Gluteus Medius and Tensor Fascia Latae muscle activation levels during multi-joint strengthening exercises

Gluteus Medius and Tensor Fascia Latae muscle activation levels during multi-joint strengthening exercises

Abstract Aim: To compare the activation of GMed and TFL in four multi-joint exercises in strength training protocols and to verify if the level of muscle activation is indicated for strength gains in resistance training protocols. Methods: Eleven recreational lifters had normalized muscle activation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Frigotto, Michele Fernandes, Cardoso, Charles Alexandre, Santos, Rodrigo Rabello Dos, Rodrigues, Rodrigo
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
FOS: Health sciences
Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classified
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Frigotto, Michele Fernandes
Cardoso, Charles Alexandre
Santos, Rodrigo Rabello Dos
Rodrigues, Rodrigo
description Abstract Aim: To compare the activation of GMed and TFL in four multi-joint exercises in strength training protocols and to verify if the level of muscle activation is indicated for strength gains in resistance training protocols. Methods: Eleven recreational lifters had normalized muscle activation of GMed and TFL assessed during ten maximal repetitions of four multi-joint exercises: (1) bilateral supine bridge (BiBRG); (2) bilateral supine bridge with hip abducted (BiBRG-AB); (3) unilateral supine bridge (UniBRG) and (4) single-leg squat (SLS). Results: A load of exercises was significantly greater for the BiBRG and BiBRG-AB compared to the UniBRG and SLS (p
doi_str_mv 10.6084/m9.figshare.10073675
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_10073675</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_6084_m9_figshare_10073675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d915-f1dbf5147f20292eb1cd13494298757b74c32470528ed4c71fed3de2e3dded263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kL1OwzAURrMwoMIbMPgFEvyXOBlRRQtSEEt2y_G9SV0lDrKdCt6eVNDpDEf69Olk2ROjRUVr-Tw3xeDGeDIBC0apEpUq77PzcVoTrpF8ILgNxgPp0MclkIOJ1hnSmmSQzGu0ExJjk7uY5BZPJrzgFAmswflx81Ny-XlxPpGYAvoxndBfDX5jsC5ifMjuBjNFfPznLusOr93-LW8_j-_7lzaHhpX5wKAfSibVwClvOPbMAhOykbypVal6Ja3gUtGS1wjSKjYgCECOAgCBV2KXyb9Z2I5bl1B_BTeb8KMZ1dcSem70rYS-lRC_Bxtc0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Gluteus Medius and Tensor Fascia Latae muscle activation levels during multi-joint strengthening exercises</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Frigotto, Michele Fernandes ; Cardoso, Charles Alexandre ; Santos, Rodrigo Rabello Dos ; Rodrigues, Rodrigo</creator><creatorcontrib>Frigotto, Michele Fernandes ; Cardoso, Charles Alexandre ; Santos, Rodrigo Rabello Dos ; Rodrigues, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Aim: To compare the activation of GMed and TFL in four multi-joint exercises in strength training protocols and to verify if the level of muscle activation is indicated for strength gains in resistance training protocols. Methods: Eleven recreational lifters had normalized muscle activation of GMed and TFL assessed during ten maximal repetitions of four multi-joint exercises: (1) bilateral supine bridge (BiBRG); (2) bilateral supine bridge with hip abducted (BiBRG-AB); (3) unilateral supine bridge (UniBRG) and (4) single-leg squat (SLS). Results: A load of exercises was significantly greater for the BiBRG and BiBRG-AB compared to the UniBRG and SLS (p&lt;0.001). We observed that GMed activation was significant greater compared to TFL among the four exercises (p=0.004) [BiBRG: Δ=26.2%; BiBRG-AB: Δ=27.3%; UniBRG: Δ=24.5% and SLS: Δ=18.8%]. Additionally, GMed activation was classified as moderate (&lt;40%iMVC) and TFL activation was classified as low (&lt;20%iMVC) in all exercises. Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that GMed is more active than TFL in all analyzed exercises. However, the level of activation observed for GMed was below that recommended to strength gain in resistance training programs.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.10073675</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SciELO journals</publisher><subject>FOS: Health sciences ; Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classified</subject><creationdate>2019</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1887</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10073675$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frigotto, Michele Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Charles Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Rodrigo Rabello Dos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><title>Gluteus Medius and Tensor Fascia Latae muscle activation levels during multi-joint strengthening exercises</title><description>Abstract Aim: To compare the activation of GMed and TFL in four multi-joint exercises in strength training protocols and to verify if the level of muscle activation is indicated for strength gains in resistance training protocols. Methods: Eleven recreational lifters had normalized muscle activation of GMed and TFL assessed during ten maximal repetitions of four multi-joint exercises: (1) bilateral supine bridge (BiBRG); (2) bilateral supine bridge with hip abducted (BiBRG-AB); (3) unilateral supine bridge (UniBRG) and (4) single-leg squat (SLS). Results: A load of exercises was significantly greater for the BiBRG and BiBRG-AB compared to the UniBRG and SLS (p&lt;0.001). We observed that GMed activation was significant greater compared to TFL among the four exercises (p=0.004) [BiBRG: Δ=26.2%; BiBRG-AB: Δ=27.3%; UniBRG: Δ=24.5% and SLS: Δ=18.8%]. Additionally, GMed activation was classified as moderate (&lt;40%iMVC) and TFL activation was classified as low (&lt;20%iMVC) in all exercises. Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that GMed is more active than TFL in all analyzed exercises. However, the level of activation observed for GMed was below that recommended to strength gain in resistance training programs.</description><subject>FOS: Health sciences</subject><subject>Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classified</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kL1OwzAURrMwoMIbMPgFEvyXOBlRRQtSEEt2y_G9SV0lDrKdCt6eVNDpDEf69Olk2ROjRUVr-Tw3xeDGeDIBC0apEpUq77PzcVoTrpF8ILgNxgPp0MclkIOJ1hnSmmSQzGu0ExJjk7uY5BZPJrzgFAmswflx81Ny-XlxPpGYAvoxndBfDX5jsC5ifMjuBjNFfPznLusOr93-LW8_j-_7lzaHhpX5wKAfSibVwClvOPbMAhOykbypVal6Ja3gUtGS1wjSKjYgCECOAgCBV2KXyb9Z2I5bl1B_BTeb8KMZ1dcSem70rYS-lRC_Bxtc0Q</recordid><startdate>20191030</startdate><enddate>20191030</enddate><creator>Frigotto, Michele Fernandes</creator><creator>Cardoso, Charles Alexandre</creator><creator>Santos, Rodrigo Rabello Dos</creator><creator>Rodrigues, Rodrigo</creator><general>SciELO journals</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191030</creationdate><title>Gluteus Medius and Tensor Fascia Latae muscle activation levels during multi-joint strengthening exercises</title><author>Frigotto, Michele Fernandes ; Cardoso, Charles Alexandre ; Santos, Rodrigo Rabello Dos ; Rodrigues, Rodrigo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d915-f1dbf5147f20292eb1cd13494298757b74c32470528ed4c71fed3de2e3dded263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>FOS: Health sciences</topic><topic>Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classified</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frigotto, Michele Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Charles Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Rodrigo Rabello Dos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frigotto, Michele Fernandes</au><au>Cardoso, Charles Alexandre</au><au>Santos, Rodrigo Rabello Dos</au><au>Rodrigues, Rodrigo</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Gluteus Medius and Tensor Fascia Latae muscle activation levels during multi-joint strengthening exercises</title><date>2019-10-30</date><risdate>2019</risdate><abstract>Abstract Aim: To compare the activation of GMed and TFL in four multi-joint exercises in strength training protocols and to verify if the level of muscle activation is indicated for strength gains in resistance training protocols. Methods: Eleven recreational lifters had normalized muscle activation of GMed and TFL assessed during ten maximal repetitions of four multi-joint exercises: (1) bilateral supine bridge (BiBRG); (2) bilateral supine bridge with hip abducted (BiBRG-AB); (3) unilateral supine bridge (UniBRG) and (4) single-leg squat (SLS). Results: A load of exercises was significantly greater for the BiBRG and BiBRG-AB compared to the UniBRG and SLS (p&lt;0.001). We observed that GMed activation was significant greater compared to TFL among the four exercises (p=0.004) [BiBRG: Δ=26.2%; BiBRG-AB: Δ=27.3%; UniBRG: Δ=24.5% and SLS: Δ=18.8%]. Additionally, GMed activation was classified as moderate (&lt;40%iMVC) and TFL activation was classified as low (&lt;20%iMVC) in all exercises. Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that GMed is more active than TFL in all analyzed exercises. However, the level of activation observed for GMed was below that recommended to strength gain in resistance training programs.</abstract><pub>SciELO journals</pub><doi>10.6084/m9.figshare.10073675</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.10073675
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_6084_m9_figshare_10073675
source DataCite
subjects FOS: Health sciences
Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classified
title Gluteus Medius and Tensor Fascia Latae muscle activation levels during multi-joint strengthening exercises
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T11%3A20%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Frigotto,%20Michele%20Fernandes&rft.date=2019-10-30&rft_id=info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.10073675&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_6084_m9_figshare_10073675%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true