Data from: Whole genome sequencing and phylogenomic analysis show support for the splitting of genus Pythium
The genus Pythium (nom. cons.) sensu lato (s.l.) is composed of many important species of plant pathogens. Early molecular phylogenetic studies suggested paraphyly of Pythium, which led to a formal proposal by Uzuhashi and colleagues in 2010 to split the genus into Pythium sensu stricto (s.s.), Elon...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Nguyen, Hai D. T. Dodge, Annette Dadej, Kasia Rintoul, Tara L. Ponomareva, Ekaterina Martin, Frank N. De Cock, Arthur W. A. M. Levesque, C. Andre Redhead, Scott A. Spies, Christoffel F. J. |
description | The genus Pythium (nom. cons.) sensu lato (s.l.) is composed of many
important species of plant pathogens. Early molecular phylogenetic studies
suggested paraphyly of Pythium, which led to a formal proposal by Uzuhashi
and colleagues in 2010 to split the genus into Pythium sensu stricto
(s.s.), Elongisporangium, Globisporangium,
Ovatisporangium (= Phytopythium), and Pilasporangium using morphological
characters and phylogenies of the mt cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (cox2)
and D1–D2 domains of nuc 28S rDNA. Although the split was fairly justified
by the delineating morphological characters, there were weaknesses in the
molecular analyses, which created reluctance in the scientific community
to adopt these new genera for the description of new species. In this
study, this issue was addressed using phylogenomics. Whole genomes of 109
strains of Pythium and close relatives were sequenced, assembled, and
annotated. These data were combined with 10 genomes sequenced in previous
studies. Phylogenomic analyses were performed with 148 single-copy genes
represented in at least 90% of the taxa in the data set. The results
showed support for the division of Pythium s.l. The status of alternative
generic names that have been used for species of Pythium in the past
(e.g., Artotrogus, Cystosiphon, Eupythium, Nematosporangium,
Rheosporangium, Sphaerosporangium) was investigated. Based on our
molecular analyses and review of the Pythium generic concepts, we urge the
scientific community to adopt the generic names Pythium, Elongisporangium,
Globisporangium, and their concepts as proposed by Uzuhashi and colleagues
in 2010 in their work going forward. In order to consolidate the taxonomy
of these genera, some of the recently described Pythium spp. are
transferred to Elongisporangium and Globisporangium. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5061/dryad.n2z34tmx3 |
format | Dataset |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_n2z34tmx3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5061_dryad_n2z34tmx3</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_n2z34tmx33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjjkLAjEYRNNYiFrbfn_APVy1sPXA0kKwDGGTbAK5zIHGX-_uIvZWAzO84SG0rKtiW-3qkvpMaGHW72YT9auZInUkkQD3Vu_hLqxi0DFjNYPAHomZVpoOiKHgRFZ2nGTbF0TlIAMEYZ8QknPWR-DWQxQ96ZSMcQAtH95SgGuOQiY9RxNOVGCLb85QeT7dDpcV7SVaGRl2XmriM64rPPji0Rf_fJv_iQ8IGFVD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Data from: Whole genome sequencing and phylogenomic analysis show support for the splitting of genus Pythium</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Nguyen, Hai D. T. ; Dodge, Annette ; Dadej, Kasia ; Rintoul, Tara L. ; Ponomareva, Ekaterina ; Martin, Frank N. ; De Cock, Arthur W. A. M. ; Levesque, C. Andre ; Redhead, Scott A. ; Spies, Christoffel F. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Hai D. T. ; Dodge, Annette ; Dadej, Kasia ; Rintoul, Tara L. ; Ponomareva, Ekaterina ; Martin, Frank N. ; De Cock, Arthur W. A. M. ; Levesque, C. Andre ; Redhead, Scott A. ; Spies, Christoffel F. J.</creatorcontrib><description>The genus Pythium (nom. cons.) sensu lato (s.l.) is composed of many
important species of plant pathogens. Early molecular phylogenetic studies
suggested paraphyly of Pythium, which led to a formal proposal by Uzuhashi
and colleagues in 2010 to split the genus into Pythium sensu stricto
(s.s.), Elongisporangium, Globisporangium,
Ovatisporangium (= Phytopythium), and Pilasporangium using morphological
characters and phylogenies of the mt cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (cox2)
and D1–D2 domains of nuc 28S rDNA. Although the split was fairly justified
by the delineating morphological characters, there were weaknesses in the
molecular analyses, which created reluctance in the scientific community
to adopt these new genera for the description of new species. In this
study, this issue was addressed using phylogenomics. Whole genomes of 109
