Living on the edge: Predicting invertebrate richness and rarity in disturbance-prone aquatic–terrestrial ecosystems
1. Temporal fluctuations in water levels cause the spatial extent of wet and dry habitats to vary in aquatic–terrestrial riverine ecosystems, complicating their biomonitoring. As such, biomonitoring efforts may fail to characterise the species that inhabit such habitats, hampering assessments of the...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1. Temporal fluctuations in water levels cause the spatial extent of wet
and dry habitats to vary in aquatic–terrestrial riverine ecosystems,
complicating their biomonitoring. As such, biomonitoring efforts may fail
to characterise the species that inhabit such habitats, hampering
assessments of their biodiversity and implementation of evidence-informed
management strategies. 2. Relationships between the dynamic
characteristics of aquatic-terrestrial habitats and their communities are
well known. Thus, habitat characteristics may enable estimation of faunal
assemblage characteristics such as taxonomic richness, regardless of
in-channel conditions. 3. We investigated whether indicators summarising
habitat survey data can predict two metrics representing terrestrial
invertebrate assemblages (e.g. taxa richness) in two aquatic–terrestrial
habitats: exposed riverine sediments and dry temporary streams. We also
compared the performance of unimetric and multimetric habitat indicators
in making predictions. 4. In exposed riverine sediments, >88% of
predictions were correlated with observed taxa richness and an index of
conservation status. Values predicted by exposed riverine sediment samples
were correlated with those observed in temporary stream channels with
comparable riparian (i.e. largely agricultural) land use, but not those
observed in channels with contrasting (i.e. more urban) land use. 5.
Unimetric habitat indicators performed similarly to more complex
multimetric indicators, with each explaining ≤6% of the variability in
taxa richness and the index of conservation status. The different spatial
scales at which invertebrates respond to habitat conditions and at which
indicators record habitat conditions, and a more comprehensive training
dataset that incorporates a full range of habitat conditions (i.e. land
use), may improve future predictions. 6. We demonstrate that invertebrate
assemblage characteristics can be predicted regardless of in-channel
conditions. Agreement between exposed riverine sediment predictions and
temporary stream observations suggests that these predictions are
transferable among a range of aquatic–terrestrial habitat types, and could
thus be widely applied to aid conservation of riverine biodiversity in
dynamic aquatic–terrestrial ecosystems. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.xwdbrv1hg |