Figure 3 in Quantum yield, chlorophyll, and cell damage in yellow passion fruit under irrigation strategies with brackish water and potassium

Figure 3. Electrolyte leakage - % IEL (A) and relative water content - RWC (B) of yellow passion fruit plants 'BRS GA1' as a function of the interaction between the use of brackish water irrigation strategies and potassium doses at 445 and 360 days after transplanting, respectively. Vertic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Pinheiro, F. W. A., de Lima, G. S., Gheyi, H. R., Soares, L. A. dos A., Nobre, R. G., Silva, L. de A., de Lacerda, C. F., Fernandes, P. D.
Format: Bild
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Pinheiro, F. W. A.
de Lima, G. S.
Gheyi, H. R.
Soares, L. A. dos A.
Nobre, R. G.
Silva, L. de A.
de Lacerda, C. F.
Fernandes, P. D.
description Figure 3. Electrolyte leakage - % IEL (A) and relative water content - RWC (B) of yellow passion fruit plants 'BRS GA1' as a function of the interaction between the use of brackish water irrigation strategies and potassium doses at 445 and 360 days after transplanting, respectively. Vertical bars represent the standard error of mean (n = 4). Means followed by the same lowercase letters indicate no significant difference between management strategies by the Scott-Knott test (p≤0.05) for the same potassium dose, and the same uppercase letters indicate no significant difference between potassium doses by the Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05) for the same strategy. For details of BWIS see Table 4.
doi_str_mv 10.5281/zenodo.12728009
format Image
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_5281_zenodo_12728009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5281_zenodo_12728009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_5281_zenodo_127280093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj7FOw0AQRK-hiAJ12v2AkNiOIpIaEdEi0Z82vrW94nxn7e3JMv_APxND8gGpRjOaGekZsyqLzb46lNtvCtHFTVm9VIeiOC7Mz4nbLAQ74AAfGYPmHiYm79ZQdz5KHLrJ-zVgcFCT9-Cwx5bm-nSxcYQBU-IYoJHMCjk4EmARblHnOKmgUsuUYGTt4CxYf3HqYLzE8vc7RJ0_cv9oHhr0iZ6uujTb09vn6_uzQ8Walewg3KNMtizsDGT_gewNaHf_4hf6Yl5e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>image</recordtype></control><display><type>image</type><title>Figure 3 in Quantum yield, chlorophyll, and cell damage in yellow passion fruit under irrigation strategies with brackish water and potassium</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Pinheiro, F. W. A. ; de Lima, G. S. ; Gheyi, H. R. ; Soares, L. A. dos A. ; Nobre, R. G. ; Silva, L. de A. ; de Lacerda, C. F. ; Fernandes, P. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pinheiro, F. W. A. ; de Lima, G. S. ; Gheyi, H. R. ; Soares, L. A. dos A. ; Nobre, R. G. ; Silva, L. de A. ; de Lacerda, C. F. ; Fernandes, P. D.</creatorcontrib><description>Figure 3. Electrolyte leakage - % IEL (A) and relative water content - RWC (B) of yellow passion fruit plants 'BRS GA1' as a function of the interaction between the use of brackish water irrigation strategies and potassium doses at 445 and 360 days after transplanting, respectively. Vertical bars represent the standard error of mean (n = 4). Means followed by the same lowercase letters indicate no significant difference between management strategies by the Scott-Knott test (p≤0.05) for the same potassium dose, and the same uppercase letters indicate no significant difference between potassium doses by the Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05) for the same strategy. For details of BWIS see Table 4.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12728009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Zenodo</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Taxonomy</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1893</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12728009$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pinheiro, F. W. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lima, G. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gheyi, H. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, L. A. dos A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nobre, R. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, L. de A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lacerda, C. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, P. