Nurturing professionalism in medical schools. A systematic scoping review of training curricula between 1990–2019
Introduction: Professionalism is an evolving, socioculturally informed multidimensional construct that influences doctor-patient relationships, patient satisfaction and care outcomes. However, despite its clinical significance there is little consistency in how professionalism is nurtured amongst me...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Ong, Yun Ting Kow, Cheryl Shumin Teo, Yao Hao Tan, Lorraine Hui En Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng Prakash, Kishore Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen Tan, Xiu Hui Lim, Wei Qiang Wu, Jiaxuan Tan, Laura Hui Shuen Tay, Kuang Teck Chin, Annelissa Toh, Ying Pin Mason, Stephen Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha |
description | Introduction: Professionalism is an evolving, socioculturally informed multidimensional construct that influences doctor-patient relationships, patient satisfaction and care outcomes. However, despite its clinical significance there is little consistency in how professionalism is nurtured amongst medical students. To address this gap a systemic scoping review of nurturing professionalism in medical schools, is proposed. Methods: Levac’s framework and the PRISMA-P 2015 checklist underpinned a 6-stage systematic review protocol. Concurrent use of Braun and Clarke’s approach to thematic analysis and directed content analysis was used to identify the key elements in nurturing professionalism. Results: 13921 abstracts were identified from six databases, 854 full-text articles reviewed, and 162 full-text included articles were included. The 4 themes identified through thematic analysis are consistent with findings of the directed content analysis. These were the definition of professionalism, the approaches, content, barriers and enablers to teaching professionalism. Conclusion: Informed by a viable definition of professionalism and clear milestones nurturing professionalism nurturing professionalism begins with culturally appropriate training in clinical competence, humanistic qualities and reflective capacity. This process requires effective evaluations of professional identity formation, and the impact of the learning environment underlining the need for longitudinal assessments of the training process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.6084/m9.figshare.11861157 |
format | Dataset |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_11861157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_11861157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d917-9ae4df7f371f809ed2e826e3ce789cdfa1c31880e3dbbad63a107092bf3da6ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kL1OwzAURr0woMIbMPgFEnzjkNhjVfEnVbB0j27s69ZSnES2Q9WNd-ANeRKooNMnHek7w2HsDkTZCFXfB106v08HjFQCqAbgob1m6W2JeYl-3PM5To5S8tOIg0-B-5EHst7gwJM5TNOQSr7m6ZQyBcze_NJpPh8jfXg68snxHNGPZ2SWGL1ZBuQ95SPRyEFr8f35VQnQN-zK4ZDo9n9XbPf0uNu8FNv359fNeltYDW2hkWrrWidbcEposhWpqiFpqFXaWIdgJCglSNq-R9tIBNEKXfVOWmzIyRWr_7QWMxqfqZujDxhPHYjunKQLursk6S5J5A9Qn2Dh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Nurturing professionalism in medical schools. A systematic scoping review of training curricula between 1990–2019</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Ong, Yun Ting ; Kow, Cheryl Shumin ; Teo, Yao Hao ; Tan, Lorraine Hui En ; Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad ; Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng ; Prakash, Kishore ; Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen ; Tan, Xiu Hui ; Lim, Wei Qiang ; Wu, Jiaxuan ; Tan, Laura Hui Shuen ; Tay, Kuang Teck ; Chin, Annelissa ; Toh, Ying Pin ; Mason, Stephen ; Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha</creator><creatorcontrib>Ong, Yun Ting ; Kow, Cheryl Shumin ; Teo, Yao Hao ; Tan, Lorraine Hui En ; Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad ; Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng ; Prakash, Kishore ; Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen ; Tan, Xiu Hui ; Lim, Wei Qiang ; Wu, Jiaxuan ; Tan, Laura Hui Shuen ; Tay, Kuang Teck ; Chin, Annelissa ; Toh, Ying Pin ; Mason, Stephen ; Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Professionalism is an evolving, socioculturally informed multidimensional construct that influences doctor-patient relationships, patient satisfaction and care outcomes. However, despite its clinical significance there is little consistency in how professionalism is nurtured amongst medical students. To address this gap a systemic scoping review of nurturing professionalism in medical schools, is proposed. Methods: Levac’s framework and the PRISMA-P 2015 checklist underpinned a 6-stage systematic review protocol. Concurrent use of Braun and Clarke’s approach to thematic analysis and directed content analysis was used to identify the key elements in nurturing professionalism. Results: 13921 abstracts were identified from six databases, 854 full-text articles reviewed, and 162 full-text included articles were included. The 4 themes identified through thematic analysis are consistent with findings of the directed content analysis. These were the definition of professionalism, the approaches, content, barriers and enablers to teaching professionalism. Conclusion: Informed by a viable definition of professionalism and clear milestones nurturing professionalism nurturing professionalism begins with culturally appropriate training in clinical competence, humanistic qualities and reflective capacity. This process requires effective evaluations of professional identity formation, and the impact of the learning environment underlining the need for longitudinal assessments of the training process.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.11861157</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Pharmacology ; Science Policy ; Space Science</subject><creationdate>2020</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1894</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11861157$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ong, Yun Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kow, Cheryl Shumin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teo, Yao Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Lorraine Hui En</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakash, Kishore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Xiu Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Wei Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jiaxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Laura Hui Shuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tay, Kuang Teck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin, Annelissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toh, Ying Pin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha</creatorcontrib><title>Nurturing professionalism in medical schools. A systematic scoping review of training curricula between 1990–2019</title><description>Introduction: Professionalism is an evolving, socioculturally informed multidimensional construct that influences