review of nurturing professionalism in medical schools, is proposed. Methods: Levac’s framework and the PRISMA-P 2015 checklist underpinned a 6-stage systematic review protocol. Concurrent use of Braun and Clarke’s approach to thematic analysis and directed content analysis was used to identify the key elements in nurturing professionalism. Results: 13921 abstracts were identified from six databases, 854 full-text articles reviewed, and 162 full-text included articles were included. The 4 themes identified through thematic analysis are consistent with findings of the directed content analysis. These were the definition of professionalism, the approaches, content, barriers and enablers to teaching professionalism. Conclusion: Informed by a viable definition of professionalism and clear milestones nurturing professionalism nurturing professionalism begins with culturally appropriate training in clinical competence, humanistic qualities and reflective capacity. This process requires effective evaluations of professional identity formation, and the impact of the learning environment underlining the need for longitudinal assessments of the training process.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Space Science</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kL1OwzAURr0woMIbMPgFEnzjkNhjVfEnVbB0j27s69ZSnES2Q9WNd-ANeRKooNMnHek7w2HsDkTZCFXfB106v08HjFQCqAbgob1m6W2JeYl-3PM5To5S8tOIg0-B-5EHst7gwJM5TNOQSr7m6ZQyBcze_NJpPh8jfXg68snxHNGPZ2SWGL1ZBuQ95SPRyEFr8f35VQnQN-zK4ZDo9n9XbPf0uNu8FNv359fNeltYDW2hkWrrWidbcEposhWpqiFpqFXaWIdgJCglSNq-R9tIBNEKXfVOWmzIyRWr_7QWMxqfqZujDxhPHYjunKQLursk6S5J5A9Qn2Dh</recordid><startdate>20200217</startdate><enddate>20200217</enddate><creator>Ong, Yun Ting</creator><creator>Kow, Cheryl Shumin</creator><creator>Teo, Yao Hao</creator><creator>Tan, Lorraine Hui En</creator><creator>Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad</creator><creator>Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng</creator><creator>Prakash, Kishore</creator><creator>Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen</creator><creator>Tan, Xiu Hui</creator><creator>Lim, Wei Qiang</creator><creator>Wu, Jiaxuan</creator><creator>Tan, Laura Hui Shuen</creator><creator>Tay, Kuang Teck</creator><creator>Chin, Annelissa</creator><creator>Toh, Ying Pin</creator><creator>Mason, Stephen</creator><creator>Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200217</creationdate><title>Nurturing professionalism in medical schools. A systematic scoping review of training curricula between 1990–2019</title><author>Ong, Yun Ting ; Kow, Cheryl Shumin ; Teo, Yao Hao ; Tan, Lorraine Hui En ; Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad ; Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng ; Prakash, Kishore ; Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen ; Tan, Xiu Hui ; Lim, Wei Qiang ; Wu, Jiaxuan ; Tan, Laura Hui Shuen ; Tay, Kuang Teck ; Chin, Annelissa ; Toh, Ying Pin ; Mason, Stephen ; Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d917-9ae4df7f371f809ed2e826e3ce789cdfa1c31880e3dbbad63a107092bf3da6ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Space Science</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ong, Yun Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kow, Cheryl Shumin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teo, Yao Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Lorraine Hui En</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakash, Kishore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Xiu Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Wei Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jiaxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Laura Hui Shuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tay, Kuang Teck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin, Annelissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toh, Ying Pin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ong, Yun Ting</au><au>Kow, Cheryl Shumin</au><au>Teo, Yao Hao</au><au>Tan, Lorraine Hui En</au><au>Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad</au><au>Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng</au><au>Prakash, Kishore</au><au>Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen</au><au>Tan, Xiu Hui</au><au>Lim, Wei Qiang</au><au>Wu, Jiaxuan</au><au>Tan, Laura Hui Shuen</au><au>Tay, Kuang Teck</au><au>Chin, Annelissa</au><au>Toh, Ying Pin</au><au>Mason, Stephen</au><au>Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Nurturing professionalism in medical schools. A systematic scoping review of training curricula between 1990–2019</title><date>2020-02-17</date><risdate>2020</risdate><abstract>Introduction: Professionalism is an evolving, socioculturally informed multidimensional construct that influences doctor-patient relationships, patient satisfaction and care outcomes. However, despite its clinical significance there is little consistency in how professionalism is nurtured amongst medical students. To address this gap a systemic scoping review of nurturing professionalism in medical schools, is proposed. Methods: Levac’s framework and the PRISMA-P 2015 checklist underpinned a 6-stage systematic review protocol. Concurrent use of Braun and Clarke’s approach to thematic analysis and directed content analysis was used to identify the key elements in nurturing professionalism. Results: 13921 abstracts were identified from six databases, 854 full-text articles reviewed, and 162 full-text included articles were included. The 4 themes identified through thematic analysis are consistent with findings of the directed content analysis. These were the definition of professionalism, the approaches, content, barriers and enablers to teaching professionalism. Conclusion: Informed by a viable definition of professionalism and clear milestones nurturing professionalism nurturing professionalism begins with culturally appropriate training in clinical competence, humanistic qualities and reflective capacity. This process requires effective evaluations of professional identity formation, and the impact of the learning environment underlining the need for longitudinal assessments of the training process.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.11861157</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.11861157
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_11861157
source DataCite
subjects Medicine
Pharmacology
Science Policy
Space Science
title Nurturing professionalism in medical schools. A systematic scoping review of training curricula between 1990–2019
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A27%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Ong,%20Yun%20Ting&rft.date=2020-02-17&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.11861157&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_11861157%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true