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Figure 3 in Quantum yield, chlorophyll, and cell damage in yellow passion fruit under irrigation strategies with brackish water and potassium</title><description>Figure 3. Electrolyte leakage - % IEL (A) and relative water content - RWC (B) of yellow passion fruit plants 'BRS GA1' as a function of the interaction between the use of brackish water irrigation strategies and potassium doses at 445 and 360 days after transplanting, respectively. Vertical bars represent the standard error of mean (n = 4). Means followed by the same lowercase letters indicate no significant difference between management strategies by the Scott-Knott test (p≤0.05) for the same potassium dose, and the same uppercase letters indicate no significant difference between potassium doses by the Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05) for the same strategy. For details of BWIS see Table 4.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>image</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>image</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNqVj7FOw0AQRK-hiAJ12v2AkNiOIpIaEdEi0Z82vrW94nxn7e3JMv_APxND8gGpRjOaGekZsyqLzb46lNtvCtHFTVm9VIeiOC7Mz4nbLAQ74AAfGYPmHiYm79ZQdz5KHLrJ-zVgcFCT9-Cwx5bm-nSxcYQBU-IYoJHMCjk4EmARblHnOKmgUsuUYGTt4CxYf3HqYLzE8vc7RJ0_cv9oHhr0iZ6uujTb09vn6_uzQ8Walewg3KNMtizsDGT_gewNaHf_4hf6Yl5e</recordid><startdate>20221231</startdate><enddate>20221231</enddate><creator>Pinheiro, F. W. A.</creator><creator>de Lima, G. S.</creator><creator>Gheyi, H. R.</creator><creator>Soares, L. A. dos A.</creator><creator>Nobre, R. G.</creator><creator>Silva, L. de A.</creator><creator>de Lacerda, C. F.</creator><creator>Fernandes, P. D.</creator><general>Zenodo</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221231</creationdate><title>Figure 3 in Quantum yield, chlorophyll, and cell damage in yellow passion fruit under irrigation strategies with brackish water and potassium</title><author>Pinheiro, F. W. A. ; de Lima, G. S. ; Gheyi, H. R. ; Soares, L. A. dos A. ; Nobre, R. G. ; Silva, L. de A. ; de Lacerda, C. F. ; Fernandes, P. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_5281_zenodo_127280093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>images</rsrctype><prefilter>images</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pinheiro, F. W. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lima, G. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gheyi, H. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, L. A. dos A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nobre, R. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, L. de A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lacerda, C. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, P. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pinheiro, F. W. A.</au><au>de Lima, G. S.</au><au>Gheyi, H. R.</au><au>Soares, L. A. dos A.</au><au>Nobre, R. G.</au><au>Silva, L. de A.</au><au>de Lacerda, C. F.</au><au>Fernandes, P. D.</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><title>Figure 3 in Quantum yield, chlorophyll, and cell damage in yellow passion fruit under irrigation strategies with brackish water and potassium</title><date>2022-12-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>Figure 3. Electrolyte leakage - % IEL (A) and relative water content - RWC (B) of yellow passion fruit plants 'BRS GA1' as a function of the interaction between the use of brackish water irrigation strategies and potassium doses at 445 and 360 days after transplanting, respectively. Vertical bars represent the standard error of mean (n = 4). Means followed by the same lowercase letters indicate no significant difference between management strategies by the Scott-Knott test (p≤0.05) for the same potassium dose, and the same uppercase letters indicate no significant difference between potassium doses by the Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05) for the same strategy. For details of BWIS see Table 4.</abstract><pub>Zenodo</pub><doi>10.5281/zenodo.12728009</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12728009
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_5281_zenodo_12728009
source DataCite
subjects Biodiversity
Taxonomy
title Figure 3 in Quantum yield, chlorophyll, and cell damage in yellow passion fruit under irrigation strategies with brackish water and potassium
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A39%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Pinheiro,%20F.%20W.%20A.&rft.date=2022-12-31&rft_id=info:doi/10.5281/zenodo.12728009&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_5281_zenodo_12728009%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true