doctor-patient relationships, patient satisfaction and care outcomes. However, despite its clinical significance there is little consistency in how professionalism is nurtured amongst medical students. To address this gap a systemic scoping review of nurturing professionalism in medical schools, is proposed. Methods: Levac’s framework and the PRISMA-P 2015 checklist underpinned a 6-stage systematic review protocol. Concurrent use of Braun and Clarke’s approach to thematic analysis and directed content analysis was used to identify the key elements in nurturing professionalism. Results: 13921 abstracts were identified from six databases, 854 full-text articles reviewed, and 162 full-text included articles were included. The 4 themes identified through thematic analysis are consistent with findings of the directed content analysis. These were the definition of professionalism, the approaches, content, barriers and enablers to teaching professionalism. Conclusion: Informed by a viable definition of professionalism and clear milestones nurturing professionalism nurturing professionalism begins with culturally appropriate training in clinical competence, humanistic qualities and reflective capacity. This process requires effective evaluations of professional identity formation, and the impact of the learning environment underlining the need for longitudinal assessments of the training process.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Space Science</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kL1OwzAURr0woMIbMPgFEnzjkNhjVfEnVbB0j27s69ZSnES2Q9WNd-ANeRKooNMnHek7w2HsDkTZCFXfB106v08HjFQCqAbgob1m6W2JeYl-3PM5To5S8tOIg0-B-5EHst7gwJM5TNOQSr7m6ZQyBcze_NJpPh8jfXg68snxHNGPZ2SWGL1ZBuQ95SPRyEFr8f35VQnQN-zK4ZDo9n9XbPf0uNu8FNv359fNeltYDW2hkWrrWidbcEposhWpqiFpqFXaWIdgJCglSNq-R9tIBNEKXfVOWmzIyRWr_7QWMxqfqZujDxhPHYjunKQLursk6S5J5A9Qn2Dh</recordid><startdate>20200217</startdate><enddate>20200217</enddate><creator>Ong, Yun Ting</creator><creator>Kow, Cheryl Shumin</creator><creator>Teo, Yao Hao</creator><creator>Tan, Lorraine Hui En</creator><creator>Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad</creator><creator>Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng</creator><creator>Prakash, Kishore</creator><creator>Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen</creator><creator>Tan, Xiu Hui</creator><creator>Lim, Wei Qiang</creator><creator>Wu, Jiaxuan</creator><creator>Tan, Laura Hui Shuen</creator><creator>Tay, Kuang Teck</creator><creator>Chin, Annelissa</creator><creator>Toh, Ying Pin</creator><creator>Mason, Stephen</creator><creator>Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200217</creationdate><title>Nurturing professionalism in medical schools. A systematic scoping review of training curricula between 1990–2019</title><author>Ong, Yun Ting ; Kow, Cheryl Shumin ; Teo, Yao Hao ; Tan, Lorraine Hui En ; Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad ; Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng ; Prakash, Kishore ; Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen ; Tan, Xiu Hui ; Lim, Wei Qiang ; Wu, Jiaxuan ; Tan, Laura Hui Shuen ; Tay, Kuang Teck ; Chin, Annelissa ; Toh, Ying Pin ; Mason, Stephen ; Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d917-9ae4df7f371f809ed2e826e3ce789cdfa1c31880e3dbbad63a107092bf3da6ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Space Science</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ong, Yun Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kow, Cheryl Shumin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teo, Yao Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Lorraine Hui En</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakash, Kishore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Xiu Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Wei Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jiaxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Laura Hui Shuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tay, Kuang Teck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin, Annelissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toh, Ying Pin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ong, Yun Ting</au><au>Kow, Cheryl Shumin</au><au>Teo, Yao Hao</au><au>Tan, Lorraine Hui En</au><au>Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Ahmad</au><au>Quek, Nicholas Wei Sheng</au><au>Prakash, Kishore</au><au>Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen</au><au>Tan, Xiu Hui</au><au>Lim, Wei Qiang</au><au>Wu, Jiaxuan</au><au>Tan, Laura Hui Shuen</au><au>Tay, Kuang Teck</au><au>Chin, Annelissa</au><au>Toh, Ying Pin</au><au>Mason, Stephen</au><au>Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Nurturing professionalism in medical schools. A systematic scoping review of training curricula between 1990–2019</title><date>2020-02-17</date><risdate>2020</risdate><abstract>Introduction: Professionalism is an evolving, socioculturally informed multidimensional construct that influences doctor-patient relationships, patient satisfaction and care outcomes. However, despite its clinical significance there is little consistency in how professionalism is nurtured amongst medical students. To address this gap a systemic scoping review of nurturing professionalism in medical schools, is proposed. Methods: Levac’s framework and the PRISMA-P 2015 checklist underpinned a 6-stage systematic review protocol. Concurrent use of Braun and Clarke’s approach to thematic analysis and directed content analysis was used to identify the key elements in nurturing professionalism. Results: 13921 abstracts were identified from six databases, 854 full-text articles reviewed, and 162 full-text included articles were included. The 4 themes identified through thematic analysis are consistent with findings of the directed content analysis. These were the definition of professionalism, the approaches, content, barriers and enablers to teaching professionalism. Conclusion: Informed by a viable definition of professionalism and clear milestones nurturing professionalism nurturing professionalism begins with culturally appropriate training in clinical competence, humanistic qualities and reflective capacity. This process requires effective evaluations of professional identity formation, and the impact of the learning environment underlining the need for longitudinal assessments of the training process.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.11861157</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.11861157 |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_11861157 |
source | DataCite |
subjects | Medicine Pharmacology Science Policy Space Science |
title | Nurturing professionalism in medical schools. A systematic scoping review of training curricula between 1990–2019 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A27%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Ong,%20Yun%20Ting&rft.date=2020-02-17&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.11861157&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_11861157%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |