EJPSOIL-SoilX: Final Project Report

With climate change, both drought and heavy precipitation are becoming more frequent. The project SoilX investigated the possibilities to mitigate impacts of such extremes on crop productivity through improved soil management practices. To do that, we applied a multi- and transdisciplinary research...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Holzkämper, Annelie, ten Damme, Loraine, D'Hose, Tommy, Medhi-Schulz, Bano, Pullens, Johannes, Leonhard, Heidi, Höckert, Jenny, Lundström, Christina, Meurer, Katharina
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Holzkämper, Annelie
ten Damme, Loraine
D'Hose, Tommy
Medhi-Schulz, Bano
Pullens, Johannes
Leonhard, Heidi
Höckert, Jenny
Lundström, Christina
Meurer, Katharina
description With climate change, both drought and heavy precipitation are becoming more frequent. The project SoilX investigated the possibilities to mitigate impacts of such extremes on crop productivity through improved soil management practices. To do that, we applied a multi- and transdisciplinary research framework, where three methodological approaches were applied to derive complementary findings on the possibilities to alleviate impacts of increasingly frequent precipitation extremes on cropping systems in Europe through adaptations in soil and crop management: (1) sampling and measurement campaigns in long-term field experiments (LTE’s) along a north-south gradient through Europe, (2) simulation experiments with an ensemble of four agro-hydrological models and the development of a new model for dynamically simulating soil structural changes, and finally (3) socio-economic interviews within regional farming communities. During the harmonized field sampling campaign, contrasting treatments of organic inputs and tillage reduction were sampled in the selected LTE’s, both in topsoil and subsoil. A set of soil physical, mechanical and hydraulic properties were determined in lab analyses. The resulting dataset provides a valuable evidence base documenting soil structural differences in response to differences in management and pedo-climatic conditions within Europe. An R-Tool (SoilManageR) developed within the project allows for synthesizing management information into continuous management indicators, which can serve as predictor variables in advanced statistical analyses of measurement data such as collected within this project. Alongside these efforts, four agro-hydrological models (i.e. APEX, CANDY, DAISY, SWAP) were calibrated for a subset of LTE’s that represented a north-south climatic gradient and that had adequate amounts of reference data available. The calibrated models were applied to transient downscaled climate projections for the period 2021-2090 to evaluate the hypothetical adaptation benefits of soil structural improvements and to compare those potential benefits to the benefits that are achievable according to measured differences in soil hydraulic properties between contrasting treatments. These multi-model simulation experiments were complemented with the development of a new model (USSF) that allows for simulating the evolution of soil structural properties (which are assumed to be static in common agro-hydrological models) in response to climat
doi_str_mv 10.5281/zenodo.14001119
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_5281_zenodo_14001119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5281_zenodo_14001119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_5281_zenodo_140011193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBA3NNAzNbIw1K9KzctPydczNDEwMDQ0tORkUHb1Cgj29_TRDc7PzImwUnDLzEvMUQgoys9KTS5RCEotyC8q4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDPpuriHOHropiSWJyZklqfEFRZm5iUWV8YYG8SBr4iHWxMOsMSZdBwAfXTVI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>EJPSOIL-SoilX: Final Project Report</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Holzkämper, Annelie ; ten Damme, Loraine ; D'Hose, Tommy ; Medhi-Schulz, Bano ; Pullens, Johannes ; Leonhard, Heidi ; Höckert, Jenny ; Lundström, Christina ; Meurer, Katharina</creator><creatorcontrib>Holzkämper, Annelie ; ten Damme, Loraine ; D'Hose, Tommy ; Medhi-Schulz, Bano ; Pullens, Johannes ; Leonhard, Heidi ; Höckert, Jenny ; Lundström, Christina ; Meurer, Katharina</creatorcontrib><description>With climate change, both drought and heavy precipitation are becoming more frequent. The project SoilX investigated the possibilities to mitigate impacts of such extremes on crop productivity through improved soil management practices. To do that, we applied a multi- and transdisciplinary research framework, where three methodological approaches were applied to derive complementary findings on the possibilities to alleviate impacts of increasingly frequent precipitation extremes on cropping systems in Europe through adaptations in soil and crop management: (1) sampling and measurement campaigns in long-term field experiments (LTE’s) along a north-south gradient through Europe, (2) simulation experiments with an ensemble of four agro-hydrological models and the development of a new model for dynamically simulating soil structural changes, and finally (3) socio-economic interviews within regional farming communities. During the harmonized field sampling campaign, contrasting treatments of organic inputs and tillage reduction were sampled in the selected LTE’s, both in topsoil and subsoil. A set of soil physical, mechanical and hydraulic properties were determined in lab analyses. The resulting dataset provides a valuable evidence base documenting soil structural differences in response to differences in management and pedo-climatic conditions within Europe. An R-Tool (SoilManageR) developed within the project allows for synthesizing management information into continuous management indicators, which can serve as predictor variables in advanced statistical analyses of measurement data such as collected within this project. Alongside these efforts, four agro-hydrological models (i.e. APEX, CANDY, DAISY, SWAP) were calibrated for a subset of LTE’s that represented a north-south climatic gradient and that had adequate amounts of reference data available. The calibrated models were applied to transient downscaled climate projections for the period 2021-2090 to evaluate the hypothetical adaptation benefits of soil structural improvements and to compare those potential benefits to the benefits that are achievable according to measured differences in soil hydraulic properties between contrasting treatments. These multi-model simulation experiments were complemented with the development of a new model (USSF) that allows for simulating the evolution of soil structural properties (which are assumed to be static in common agro-hydrological models) in response to climate and management drivers. Beyond these biophysical investigation, socio-economic interview studies were conducted in regions centred around the selected LTE sites. These interview studies aimed at understanding farmers’ reasoning for the (non-)use of specific soil management strategies. Based on the improved understanding of farmers’ decision making, recommendations could be derived to support policy makers and extension services in their design of measures and programmes to improve the uptake of soil management improvements in practice. From the compiled results of this project, we conclude that while soil structural improvements have potential to buffer the effects of short-term droughts on crop productivity according to hypothetical simulation experiments, the adaptation benefits realized in the contrasting treatments of LTE’s investigated in this project are likely to be small under current and future climatic conditions as measured differences in physical, mechanical and hydraulic properties were mostly small and insignificant. This can be explained by the fact that treatments implemented in current LTE’s are often conservative (i.e. relatively small differences between contrasting treatments; often only single and not combined measures are tested) and were, of course, not targeted at promoting soil structural improvements. This finding calls for the introduction of new LTE treatments with greater emphasis on soil health and climate resilience. The need for more efficient management strategies to maintain and improve these soil functionalities is clearly highlighted by the results from model-based studies of climate change impacts in SoilX: climate warming contributed to the degradation of soil organic carbon resources, potentially also leading to a deterioration of the soils’ ability to infiltrate water and to retain water in the crop root zone. Based on analyses of farmer interviews across different LTE regions in Europe, we can say that, since viewpoints and priorities in the selection of soil management choices differ, divers strategies to promote the uptake of soil management improvements are likely to be most successful: farmers with a strong intrinsic motivation to maintain and improve soil functionalities are most likely to respond positively to educational measures and can best be supported by regulatory frameworks supporting flexibility in the choice of measures. Farmers with a stronger focus on economic and production targets, however, may better be addressed by information campaigns highlighting possibilities for reducing production cost and increasing yield benefits in combination with regulatory frameworks that buffer against economic risks and possible additional costs.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14001119</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Zenodo</publisher><subject>Agricultural sciences ; FOS: Agricultural sciences ; Soil sciences</subject><creationdate>2024</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-1951-1041 ; 0000-0003-2129-1989 ; 0000-0003-0253-3663 ; 0000-0002-8705-5666 ; 0000-0002-1377-2339 ; 0000-0003-1085-3683 ; 0000-0002-8880-9650 ; 0000-0002-6852-1019 ; 0000-0003-4581-6444</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888,4476</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14001119$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holzkämper, Annelie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Damme, Loraine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Hose, Tommy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medhi-Schulz, Bano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pullens, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonhard, Heidi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höckert, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundström, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meurer, Katharina</creatorcontrib><title>EJPSOIL-SoilX: Final Project Report</title><description>With climate change, both drought and heavy precipitation are becoming more frequent. The project SoilX investigated the possibilities to mitigate impacts of such extremes on crop productivity through improved soil management practices. To do that, we applied a multi- and transdisciplinary research framework, where three methodological approaches were applied to derive complementary findings on the possibilities to alleviate impacts of increasingly frequent precipitation extremes on cropping systems in Europe through adaptations in soil and crop management: (1) sampling and measurement campaigns in long-term field experiments (LTE’s) along a north-south gradient through Europe, (2) simulation experiments with an ensemble of four agro-hydrological models and the development of a new model for dynamically simulating soil structural changes, and finally (3) socio-economic interviews within regional farming communities. During the harmonized field sampling campaign, contrasting treatments of organic inputs and tillage reduction were sampled in the selected LTE’s, both in topsoil and subsoil. A set of soil physical, mechanical and hydraulic properties were determined in lab analyses. The resulting dataset provides a valuable evidence base documenting soil structural differences in response to differences in management and pedo-climatic conditions within Europe. An R-Tool (SoilManageR) developed within the project allows for synthesizing management information into continuous management indicators, which can serve as predictor variables in advanced statistical analyses of measurement data such as collected within this project. Alongside these efforts, four agro-hydrological models (i.e. APEX, CANDY, DAISY, SWAP) were calibrated for a subset of LTE’s that represented a north-south climatic gradient and that had adequate amounts of reference data available. The calibrated models were applied to transient downscaled climate projections for the period 2021-2090 to evaluate the hypothetical adaptation benefits of soil structural improvements and to compare those potential benefits to the benefits that are achievable according to measured differences in soil hydraulic properties between contrasting treatments. These multi-model simulation experiments were complemented with the development of a new model (USSF) that allows for simulating the evolution of soil structural properties (which are assumed to be static in common agro-hydrological models) in response to climate and management drivers. Beyond these biophysical investigation, socio-economic interview studies were conducted in regions centred around the selected LTE sites. These interview studies aimed at understanding farmers’ reasoning for the (non-)use of specific soil management strategies. Based on the improved understanding of farmers’ decision making, recommendations could be derived to support policy makers and extension services in their design of measures and programmes to improve the uptake of soil management improvements in practice. From the compiled results of this project, we conclude that while soil structural improvements have potential to buffer the effects of short-term droughts on crop productivity according to hypothetical simulation experiments, the adaptation benefits realized in the contrasting treatments of LTE’s investigated in this project are likely to be small under current and future climatic conditions as measured differences in physical, mechanical and hydraulic properties were mostly small and insignificant. This can be explained by the fact that treatments implemented in current LTE’s are often conservative (i.e. relatively small differences between contrasting treatments; often only single and not combined measures are tested) and were, of course, not targeted at promoting soil structural improvements. This finding calls for the introduction of new LTE treatments with greater emphasis on soil health and climate resilience. The need for more efficient management strategies to maintain and improve these soil functionalities is clearly highlighted by the results from model-based studies of climate change impacts in SoilX: climate warming contributed to the degradation of soil organic carbon resources, potentially also leading to a deterioration of the soils’ ability to infiltrate water and to retain water in the crop root zone. Based on analyses of farmer interviews across different LTE regions in Europe, we can say that, since viewpoints and priorities in the selection of soil management choices differ, divers strategies to promote the uptake of soil management improvements are likely to be most successful: farmers with a strong intrinsic motivation to maintain and improve soil functionalities are most likely to respond positively to educational measures and can best be supported by regulatory frameworks supporting flexibility in the choice of measures. Farmers with a stronger focus on economic and production targets, however, may better be addressed by information campaigns highlighting possibilities for reducing production cost and increasing yield benefits in combination with regulatory frameworks that buffer against economic risks and possible additional costs.</description><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>FOS: Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYBA3NNAzNbIw1K9KzctPydczNDEwMDQ0tORkUHb1Cgj29_TRDc7PzImwUnDLzEvMUQgoys9KTS5RCEotyC8q4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDPpuriHOHropiSWJyZklqfEFRZm5iUWV8YYG8SBr4iHWxMOsMSZdBwAfXTVI</recordid><startdate>20241028</startdate><enddate>20241028</enddate><creator>Holzkämper, Annelie</creator><creator>ten Damme, Loraine</creator><creator>D'Hose, Tommy</creator><creator>Medhi-Schulz, Bano</creator><creator>Pullens, Johannes</creator><creator>Leonhard, Heidi</creator><creator>Höckert, Jenny</creator><creator>Lundström, Christina</creator><creator>Meurer, Katharina</creator><general>Zenodo</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1951-1041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2129-1989</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0253-3663</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8705-5666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1377-2339</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1085-3683</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8880-9650</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6852-1019</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4581-6444</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241028</creationdate><title>EJPSOIL-SoilX: Final Project Report</title><author>Holzkämper, Annelie ; ten Damme, Loraine ; D'Hose, Tommy ; Medhi-Schulz, Bano ; Pullens, Johannes ; Leonhard, Heidi ; Höckert, Jenny ; Lundström, Christina ; Meurer, Katharina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_5281_zenodo_140011193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>FOS: Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holzkämper, Annelie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Damme, Loraine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Hose, Tommy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medhi-Schulz, Bano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pullens, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonhard, Heidi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höckert, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundström, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meurer, Katharina</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holzkämper, Annelie</au><au>ten Damme, Loraine</au><au>D'Hose, Tommy</au><au>Medhi-Schulz, Bano</au><au>Pullens, Johannes</au><au>Leonhard, Heidi</au><au>Höckert, Jenny</au><au>Lundström, Christina</au><au>Meurer, Katharina</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>EJPSOIL-SoilX: Final Project Report</btitle><date>2024-10-28</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>With climate change, both drought and heavy precipitation are becoming more frequent. The project SoilX investigated the possibilities to mitigate impacts of such extremes on crop productivity through improved soil management practices. To do that, we applied a multi- and transdisciplinary research framework, where three methodological approaches were applied to derive complementary findings on the possibilities to alleviate impacts of increasingly frequent precipitation extremes on cropping systems in Europe through adaptations in soil and crop management: (1) sampling and measurement campaigns in long-term field experiments (LTE’s) along a north-south gradient through Europe, (2) simulation experiments with an ensemble of four agro-hydrological models and the development of a new model for dynamically simulating soil structural changes, and finally (3) socio-economic interviews within regional farming communities. During the harmonized field sampling campaign, contrasting treatments of organic inputs and tillage reduction were sampled in the selected LTE’s, both in topsoil and subsoil. A set of soil physical, mechanical and hydraulic properties were determined in lab analyses. The resulting dataset provides a valuable evidence base documenting soil structural differences in response to differences in management and pedo-climatic conditions within Europe. An R-Tool (SoilManageR) developed within the project allows for synthesizing management information into continuous management indicators, which can serve as predictor variables in advanced statistical analyses of measurement data such as collected within this project. Alongside these efforts, four agro-hydrological models (i.e. APEX, CANDY, DAISY, SWAP) were calibrated for a subset of LTE’s that represented a north-south climatic gradient and that had adequate amounts of reference data available. The calibrated models were applied to transient downscaled climate projections for the period 2021-2090 to evaluate the hypothetical adaptation benefits of soil structural improvements and to compare those potential benefits to the benefits that are achievable according to measured differences in soil hydraulic properties between contrasting treatments. These multi-model simulation experiments were complemented with the development of a new model (USSF) that allows for simulating the evolution of soil structural properties (which are assumed to be static in common agro-hydrological models) in response to climate and management drivers. Beyond these biophysical investigation, socio-economic interview studies were conducted in regions centred around the selected LTE sites. These interview studies aimed at understanding farmers’ reasoning for the (non-)use of specific soil management strategies. Based on the improved understanding of farmers’ decision making, recommendations could be derived to support policy makers and extension services in their design of measures and programmes to improve the uptake of soil management improvements in practice. From the compiled results of this project, we conclude that while soil structural improvements have potential to buffer the effects of short-term droughts on crop productivity according to hypothetical simulation experiments, the adaptation benefits realized in the contrasting treatments of LTE’s investigated in this project are likely to be small under current and future climatic conditions as measured differences in physical, mechanical and hydraulic properties were mostly small and insignificant. This can be explained by the fact that treatments implemented in current LTE’s are often conservative (i.e. relatively small differences between contrasting treatments; often only single and not combined measures are tested) and were, of course, not targeted at promoting soil structural improvements. This finding calls for the introduction of new LTE treatments with greater emphasis on soil health and climate resilience. The need for more efficient management strategies to maintain and improve these soil functionalities is clearly highlighted by the results from model-based studies of climate change impacts in SoilX: climate warming contributed to the degradation of soil organic carbon resources, potentially also leading to a deterioration of the soils’ ability to infiltrate water and to retain water in the crop root zone. Based on analyses of farmer interviews across different LTE regions in Europe, we can say that, since viewpoints and priorities in the selection of soil management choices differ, divers strategies to promote the uptake of soil management improvements are likely to be most successful: farmers with a strong intrinsic motivation to maintain and improve soil functionalities are most likely to respond positively to educational measures and can best be supported by regulatory frameworks supporting flexibility in the choice of measures. Farmers with a stronger focus on economic and production targets, however, may better be addressed by information campaigns highlighting possibilities for reducing production cost and increasing yield benefits in combination with regulatory frameworks that buffer against economic risks and possible additional costs.</abstract><pub>Zenodo</pub><doi>10.5281/zenodo.14001119</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1951-1041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2129-1989</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0253-3663</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8705-5666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1377-2339</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1085-3683</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8880-9650</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6852-1019</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4581-6444</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14001119
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_5281_zenodo_14001119
source DataCite
subjects Agricultural sciences
FOS: Agricultural sciences
Soil sciences
title EJPSOIL-SoilX: Final Project Report
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A51%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=EJPSOIL-SoilX:%20Final%20Project%20Report&rft.au=Holzk%C3%A4mper,%20Annelie&rft.date=2024-10-28&rft_id=info:doi/10.5281/zenodo.14001119&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_5281_zenodo_14001119%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true