AMIRI_TSC_2020.zip

Context:Various patterns of dynamic routing architectures are used in service- and cloud-based environments, including sidecar-based routing, routing through a central entity such as an event store, or architectures with multiple dynamic routers.Objective:Choosing the wrong architecture may severely...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Amiri, Amirali, Zdun, Uwe, van Hoorn, André
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Amiri, Amirali
Zdun, Uwe
van Hoorn, André
description Context:Various patterns of dynamic routing architectures are used in service- and cloud-based environments, including sidecar-based routing, routing through a central entity such as an event store, or architectures with multiple dynamic routers.Objective:Choosing the wrong architecture may severely impact the reliability or performance of a software system. This article’s objective is to provide models and empirical evidence to precisely estimate the reliability and performance impacts.Method:We propose an analytical model of request loss for reliability modeling. We studied the accuracy of this model’s predictions empirically and calculated the error rate in 200 experiment runs, during which we measured the round-trip time performance and created a performance model based on multiple regression analysis. Finally, we systematically analyzed the reliability and performance impacts and trade-offs.Results and Conclusions:The comparison of the empirical data to the reliability model’s predictions shows a low enough and converging error rate for using the model during system architecting. The predictions of the performance model show that distributed approaches for dynamic data routing have a better performance compared to centralized solutions. Our results provide important new insights on dynamic routing architecture decisions to precisely estimate the trade-off between system reliability and performance.
doi_str_mv 10.21227/67gs-te07
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_21227_67gs_te07</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_21227_67gs_te07</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_21227_67gs_te073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBAyNNAzMjQyMtc3M08v1i1JNTDnZBBy9PUM8owPCXaONzIwMtCryizgYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMWm6uIc4euimJJYnJmSWp8QVFmbmJRZXxhgbxYAPjQQbGgww0JkkxAGaeKjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>AMIRI_TSC_2020.zip</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Amiri, Amirali ; Zdun, Uwe ; van Hoorn, André</creator><creatorcontrib>Amiri, Amirali ; Zdun, Uwe ; van Hoorn, André</creatorcontrib><description>Context:Various patterns of dynamic routing architectures are used in service- and cloud-based environments, including sidecar-based routing, routing through a central entity such as an event store, or architectures with multiple dynamic routers.Objective:Choosing the wrong architecture may severely impact the reliability or performance of a software system. This article’s objective is to provide models and empirical evidence to precisely estimate the reliability and performance impacts.Method:We propose an analytical model of request loss for reliability modeling. We studied the accuracy of this model’s predictions empirically and calculated the error rate in 200 experiment runs, during which we measured the round-trip time performance and created a performance model based on multiple regression analysis. Finally, we systematically analyzed the reliability and performance impacts and trade-offs.Results and Conclusions:The comparison of the empirical data to the reliability model’s predictions shows a low enough and converging error rate for using the model during system architecting. The predictions of the performance model show that distributed approaches for dynamic data routing have a better performance compared to centralized solutions. Our results provide important new insights on dynamic routing architecture decisions to precisely estimate the trade-off between system reliability and performance.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.21227/67gs-te07</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE DataPort</publisher><subject>Reliability</subject><creationdate>2020</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-6915-6711</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.21227/67gs-te07$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amiri, Amirali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zdun, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hoorn, André</creatorcontrib><title>AMIRI_TSC_2020.zip</title><description>Context:Various patterns of dynamic routing architectures are used in service- and cloud-based environments, including sidecar-based routing, routing through a central entity such as an event store, or architectures with multiple dynamic routers.Objective:Choosing the wrong architecture may severely impact the reliability or performance of a software system. This article’s objective is to provide models and empirical evidence to precisely estimate the reliability and performance impacts.Method:We propose an analytical model of request loss for reliability modeling. We studied the accuracy of this model’s predictions empirically and calculated the error rate in 200 experiment runs, during which we measured the round-trip time performance and created a performance model based on multiple regression analysis. Finally, we systematically analyzed the reliability and performance impacts and trade-offs.Results and Conclusions:The comparison of the empirical data to the reliability model’s predictions shows a low enough and converging error rate for using the model during system architecting. The predictions of the performance model show that distributed approaches for dynamic data routing have a better performance compared to centralized solutions. Our results provide important new insights on dynamic routing architecture decisions to precisely estimate the trade-off between system reliability and performance.</description><subject>Reliability</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYBAyNNAzMjQyMtc3M08v1i1JNTDnZBBy9PUM8owPCXaONzIwMtCryizgYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMWm6uIc4euimJJYnJmSWp8QVFmbmJRZXxhgbxYAPjQQbGgww0JkkxAGaeKjw</recordid><startdate>20201023</startdate><enddate>20201023</enddate><creator>Amiri, Amirali</creator><creator>Zdun, Uwe</creator><creator>van Hoorn, André</creator><general>IEEE DataPort</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6915-6711</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201023</creationdate><title>AMIRI_TSC_2020.zip</title><author>Amiri, Amirali ; Zdun, Uwe ; van Hoorn, André</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_21227_67gs_te073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Reliability</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amiri, Amirali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zdun, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hoorn, André</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amiri, Amirali</au><au>Zdun, Uwe</au><au>van Hoorn, André</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>AMIRI_TSC_2020.zip</title><date>2020-10-23</date><risdate>2020</risdate><abstract>Context:Various patterns of dynamic routing architectures are used in service- and cloud-based environments, including sidecar-based routing, routing through a central entity such as an event store, or architectures with multiple dynamic routers.Objective:Choosing the wrong architecture may severely impact the reliability or performance of a software system. This article’s objective is to provide models and empirical evidence to precisely estimate the reliability and performance impacts.Method:We propose an analytical model of request loss for reliability modeling. We studied the accuracy of this model’s predictions empirically and calculated the error rate in 200 experiment runs, during which we measured the round-trip time performance and created a performance model based on multiple regression analysis. Finally, we systematically analyzed the reliability and performance impacts and trade-offs.Results and Conclusions:The comparison of the empirical data to the reliability model’s predictions shows a low enough and converging error rate for using the model during system architecting. The predictions of the performance model show that distributed approaches for dynamic data routing have a better performance compared to centralized solutions. Our results provide important new insights on dynamic routing architecture decisions to precisely estimate the trade-off between system reliability and performance.</abstract><pub>IEEE DataPort</pub><doi>10.21227/67gs-te07</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6915-6711</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.21227/67gs-te07
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_21227_67gs_te07
source DataCite
subjects Reliability
title AMIRI_TSC_2020.zip
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A28%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Amiri,%20Amirali&rft.date=2020-10-23&rft_id=info:doi/10.21227/67gs-te07&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_21227_67gs_te07%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true