Host-plant choices determined by reproductive interference between closely related butterflies
A number of empirical studies have concluded that reproductive interference, RI, contributes to parapatric species distributions or sexual exclusion. However, the possibility that divergent host-plant use in phytophagous insects is due to sexual exclusion has seldom been considered. Here we present...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A number of empirical studies have concluded that reproductive
interference, RI, contributes to parapatric species distributions or
sexual exclusion. However, the possibility that divergent host-plant use
in phytophagous insects is due to sexual exclusion has seldom been
considered. Here we present evidence that RI is responsible for different
host-plant use by two Pierid butterfly species, Pieris napi and P. melete
. When a novel host species was introduced about 50 years ago, two Pierid
butterfly species at first used both the ancestral host species and the
novel one. Subsequently, P. napi shifted to use only the novel host, while
P. melete shifted to specialize on the ancestral host. To explain these
patterns, we investigated whether the two host species differ in
suitability for larval growth and survival. Additionally, we tested
whether RI occurred between the two species using large outdoor field
cages. Courtship of females by conspecific and heterospecific males
reduces the number of eggs laid by approximately half. However, RI is
asymmetric and would generate selection on P. melete females to evolve to
avoid the more suitable host species preferred by P. napi . Thus, our
study suggests that sexual exclusion can explain the shift in host use by
these two butterfly species. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.s7h44j149 |