strains of Pythium and close relatives were sequenced, assembled, and
annotated. These data were combined with 10 genomes sequenced in previous
studies. Phylogenomic analyses were performed with 148 single-copy genes
represented in at least 90% of the taxa in the data set. The results
showed support for the division of Pythium s.l. The status of alternative
generic names that have been used for species of Pythium in the past
(e.g., Artotrogus, Cystosiphon, Eupythium, Nematosporangium,
Rheosporangium, Sphaerosporangium) was investigated. Based on our
molecular analyses and review of the Pythium generic concepts, we urge the
scientific community to adopt the generic names Pythium, Elongisporangium,
Globisporangium, and their concepts as proposed by Uzuhashi and colleagues
in 2010 in their work going forward. In order to consolidate the taxonomy
of these genera, some of the recently described Pythium spp. are
transferred to Elongisporangium and Globisporangium.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.5061/dryad.n2z34tmx3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dryad</publisher><subject>FOS: Agricultural sciences</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-4764-3009</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1894</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n2z34tmx3$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Hai D. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodge, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dadej, Kasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rintoul, Tara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponomareva, Ekaterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Frank N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Cock, Arthur W. A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levesque, C. Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redhead, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spies, Christoffel F. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Data from: Whole genome sequencing and phylogenomic analysis show support for the splitting of genus Pythium</title><description>The genus Pythium (nom. cons.) sensu lato (s.l.) is composed of many
important species of plant pathogens. Early molecular phylogenetic studies
suggested paraphyly of Pythium, which led to a formal proposal by Uzuhashi
and colleagues in 2010 to split the genus into Pythium sensu stricto
(s.s.), Elongisporangium, Globisporangium,
Ovatisporangium (= Phytopythium), and Pilasporangium using morphological
characters and phylogenies of the mt cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (cox2)
and D1–D2 domains of nuc 28S rDNA. Although the split was fairly justified
by the delineating morphological characters, there were weaknesses in the
molecular analyses, which created reluctance in the scientific community
to adopt these new genera for the description of new species. In this
study, this issue was addressed using phylogenomics. Whole genomes of 109
strains of Pythium and close relatives were sequenced, assembled, and
annotated. These data were combined with 10 genomes sequenced in previous
studies. Phylogenomic analyses were performed with 148 single-copy genes
represented in at least 90% of the taxa in the data set. The results
showed support for the division of Pythium s.l. The status of alternative
generic names that have been used for species of Pythium in the past
(e.g., Artotrogus, Cystosiphon, Eupythium, Nematosporangium,
Rheosporangium, Sphaerosporangium) was investigated. Based on our
molecular analyses and review of the Pythium generic concepts, we urge the
scientific community to adopt the generic names Pythium, Elongisporangium,
Globisporangium, and their concepts as proposed by Uzuhashi and colleagues
in 2010 in their work going forward. In order to consolidate the taxonomy
of these genera, some of the recently described Pythium spp. are
