Data from: The roles of non-production vegetation in agroecosystems: a research framework for filling process knowledge gaps in a social-ecological context
1. An ever-expanding human population, climatic changes, and the spread of intensive farming practices is putting increasing pressure on agroecosystems and their inherent biodiversity. Non-production vegetation elements, such as woody patches, riparian margins, and restoration plantings, are vital f...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1. An ever-expanding human population, climatic changes, and the spread of
intensive farming practices is putting increasing pressure on
agroecosystems and their inherent biodiversity. Non-production vegetation
elements, such as woody patches, riparian margins, and restoration
plantings, are vital for conserving agroecosystem biodiversity. Further,
such elements are key building blocks that are manipulated via land
management, thereby influencing the biotic and abiotic processes that
underpin functioning agroecosystems. 2. Despite this critical role, there
has been a lack of synthesis on which types of vegetation elements drive
and/or support ecological processes, and the mechanisms by which this
occurs. Using a systematic, quantitative literature review of 342
articles, we asked: what are the effects of non-production vegetation on
agroecosystem processes and how are these processes measured within global
agroecosystems? 3. Woody patches, hedgerows and borders, riparian margins,
and shelterbelts were the most studied types of non-production vegetation.
The majority (61%) of studies showed positive effects of non-production
vegetation on ecological processes, where the presence, level or rate of
the studied process was increased or enhanced. 4. However, four key
research gaps were revealed: (1) most studies (83%) used proxies for,
instead of direct measurements of, ecosystem processes related to
non-production vegetation; (2) study designs used to investigate
non-production vegetation effects on ecosystem processes directly were
largely limited to observational comparisons of non-production vegetation
types, farm-scale vegetation configurations, and different proximities to
vegetation in terms of the effect on ecological processes; relatively few
studies used manipulative experiments (3) the relatively few studies
directly measuring ecosystem processes were dominated by four process
categories: invertebrate biocontrol, predator and natural enemy spillover,
animal movement, and ecosystem cycling, and (4) the methods used to
directly measure non-production vegetation effects comprised a
surprisingly limited set of approaches. 5. To fill key research gaps that
will inform the use of non-production vegetation to enhance agroecosystem
processes, we present a framework for future research that emphasises the
need to combine an understanding of human decision making with
carefully-designed and targeted investigations into the roles of taxa,
ecosystem processes, a |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.8931zcrmn |