Dataset associated with “What’s in a name? The paradox of citizen science and community science”

Citizen science has expanded ecological and environmental sciences by making possible studies across greater spatial and temporal scales while incorporating local expertise and interests that might otherwise be overlooked. Broadly, citizen science involves the public in the process of science. Howev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Lin Hunter, Danielle, Newman, Gregory, Balgopal, Meena
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Lin Hunter, Danielle
Newman, Gregory
Balgopal, Meena
description Citizen science has expanded ecological and environmental sciences by making possible studies across greater spatial and temporal scales while incorporating local expertise and interests that might otherwise be overlooked. Broadly, citizen science involves the public in the process of science. However, it continues to struggle to engage diverse participants. Citizen science project coordinators are increasingly trying to promote inclusivity by rebranding as “community science” to avoid the term “citizen.” Rebranding efforts, while well-intentioned, are uninformed by research, as we lack an evidenced-based understanding of these terms. We distributed a survey to those who participate in citizen and community science. We found differences in how well known and accepted the terms are, who is perceived as initiating and benefiting from the projects, and associated levels of inclusivity. Our findings have important implications for those involved in citizen and community science seeking to better describe projects in the future.
doi_str_mv 10.25675/10217/234061
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_25675_10217_234061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_25675_10217_234061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_25675_10217_2340613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjk0OgjAUhLtxYdSl-3cBhILA0oU_8QAkLpuX8ghNbCG0RnHFNUz0cpxEgnoAV5NMJt98jC15sArjJI19HoQ89cNoHSR8yoodOrTkAK2tpEJHOVyVK6HvnqcSXd89LCgDCAY1bSArCWpsMK9uUBUglVN3MmClIiMJ0OQgK60vRrn21_bda84mBZ4tLb45Y95hn22PXj7cDxASdaM0Nq3ggRg9xegpPp7Rv_s3tRNMaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Dataset associated with “What’s in a name? The paradox of citizen science and community science”</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Lin Hunter, Danielle ; Newman, Gregory ; Balgopal, Meena</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin Hunter, Danielle ; Newman, Gregory ; Balgopal, Meena</creatorcontrib><description>Citizen science has expanded ecological and environmental sciences by making possible studies across greater spatial and temporal scales while incorporating local expertise and interests that might otherwise be overlooked. Broadly, citizen science involves the public in the process of science. However, it continues to struggle to engage diverse participants. Citizen science project coordinators are increasingly trying to promote inclusivity by rebranding as “community science” to avoid the term “citizen.” Rebranding efforts, while well-intentioned, are uninformed by research, as we lack an evidenced-based understanding of these terms. We distributed a survey to those who participate in citizen and community science. We found differences in how well known and accepted the terms are, who is perceived as initiating and benefiting from the projects, and associated levels of inclusivity. Our findings have important implications for those involved in citizen and community science seeking to better describe projects in the future.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.25675/10217/234061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mountain Scholar</publisher><subject>citizen science ; community science ; diversity ; environmental communication ; evidence-based practice ; inclusivity ; science communication</subject><creationdate>2021</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25675/10217/234061$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin Hunter, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balgopal, Meena</creatorcontrib><title>Dataset associated with “What’s in a name? The paradox of citizen science and community science”</title><description>Citizen science has expanded ecological and environmental sciences by making possible studies across greater spatial and temporal scales while incorporating local expertise and interests that might otherwise be overlooked. Broadly, citizen science involves the public in the process of science. However, it continues to struggle to engage diverse participants. Citizen science project coordinators are increasingly trying to promote inclusivity by rebranding as “community science” to avoid the term “citizen.” Rebranding efforts, while well-intentioned, are uninformed by research, as we lack an evidenced-based understanding of these terms. We distributed a survey to those who participate in citizen and community science. We found differences in how well known and accepted the terms are, who is perceived as initiating and benefiting from the projects, and associated levels of inclusivity. Our findings have important implications for those involved in citizen and community science seeking to better describe projects in the future.</description><subject>citizen science</subject><subject>community science</subject><subject>diversity</subject><subject>environmental communication</subject><subject>evidence-based practice</subject><subject>inclusivity</subject><subject>science communication</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjk0OgjAUhLtxYdSl-3cBhILA0oU_8QAkLpuX8ghNbCG0RnHFNUz0cpxEgnoAV5NMJt98jC15sArjJI19HoQ89cNoHSR8yoodOrTkAK2tpEJHOVyVK6HvnqcSXd89LCgDCAY1bSArCWpsMK9uUBUglVN3MmClIiMJ0OQgK60vRrn21_bda84mBZ4tLb45Y95hn22PXj7cDxASdaM0Nq3ggRg9xegpPp7Rv_s3tRNMaQ</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Lin Hunter, Danielle</creator><creator>Newman, Gregory</creator><creator>Balgopal, Meena</creator><general>Mountain Scholar</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Dataset associated with “What’s in a name? The paradox of citizen science and community science”</title><author>Lin Hunter, Danielle ; Newman, Gregory ; Balgopal, Meena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_25675_10217_2340613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>citizen science</topic><topic>community science</topic><topic>diversity</topic><topic>environmental communication</topic><topic>evidence-based practice</topic><topic>inclusivity</topic><topic>science communication</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin Hunter, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balgopal, Meena</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin Hunter, Danielle</au><au>Newman, Gregory</au><au>Balgopal, Meena</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Dataset associated with “What’s in a name? The paradox of citizen science and community science”</title><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>Citizen science has expanded ecological and environmental sciences by making possible studies across greater spatial and temporal scales while incorporating local expertise and interests that might otherwise be overlooked. Broadly, citizen science involves the public in the process of science. However, it continues to struggle to engage diverse participants. Citizen science project coordinators are increasingly trying to promote inclusivity by rebranding as “community science” to avoid the term “citizen.” Rebranding efforts, while well-intentioned, are uninformed by research, as we lack an evidenced-based understanding of these terms. We distributed a survey to those who participate in citizen and community science. We found differences in how well known and accepted the terms are, who is perceived as initiating and benefiting from the projects, and associated levels of inclusivity. Our findings have important implications for those involved in citizen and community science seeking to better describe projects in the future.</abstract><pub>Mountain Scholar</pub><doi>10.25675/10217/234061</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.25675/10217/234061
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_25675_10217_234061
source DataCite
subjects citizen science
community science
diversity
environmental communication
evidence-based practice
inclusivity
science communication
title Dataset associated with “What’s in a name? The paradox of citizen science and community science”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A00%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Lin%20Hunter,%20Danielle&rft.date=2021&rft_id=info:doi/10.25675/10217/234061&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_25675_10217_234061%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true