Data from: Why are some plant—nectar robber interactions commensalisms?
Many plants that bear hidden or recessed floral nectar experience nectar robbing, the removal of nectar by a floral visitor through holes pierced in the corolla. Although robbing can reduce plant reproductive success, many studies fail to find such effects. We outline three mechanistic hypotheses th...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Many plants that bear hidden or recessed floral nectar experience nectar
robbing, the removal of nectar by a floral visitor through holes pierced
in the corolla. Although robbing can reduce plant reproductive success,
many studies fail to find such effects. We outline three mechanistic
hypotheses that can explain when interactions between plants and
nectar-robbers should be commensilistic rather than antagonistic: the
non-discrimination (pollinators do not avoid robbed flowers), visitor
prevalence (robber visitation is rare relative to pollinator visitation),
and pollen saturation (stigmas receive sufficient pollen to fertilize all
ovules with one or very few pollinator visits) hypotheses. We then explore
these mechanisms in the North American subalpine, bumble bee-pollinated
and nectar-robbed plant Corydalis caseana (Fumariaceae). We first
confirmed that the effects of nectar robbing on female reproductive
success were neutral in C. caseana. We then tested the three mechanisms
underlying neutral effects using a combination of observational studies
and experiments. We found evidence for all three mechanisms. First,
consistent with the non-discrimination hypothesis, pollinators failed to
discriminate against experimentally robbed flowers or inflorescences even
though naturally robbed flowers offered significantly lower nectar rewards
than unrobbed flowers. Second, C. caseana was more commonly visited by
pollinators than by nectar robbers, in accordance with the visitor
prevalence hypothesis. Third, stigmas of virgin (unvisited) flowers as
well as those visited once by pollinators were saturated with pollen, with
all stigmas bearing pollen loads several orders of magnitude higher than
the number of ovules per fruit, consistent with the pollen saturation
hypothesis. Our investigation of the mechanisms driving the commensal
outcome of nectar robbing in this system deepens our understanding of the
ecology of nectar robbing and contributes to a more general understanding
of the variation in the outcomes of interactions between species. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.bh6hs70 |