Urban Risk Factors for Human Rift Valley Fever virus exposure in Kenya

The Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is a zoonotic arbovirus that can also transmit directly to humans from livestock. Previous studies have shown consumption of sick animal products are risk factors for RVFV infection, but it is difficult to disentangle those risk factors from other livestock rearing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Gerken, Keli, LaBeaud, Desiree, Mutuku, Francis, Ndenga, Bryson, Agola, Gladys, Rezende, Izabela, Shaita, Karren, Fabre, Eduardo, Migliore, Eleonora
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Gerken, Keli
LaBeaud, Desiree
Mutuku, Francis
Ndenga, Bryson
Agola, Gladys
Rezende, Izabela
Shaita, Karren
Fabre, Eduardo
Migliore, Eleonora
description The Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is a zoonotic arbovirus that can also transmit directly to humans from livestock. Previous studies have shown consumption of sick animal products are risk factors for RVFV infection, but it is difficult to disentangle those risk factors from other livestock rearing activities. Urban areas have an increased demand for animal source foods, different vector distributions, and various arboviruses are understood to establish localized urban transmission cycles. Thus far, RVFV is an unevaluated public health risk in urban areas within endemic regions. We tested participants in our ongoing urban cohort study on dengue (DENV) and chikungunya (CHIKV) virus for RVFV exposure and found 1.6% (57/3,560) of individuals in two urban areas of Kenya had anti-RVFV IgG antibodies. 88% (50/57) of RVFV exposed participants also had co-exposure to DENV, CHIKV, or both. Although livestock ownership was very low in urban study sites, RVFV exposure was significantly associated with seeing goats and poultry around the homestead (p=0.04) and consumption of raw milk (p=0.02) in multivariate modeling. Risk of exposure to RVFV was three times higher (OR=3.3 [95%CI: 0.86-12.5], p=0.07) among those buying unpasteurized milk from milk vendors or directly from dairy owners compared to those that purchased commercialized packets of milk. In addition, lack of piped water and use of small jugs (15-20 liters) for water was associated with a higher risk of RVFV exposure (p=0.002) and may contribute to interepidemic vector-borne maintenance of RVFV. This study provides baseline evidence to guide future studies investigating the urban potential of RVFV and highlights the unexplored role of animal products in continued spread of RVFV.
doi_str_mv 10.25740/fp177dq8431
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_25740_fp177dq8431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_25740_fp177dq8431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_25740_fp177dq84313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBAxNNAzMjU3MdBPKzA0N08ptDAxNuRkcAstSkrMUwjKLM5WcEtMLskvKlZIyy9S8CjNBQunlSiEJebkpFYquKWWpRYplGUWlRYrpFYU5BeXFqUqZOYpeKfmVSbyMLCmJeYUp_JCaW4GHTfXEGcP3ZTEksTkzJLU-IKizNzEosp4Q4N4sDPikZxhTKJyAF64P3E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Urban Risk Factors for Human Rift Valley Fever virus exposure in Kenya</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Gerken, Keli ; LaBeaud, Desiree ; Mutuku, Francis ; Ndenga, Bryson ; Agola, Gladys ; Rezende, Izabela ; Shaita, Karren ; Fabre, Eduardo ; Migliore, Eleonora</creator><creatorcontrib>Gerken, Keli ; LaBeaud, Desiree ; Mutuku, Francis ; Ndenga, Bryson ; Agola, Gladys ; Rezende, Izabela ; Shaita, Karren ; Fabre, Eduardo ; Migliore, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><description>The Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is a zoonotic arbovirus that can also transmit directly to humans from livestock. Previous studies have shown consumption of sick animal products are risk factors for RVFV infection, but it is difficult to disentangle those risk factors from other livestock rearing activities. Urban areas have an increased demand for animal source foods, different vector distributions, and various arboviruses are understood to establish localized urban transmission cycles. Thus far, RVFV is an unevaluated public health risk in urban areas within endemic regions. We tested participants in our ongoing urban cohort study on dengue (DENV) and chikungunya (CHIKV) virus for RVFV exposure and found 1.6% (57/3,560) of individuals in two urban areas of Kenya had anti-RVFV IgG antibodies. 88% (50/57) of RVFV exposed participants also had co-exposure to DENV, CHIKV, or both. Although livestock ownership was very low in urban study sites, RVFV exposure was significantly associated with seeing goats and poultry around the homestead (p=0.04) and consumption of raw milk (p=0.02) in multivariate modeling. Risk of exposure to RVFV was three times higher (OR=3.3 [95%CI: 0.86-12.5], p=0.07) among those buying unpasteurized milk from milk vendors or directly from dairy owners compared to those that purchased commercialized packets of milk. In addition, lack of piped water and use of small jugs (15-20 liters) for water was associated with a higher risk of RVFV exposure (p=0.002) and may contribute to interepidemic vector-borne maintenance of RVFV. This study provides baseline evidence to guide future studies investigating the urban potential of RVFV and highlights the unexplored role of animal products in continued spread of RVFV.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.25740/fp177dq8431</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stanford Digital Repository</publisher><subject>Rift Valley Fever, RVFV, epidemiology, Kenya, urban, zoonotic</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25740/fp177dq8431$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gerken, Keli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaBeaud, Desiree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutuku, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ndenga, Bryson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agola, Gladys</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezende, Izabela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaita, Karren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabre, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Migliore, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><title>Urban Risk Factors for Human Rift Valley Fever virus exposure in Kenya</title><description>The Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is a zoonotic arbovirus that can also transmit directly to humans from livestock. Previous studies have shown consumption of sick animal products are risk factors for RVFV infection, but it is difficult to disentangle those risk factors from other livestock rearing activities. Urban areas have an increased demand for animal source foods, different vector distributions, and various arboviruses are understood to establish localized urban transmission cycles. Thus far, RVFV is an unevaluated public health risk in urban areas within endemic regions. We tested participants in our ongoing urban cohort study on dengue (DENV) and chikungunya (CHIKV) virus for RVFV exposure and found 1.6% (57/3,560) of individuals in two urban areas of Kenya had anti-RVFV IgG antibodies. 88% (50/57) of RVFV exposed participants also had co-exposure to DENV, CHIKV, or both. Although livestock ownership was very low in urban study sites, RVFV exposure was significantly associated with seeing goats and poultry around the homestead (p=0.04) and consumption of raw milk (p=0.02) in multivariate modeling. Risk of exposure to RVFV was three times higher (OR=3.3 [95%CI: 0.86-12.5], p=0.07) among those buying unpasteurized milk from milk vendors or directly from dairy owners compared to those that purchased commercialized packets of milk. In addition, lack of piped water and use of small jugs (15-20 liters) for water was associated with a higher risk of RVFV exposure (p=0.002) and may contribute to interepidemic vector-borne maintenance of RVFV. This study provides baseline evidence to guide future studies investigating the urban potential of RVFV and highlights the unexplored role of animal products in continued spread of RVFV.</description><subject>Rift Valley Fever, RVFV, epidemiology, Kenya, urban, zoonotic</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYBAxNNAzMjU3MdBPKzA0N08ptDAxNuRkcAstSkrMUwjKLM5WcEtMLskvKlZIyy9S8CjNBQunlSiEJebkpFYquKWWpRYplGUWlRYrpFYU5BeXFqUqZOYpeKfmVSbyMLCmJeYUp_JCaW4GHTfXEGcP3ZTEksTkzJLU-IKizNzEosp4Q4N4sDPikZxhTKJyAF64P3E</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Gerken, Keli</creator><creator>LaBeaud, Desiree</creator><creator>Mutuku, Francis</creator><creator>Ndenga, Bryson</creator><creator>Agola, Gladys</creator><creator>Rezende, Izabela</creator><creator>Shaita, Karren</creator><creator>Fabre, Eduardo</creator><creator>Migliore, Eleonora</creator><general>Stanford Digital Repository</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Urban Risk Factors for Human Rift Valley Fever virus exposure in Kenya</title><author>Gerken, Keli ; LaBeaud, Desiree ; Mutuku, Francis ; Ndenga, Bryson ; Agola, Gladys ; Rezende, Izabela ; Shaita, Karren ; Fabre, Eduardo ; Migliore, Eleonora</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_25740_fp177dq84313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Rift Valley Fever, RVFV, epidemiology, Kenya, urban, zoonotic</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gerken, Keli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaBeaud, Desiree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutuku, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ndenga, Bryson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agola, Gladys</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezende, Izabela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaita, Karren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabre, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Migliore, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gerken, Keli</au><au>LaBeaud, Desiree</au><au>Mutuku, Francis</au><au>Ndenga, Bryson</au><au>Agola, Gladys</au><au>Rezende, Izabela</au><au>Shaita, Karren</au><au>Fabre, Eduardo</au><au>Migliore, Eleonora</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Urban Risk Factors for Human Rift Valley Fever virus exposure in Kenya</title><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>The Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is a zoonotic arbovirus that can also transmit directly to humans from livestock. Previous studies have shown consumption of sick animal products are risk factors for RVFV infection, but it is difficult to disentangle those risk factors from other livestock rearing activities. Urban areas have an increased demand for animal source foods, different vector distributions, and various arboviruses are understood to establish localized urban transmission cycles. Thus far, RVFV is an unevaluated public health risk in urban areas within endemic regions. We tested participants in our ongoing urban cohort study on dengue (DENV) and chikungunya (CHIKV) virus for RVFV exposure and found 1.6% (57/3,560) of individuals in two urban areas of Kenya had anti-RVFV IgG antibodies. 88% (50/57) of RVFV exposed participants also had co-exposure to DENV, CHIKV, or both. Although livestock ownership was very low in urban study sites, RVFV exposure was significantly associated with seeing goats and poultry around the homestead (p=0.04) and consumption of raw milk (p=0.02) in multivariate modeling. Risk of exposure to RVFV was three times higher (OR=3.3 [95%CI: 0.86-12.5], p=0.07) among those buying unpasteurized milk from milk vendors or directly from dairy owners compared to those that purchased commercialized packets of milk. In addition, lack of piped water and use of small jugs (15-20 liters) for water was associated with a higher risk of RVFV exposure (p=0.002) and may contribute to interepidemic vector-borne maintenance of RVFV. This study provides baseline evidence to guide future studies investigating the urban potential of RVFV and highlights the unexplored role of animal products in continued spread of RVFV.</abstract><pub>Stanford Digital Repository</pub><doi>10.25740/fp177dq8431</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.25740/fp177dq8431
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_25740_fp177dq8431
source DataCite
subjects Rift Valley Fever, RVFV, epidemiology, Kenya, urban, zoonotic
title Urban Risk Factors for Human Rift Valley Fever virus exposure in Kenya
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T15%3A54%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Gerken,%20Keli&rft.date=2022&rft_id=info:doi/10.25740/fp177dq8431&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_25740_fp177dq8431%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true