transferred to Elongisporangium and Globisporangium.</description><subject>FOS: Agricultural sciences</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjjkLAjEYRNNYiFrbfn_APVy1sPXA0kKwDGGTbAK5zIHGX-_uIvZWAzO84SG0rKtiW-3qkvpMaGHW72YT9auZInUkkQD3Vu_hLqxi0DFjNYPAHomZVpoOiKHgRFZ2nGTbF0TlIAMEYZ8QknPWR-DWQxQ96ZSMcQAtH95SgGuOQiY9RxNOVGCLb85QeT7dDpcV7SVaGRl2XmriM64rPPji0Rf_fJv_iQ8IGFVD</recordid><startdate>20220617</startdate><enddate>20220617</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Hai D. T.</creator><creator>Dodge, Annette</creator><creator>Dadej, Kasia</creator><creator>Rintoul, Tara L.</creator><creator>Ponomareva, Ekaterina</creator><creator>Martin, Frank N.</creator><creator>De Cock, Arthur W. A. M.</creator><creator>Levesque, C. Andre</creator><creator>Redhead, Scott A.</creator><creator>Spies, Christoffel F. J.</creator><general>Dryad</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4764-3009</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220617</creationdate><title>Data from: Whole genome sequencing and phylogenomic analysis show support for the splitting of genus Pythium</title><author>Nguyen, Hai D. T. ; Dodge, Annette ; Dadej, Kasia ; Rintoul, Tara L. ; Ponomareva, Ekaterina ; Martin, Frank N. ; De Cock, Arthur W. A. M. ; Levesque, C. Andre ; Redhead, Scott A. ; Spies, Christoffel F. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_n2z34tmx33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>FOS: Agricultural sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Hai D. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodge, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dadej, Kasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rintoul, Tara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponomareva, Ekaterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Frank N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Cock, Arthur W. A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levesque, C. Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redhead, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spies, Christoffel F. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Hai D. T.</au><au>Dodge, Annette</au><au>Dadej, Kasia</au><au>Rintoul, Tara L.</au><au>Ponomareva, Ekaterina</au><au>Martin, Frank N.</au><au>De Cock, Arthur W. A. M.</au><au>Levesque, C. Andre</au><au>Redhead, Scott A.</au><au>Spies, Christoffel F. J.</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Data from: Whole genome sequencing and phylogenomic analysis show support for the splitting of genus Pythium</title><date>2022-06-17</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>The genus Pythium (nom. cons.) sensu lato (s.l.) is composed of many
important species of plant pathogens. Early molecular phylogenetic studies
suggested paraphyly of Pythium, which led to a formal proposal by Uzuhashi
and colleagues in 2010 to split the genus into Pythium sensu stricto
(s.s.), Elongisporangium, Globisporangium,
Ovatisporangium (= Phytopythium), and Pilasporangium using morphological
characters and phylogenies of the mt cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (cox2)
and D1–D2 domains of nuc 28S rDNA. Although the split was fairly justified
by the delineating morphological characters, there were weaknesses in the
molecular analyses, which created reluctance in the scientific community
to adopt these new genera for the description of new species. In this
study, this issue was addressed using phylogenomics. Whole genomes of 109
strains of Pythium and close relatives were sequenced, assembled, and
annotated. These data were combined with 10 genomes sequenced in previous
studies. Phylogenomic analyses were performed with 148 single-copy genes
represented in at least 90% of the taxa in the data set. The results
showed support for the division of Pythium s.l. The status of alternative
generic names that have been used for species of Pythium in the past
(e.g., Artotrogus, Cystosiphon, Eupythium, Nematosporangium,
Rheosporangium, Sphaerosporangium) was investigated. Based on our
molecular analyses and review of the Pythium generic concepts, we urge the
scientific community to adopt the generic names Pythium, Elongisporangium,
Globisporangium, and their concepts as proposed by Uzuhashi and colleagues
in 2010 in their work going forward. In order to consolidate the taxonomy
of these genera, some of the recently described Pythium spp. are
transferred to Elongisporangium and Globisporangium.</abstract><pub>Dryad</pub><doi>10.5061/dryad.n2z34tmx3</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4764-3009</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | DOI: 10.5061/dryad.n2z34tmx3 |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_n2z34tmx3 |
source | DataCite |
subjects | FOS: Agricultural sciences |
title | Data from: Whole genome sequencing and phylogenomic analysis show support for the splitting of genus Pythium |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T05%3A27%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Hai%20D.%20T.&rft.date=2022-06-17&rft_id=info:doi/10.5061/dryad.n2z34tmx3&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_5061_dryad_n2z34tmx3%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |