How to best use environmental DNA for fungal red-listing?

For navigating the biodiversity crisis, a major knowledge gap is the conservation status of inconspicuous, but megadiverse and functionally important, soil microorganisms. Massive datasets on soil biota are now accumulating through molecular sampling approaches, but with limited input into practical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Copot, Ovidiu, Tedersoo, Leho, Lõhmus, Asko, Runnel, Kadri
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Copot, Ovidiu
Tedersoo, Leho
Lõhmus, Asko
Runnel, Kadri
description For navigating the biodiversity crisis, a major knowledge gap is the conservation status of inconspicuous, but megadiverse and functionally important, soil microorganisms. Massive datasets on soil biota are now accumulating through molecular sampling approaches, but with limited input into practical conservation. We investigated how DNA metabarcoding data of soil fungi contribute to regional Red List assessments that are currently fruit-body based. For nearly 1,500 regionally assessed species represented by ca. 15,000 fruit-body records, each soil sample increased range estimates of threatened and Near Threatened species by 0.18% on average. Even a moderate number of soil samples enabled us to document many previously unrecorded species. Yet, after cumulating >1000 soil samples, about half of the species on regional red list remained undetected. Thus, effective conservation assessment of soil biota requires combining the fruit-body and environmental DNA data, and special efforts to make these usable to conservationists.
doi_str_mv 10.15156/bio/2483908
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_15156_bio_2483908</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_15156_bio_2483908</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_15156_bio_24839083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBAxNNAzNDU0NdNPyszXNzKxMLY0sOBksPTIL1coyVdISi0uUSgtTlVIzSvLLMrPy03NK0nMUXDxc1RIyy9SSCvNSwdyi1JTdHMyi0sy89LteRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g46ba4izh25KYklicmZJanxBUWZuYlFlvKFBPNjmeKDN8VCbjUlUDgC3gjpN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>How to best use environmental DNA for fungal red-listing?</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Copot, Ovidiu ; Tedersoo, Leho ; Lõhmus, Asko ; Runnel, Kadri</creator><creatorcontrib>Copot, Ovidiu ; Tedersoo, Leho ; Lõhmus, Asko ; Runnel, Kadri</creatorcontrib><description>For navigating the biodiversity crisis, a major knowledge gap is the conservation status of inconspicuous, but megadiverse and functionally important, soil microorganisms. Massive datasets on soil biota are now accumulating through molecular sampling approaches, but with limited input into practical conservation. We investigated how DNA metabarcoding data of soil fungi contribute to regional Red List assessments that are currently fruit-body based. For nearly 1,500 regionally assessed species represented by ca. 15,000 fruit-body records, each soil sample increased range estimates of threatened and Near Threatened species by 0.18% on average. Even a moderate number of soil samples enabled us to document many previously unrecorded species. Yet, after cumulating &gt;1000 soil samples, about half of the species on regional red list remained undetected. Thus, effective conservation assessment of soil biota requires combining the fruit-body and environmental DNA data, and special efforts to make these usable to conservationists.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.15156/bio/2483908</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Tartu</publisher><creationdate>2022</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>777,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.15156/bio/2483908$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Copot, Ovidiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tedersoo, Leho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lõhmus, Asko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runnel, Kadri</creatorcontrib><title>How to best use environmental DNA for fungal red-listing?</title><description>For navigating the biodiversity crisis, a major knowledge gap is the conservation status of inconspicuous, but megadiverse and functionally important, soil microorganisms. Massive datasets on soil biota are now accumulating through molecular sampling approaches, but with limited input into practical conservation. We investigated how DNA metabarcoding data of soil fungi contribute to regional Red List assessments that are currently fruit-body based. For nearly 1,500 regionally assessed species represented by ca. 15,000 fruit-body records, each soil sample increased range estimates of threatened and Near Threatened species by 0.18% on average. Even a moderate number of soil samples enabled us to document many previously unrecorded species. Yet, after cumulating &gt;1000 soil samples, about half of the species on regional red list remained undetected. Thus, effective conservation assessment of soil biota requires combining the fruit-body and environmental DNA data, and special efforts to make these usable to conservationists.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYBAxNNAzNDU0NdNPyszXNzKxMLY0sOBksPTIL1coyVdISi0uUSgtTlVIzSvLLMrPy03NK0nMUXDxc1RIyy9SSCvNSwdyi1JTdHMyi0sy89LteRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g46ba4izh25KYklicmZJanxBUWZuYlFlvKFBPNjmeKDN8VCbjUlUDgC3gjpN</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Copot, Ovidiu</creator><creator>Tedersoo, Leho</creator><creator>Lõhmus, Asko</creator><creator>Runnel, Kadri</creator><general>University of Tartu</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>How to best use environmental DNA for fungal red-listing?</title><author>Copot, Ovidiu ; Tedersoo, Leho ; Lõhmus, Asko ; Runnel, Kadri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_15156_bio_24839083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Copot, Ovidiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tedersoo, Leho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lõhmus, Asko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runnel, Kadri</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Copot, Ovidiu</au><au>Tedersoo, Leho</au><au>Lõhmus, Asko</au><au>Runnel, Kadri</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>How to best use environmental DNA for fungal red-listing?</title><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>For navigating the biodiversity crisis, a major knowledge gap is the conservation status of inconspicuous, but megadiverse and functionally important, soil microorganisms. Massive datasets on soil biota are now accumulating through molecular sampling approaches, but with limited input into practical conservation. We investigated how DNA metabarcoding data of soil fungi contribute to regional Red List assessments that are currently fruit-body based. For nearly 1,500 regionally assessed species represented by ca. 15,000 fruit-body records, each soil sample increased range estimates of threatened and Near Threatened species by 0.18% on average. Even a moderate number of soil samples enabled us to document many previously unrecorded species. Yet, after cumulating &gt;1000 soil samples, about half of the species on regional red list remained undetected. Thus, effective conservation assessment of soil biota requires combining the fruit-body and environmental DNA data, and special efforts to make these usable to conservationists.</abstract><pub>University of Tartu</pub><doi>10.15156/bio/2483908</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.15156/bio/2483908
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_15156_bio_2483908
source DataCite
title How to best use environmental DNA for fungal red-listing?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T19%3A54%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Copot,%20Ovidiu&rft.date=2022&rft_id=info:doi/10.15156/bio/2483908&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_15156_bio_2483908%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true