Data from: Host-associated genomic differentiation in congeneric butterflies: now you see it, now you don’t
Ecotypic variation among populations may become associated with widespread genomic differentiation, but theory predicts that this should happen only under particular conditions of gene flow, selection and population size. In closely related species, we might expect the strength of host-associated ge...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Ecotypic variation among populations may become associated with widespread
genomic differentiation, but theory predicts that this should happen only
under particular conditions of gene flow, selection and population size.
In closely related species, we might expect the strength of
host-associated genomic differentiation (HAD) to be correlated with the
degree of phenotypic differentiation in host-adaptive traits. Using
microsatellite and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) markers,
and controlling for isolation by distance between populations, we sought
HAD in two congeneric species of butterflies with different degrees of
host plant specialization. Prior work on Euphydryas editha had shown
strong interpopulation differentiation in host-adapted traits, resulting
in incipient reproductive isolation among host-associated ecotypes. We
show here that Euphydryas aurinia had much weaker host-associated
phenotypic differentiation. Contrary to our expectations, we detected HAD
in Euphydryas aurinia, but not in E. editha. Even within an E. aurinia
population that fed on both hosts, we found weak but significant sympatric
HAD that persisted in samples taken 9 years apart. The finding of
significantly stronger HAD in the system with less phenotypic
differentiation may seem paradoxical. Our findings can be explained by
multiple factors, ranging from differences in dispersal or effective
population size, to spatial variation in genomic or phenotypic traits and
to structure induced by past histories of host-adapted populations. Other
infrequently measured factors, such as differences in recombination rates,
may also play a role. Our result adds to recent work as a further caution
against assumptions of simple relationships between genomic and adaptive
phenotypic differentiation. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.1v0tb |