Figure 4 in The shape of water: adaptations of cochlea morphology in seals and oưers

Figure 4. Comparison of tympanic membrane, oval window, and round window areas of terrestrial and aquatic Caniformia. A, the areas of the tympanum, oval window, and round window (N = 33) correlate with body length in terrestrial (green dots, N = 19) and aquatic (blue dots, N = 14) taxa. B, when the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Taszus, Roxana, Rio, Joaquin del, Stoessel, Alexander, Nowotny, Manuela
Format: Bild
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Taszus, Roxana
Rio, Joaquin del
Stoessel, Alexander
Nowotny, Manuela
description Figure 4. Comparison of tympanic membrane, oval window, and round window areas of terrestrial and aquatic Caniformia. A, the areas of the tympanum, oval window, and round window (N = 33) correlate with body length in terrestrial (green dots, N = 19) and aquatic (blue dots, N = 14) taxa. B, when the membrane areas are size-corrected, only the oval window areas correlate (not strongly) negatively with head-bodylength. C, we also tested for the median difference plots are themselves a visual testing method as described in Ho et al.. When the unpaired median differences between aquatic and terrestrial Caniformia differ from zero, this points to a clear effect size between the two groups (Ho et al., 2019). This is found for the tympanal membrane area that is smaller in aquatic Caniformia and the round window area that is larger in aquatic Caniformia. The unpaired median differences for the round window area were not exactly 0, but they were very close, indicating that if there is an effect it is minimal.
doi_str_mv 10.5281/zenodo.8325716
format Image
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_5281_zenodo_8325716</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5281_zenodo_8325716</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_5281_zenodo_83257163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjkEKwjAQAHPxIOrV837A2lSrxatYfEA9h6XZNoG2W5KI1Ff5Ct-lxX7A08DAwAixlnGUJpncPqljzVG2S9KjPMzFLbf13RHswXZQGAJvsCfgCh4YyJ0ANfYBg-XOj7bk0jSE0LLrDTdcD2PoCRsP2Gng94ucX4pZ9TW0mrgQUX4pzteNxoClDaR6Z1t0g5KxGr_U70tNX7u_gw_crEh5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>image</recordtype></control><display><type>image</type><title>Figure 4 in The shape of water: adaptations of cochlea morphology in seals and oưers</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Taszus, Roxana ; Rio, Joaquin del ; Stoessel, Alexander ; Nowotny, Manuela</creator><creatorcontrib>Taszus, Roxana ; Rio, Joaquin del ; Stoessel, Alexander ; Nowotny, Manuela</creatorcontrib><description>Figure 4. Comparison of tympanic membrane, oval window, and round window areas of terrestrial and aquatic Caniformia. A, the areas of the tympanum, oval window, and round window (N = 33) correlate with body length in terrestrial (green dots, N = 19) and aquatic (blue dots, N = 14) taxa. B, when the membrane areas are size-corrected, only the oval window areas correlate (not strongly) negatively with head-bodylength. C, we also tested for the median difference plots are themselves a visual testing method as described in Ho et al.. When the unpaired median differences between aquatic and terrestrial Caniformia differ from zero, this points to a clear effect size between the two groups (Ho et al., 2019). This is found for the tympanal membrane area that is smaller in aquatic Caniformia and the round window area that is larger in aquatic Caniformia. The unpaired median differences for the round window area were not exactly 0, but they were very close, indicating that if there is an effect it is minimal.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8325716</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Zenodo</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Taxonomy</subject><creationdate>2023</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8325716$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taszus, Roxana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rio, Joaquin del</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoessel, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowotny, Manuela</creatorcontrib><title>Figure 4 in The shape of water: adaptations of cochlea morphology in seals and oưers</title><description>Figure 4. Comparison of tympanic membrane, oval window, and round window areas of terrestrial and aquatic Caniformia. A, the areas of the tympanum, oval window, and round window (N = 33) correlate with body length in terrestrial (green dots, N = 19) and aquatic (blue dots, N = 14) taxa. B, when the membrane areas are size-corrected, only the oval window areas correlate (not strongly) negatively with head-bodylength. C, we also tested for the median difference plots are themselves a visual testing method as described in Ho et al.. When the unpaired median differences between aquatic and terrestrial Caniformia differ from zero, this points to a clear effect size between the two groups (Ho et al., 2019). This is found for the tympanal membrane area that is smaller in aquatic Caniformia and the round window area that is larger in aquatic Caniformia. The unpaired median differences for the round window area were not exactly 0, but they were very close, indicating that if there is an effect it is minimal.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>image</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>image</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjkEKwjAQAHPxIOrV837A2lSrxatYfEA9h6XZNoG2W5KI1Ff5Ct-lxX7A08DAwAixlnGUJpncPqljzVG2S9KjPMzFLbf13RHswXZQGAJvsCfgCh4YyJ0ANfYBg-XOj7bk0jSE0LLrDTdcD2PoCRsP2Gng94ucX4pZ9TW0mrgQUX4pzteNxoClDaR6Z1t0g5KxGr_U70tNX7u_gw_crEh5</recordid><startdate>20230703</startdate><enddate>20230703</enddate><creator>Taszus, Roxana</creator><creator>Rio, Joaquin del</creator><creator>Stoessel, Alexander</creator><creator>Nowotny, Manuela</creator><general>Zenodo</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230703</creationdate><title>Figure 4 in The shape of water: adaptations of cochlea morphology in seals and oưers</title><author>Taszus, Roxana ; Rio, Joaquin del ; Stoessel, Alexander ; Nowotny, Manuela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_5281_zenodo_83257163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>images</rsrctype><prefilter>images</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taszus, Roxana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rio, Joaquin del</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoessel, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowotny, Manuela</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taszus, Roxana</au><au>Rio, Joaquin del</au><au>Stoessel, Alexander</au><au>Nowotny, Manuela</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><title>Figure 4 in The shape of water: adaptations of cochlea morphology in seals and oưers</title><date>2023-07-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><abstract>Figure 4. Comparison of tympanic membrane, oval window, and round window areas of terrestrial and aquatic Caniformia. A, the areas of the tympanum, oval window, and round window (N = 33) correlate with body length in terrestrial (green dots, N = 19) and aquatic (blue dots, N = 14) taxa. B, when the membrane areas are size-corrected, only the oval window areas correlate (not strongly) negatively with head-bodylength. C, we also tested for the median difference plots are themselves a visual testing method as described in Ho et al.. When the unpaired median differences between aquatic and terrestrial Caniformia differ from zero, this points to a clear effect size between the two groups (Ho et al., 2019). This is found for the tympanal membrane area that is smaller in aquatic Caniformia and the round window area that is larger in aquatic Caniformia. The unpaired median differences for the round window area were not exactly 0, but they were very close, indicating that if there is an effect it is minimal.</abstract><pub>Zenodo</pub><doi>10.5281/zenodo.8325716</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8325716
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_5281_zenodo_8325716
source DataCite
subjects Biodiversity
Taxonomy
title Figure 4 in The shape of water: adaptations of cochlea morphology in seals and oưers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T07%3A33%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Taszus,%20Roxana&rft.date=2023-07-03&rft_id=info:doi/10.5281/zenodo.8325716&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_5281_zenodo_8325716%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true