Opposing community assembly patterns for dominant and non-dominant plant species in herbaceous ecosystems globally

Biotic and abiotic factors interact with dominant plants —the locally most frequent or with the largest coverage— and non-dominant plants differently, partially because dominant plants modify the environment where non-dominant plants grow. For instance, if dominant plants compete strongly, they will...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Arnillas, Carlos Alberto, Borer, Elizabeth, Seabloom, Eric, Alberti, Juan, Baez, Selene, Bakker, Jonathon, Boughton, Elizabeth, Buckley, Yvonne, Bugalho, Miguel, Donohue, Ian, Dwyer, John, Firn, Jennifer, Gridzak, Riley, Hagenah, Nicole, Hautier, Yann, Helm, Aveliina, Jentsch, Anke, Knops, Johannes (Jean) M H, Komatsu, Kimberly, Laanisto, Lauri, Laungani, Ramesh, McCulley, Rebecca, Moore, Joslin, Morgan, John, Peri, Pablo, Power, Sally, Price, Jodi, Sankaran, Mahesh, Schamp, Brandon, Speziale, Karina, Standish, Rachel, Virtanen, Risto, Cadotte, Marc
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Biotic and abiotic factors interact with dominant plants —the locally most frequent or with the largest coverage— and non-dominant plants differently, partially because dominant plants modify the environment where non-dominant plants grow. For instance, if dominant plants compete strongly, they will deplete most resources, forcing non-dominant plants into a narrower niche space. Conversely, if dominant plants are constrained by the environment, they might not exhaust available resources but instead may ameliorate environmental stressors that usually limit non-dominants. Hence, the nature of interactions among non-dominant species could be modified by dominant species. Furthermore, these differences could translate into a disparity in the phylogenetic relatedness among dominants compared to the relatedness among non-dominants. By estimating phylogenetic dispersion in 78 grasslands across five continents, we found that dominant species were clustered (e.g., co-dominant grasses), suggesting dominant species are likely organized by environmental filtering, and that non-dominant species were either randomly assembled or overdispersed. Traits showed similar trends for those sites (
DOI:10.5061/dryad.pzgmsbcn7