Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU) : a research protocol

Population ageing and increasing chronic illness burden have sparked interest in innovative care models. While self-management interventions (SMIs) are drawing increasing attention, evidence of their efficacy is mostly based on pairwise meta-analysis, generally derived from randomised controlled tri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ballester, Marta, Orrego, Carola, Heijmans, Monique, Alonso-Coello, Pablo, Versteegh, Matthijs Michaël, Mavridis, Dimitri, Groene, Oliver, Immonen, Kaisa, Wagner, Cordula, Canelo Aybar, Carlos Gilberto, Suñol Sala, Rosa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Ballester, Marta
Orrego, Carola
Heijmans, Monique
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Versteegh, Matthijs Michaël
Mavridis, Dimitri
Groene, Oliver
Immonen, Kaisa
Wagner, Cordula
Canelo Aybar, Carlos Gilberto
Suñol Sala, Rosa
description Population ageing and increasing chronic illness burden have sparked interest in innovative care models. While self-management interventions (SMIs) are drawing increasing attention, evidence of their efficacy is mostly based on pairwise meta-analysis, generally derived from randomised controlled trials comparing interventions versus a control or no intervention. As such, relevant efficacy data for comparisons among different SMIs that can be applied to specific chronic conditions are missing. Therefore, the relevance of the available evidence for decision-making at clinical, organisational and policy levels is limited. To identify, compare and rank the most effective and cost-effective SMIs for adults with four high-priority chronic conditions: type 2 diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure. All activities will be conducted as part of the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe(COMPAR-EU, Comparing effectiveness of self-management interventions in 4 high priority chronic diseases inEurope) Project, an European Union (EU)-funded project designed to bridge the gap between current knowledge and practice on SMIs. In the first phase of the project, we will develop and validate a taxonomy, and a Core Outcome Set for each condition. These activities will inform a series of systematic review and network meta-analysis about the effectiveness of SMIs. We will also perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of the most effective SMIs and an evaluation of contextual factors. We will finally develop tailored decision-making tools for the different relevant stakeholders. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee (University Institute for Primary Care Research - IDIAP Jordi Gol). All patients and other stakeholders will provide informed consent prior to participation. This project has been funded by the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 754936). Results will be of interest to relevant stakeholder groups (patients, professionals, managers, policymakers and industry), and will be disseminated in a tailored multi-pronged approach that will include deployment of an interactive platform.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>csuc_XX2</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_csuc_recercat_oai_recercat_cat_2072_506459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_recercat_cat_2072_506459</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-csuc_recercat_oai_recercat_cat_2072_5064593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdTE1Lw0AQzaUHUf_DHNvDQq22pd4kpHgRRfQchulsdiCZCbMbwX_kzzSCKF49PB7v86z6qG0Y0UU7KImBY2Qq8sbKOQPqCchyCX9ti5C5j2FAxY4H1gKihX2Oi5jmWUG0ySFJl8LoYi7lHSi5qdD8qCf5KTaT28iwrB8fnu6eQ_O6gltAcM6MTglGt2Jk_UW1iNhnvvzm8-rq2LzU94HyRK0zsROW1lB-xRc26_2m3a53N9vD9X82n6bkZOk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU) : a research protocol</title><source>Recercat</source><creator>Ballester, Marta ; Orrego, Carola ; Heijmans, Monique ; Alonso-Coello, Pablo ; Versteegh, Matthijs Michaël ; Mavridis, Dimitri ; Groene, Oliver ; Immonen, Kaisa ; Wagner, Cordula ; Canelo Aybar, Carlos Gilberto ; Suñol Sala, Rosa</creator><creatorcontrib>Ballester, Marta ; Orrego, Carola ; Heijmans, Monique ; Alonso-Coello, Pablo ; Versteegh, Matthijs Michaël ; Mavridis, Dimitri ; Groene, Oliver ; Immonen, Kaisa ; Wagner, Cordula ; Canelo Aybar, Carlos Gilberto ; Suñol Sala, Rosa</creatorcontrib><description>Population ageing and increasing chronic illness burden have sparked interest in innovative care models. While self-management interventions (SMIs) are drawing increasing attention, evidence of their efficacy is mostly based on pairwise meta-analysis, generally derived from randomised controlled trials comparing interventions versus a control or no intervention. As such, relevant efficacy data for comparisons among different SMIs that can be applied to specific chronic conditions are missing. Therefore, the relevance of the available evidence for decision-making at clinical, organisational and policy levels is limited. To identify, compare and rank the most effective and cost-effective SMIs for adults with four high-priority chronic conditions: type 2 diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure. All activities will be conducted as part of the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe(COMPAR-EU, Comparing effectiveness of self-management interventions in 4 high priority chronic diseases inEurope) Project, an European Union (EU)-funded project designed to bridge the gap between current knowledge and practice on SMIs. In the first phase of the project, we will develop and validate a taxonomy, and a Core Outcome Set for each condition. These activities will inform a series of systematic review and network meta-analysis about the effectiveness of SMIs. We will also perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of the most effective SMIs and an evaluation of contextual factors. We will finally develop tailored decision-making tools for the different relevant stakeholders. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee (University Institute for Primary Care Research - IDIAP Jordi Gol). All patients and other stakeholders will provide informed consent prior to participation. This project has been funded by the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 754936). Results will be of interest to relevant stakeholder groups (patients, professionals, managers, policymakers and industry), and will be disseminated in a tailored multi-pronged approach that will include deployment of an interactive platform.</description><language>eng</language><subject>Health economics ; Protocols &amp; guidelines ; Public health ; Qualitative research ; Statistics &amp; research methods</subject><creationdate>2020</creationdate><rights>open access Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,26974</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://recercat.cat/handle/2072/506459$$EView_record_in_Consorci_de_Serveis_Universitaris_de_Catalunya_(CSUC)$$FView_record_in_$$GConsorci_de_Serveis_Universitaris_de_Catalunya_(CSUC)$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ballester, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orrego, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heijmans, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Coello, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Versteegh, Matthijs Michaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavridis, Dimitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groene, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Immonen, Kaisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Cordula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canelo Aybar, Carlos Gilberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suñol Sala, Rosa</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU) : a research protocol</title><description>Population ageing and increasing chronic illness burden have sparked interest in innovative care models. While self-management interventions (SMIs) are drawing increasing attention, evidence of their efficacy is mostly based on pairwise meta-analysis, generally derived from randomised controlled trials comparing interventions versus a control or no intervention. As such, relevant efficacy data for comparisons among different SMIs that can be applied to specific chronic conditions are missing. Therefore, the relevance of the available evidence for decision-making at clinical, organisational and policy levels is limited. To identify, compare and rank the most effective and cost-effective SMIs for adults with four high-priority chronic conditions: type 2 diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure. All activities will be conducted as part of the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe(COMPAR-EU, Comparing effectiveness of self-management interventions in 4 high priority chronic diseases inEurope) Project, an European Union (EU)-funded project designed to bridge the gap between current knowledge and practice on SMIs. In the first phase of the project, we will develop and validate a taxonomy, and a Core Outcome Set for each condition. These activities will inform a series of systematic review and network meta-analysis about the effectiveness of SMIs. We will also perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of the most effective SMIs and an evaluation of contextual factors. We will finally develop tailored decision-making tools for the different relevant stakeholders. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee (University Institute for Primary Care Research - IDIAP Jordi Gol). All patients and other stakeholders will provide informed consent prior to participation. This project has been funded by the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 754936). Results will be of interest to relevant stakeholder groups (patients, professionals, managers, policymakers and industry), and will be disseminated in a tailored multi-pronged approach that will include deployment of an interactive platform.</description><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Protocols &amp; guidelines</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Statistics &amp; research methods</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>XX2</sourceid><recordid>eNqdTE1Lw0AQzaUHUf_DHNvDQq22pd4kpHgRRfQchulsdiCZCbMbwX_kzzSCKF49PB7v86z6qG0Y0UU7KImBY2Qq8sbKOQPqCchyCX9ti5C5j2FAxY4H1gKihX2Oi5jmWUG0ySFJl8LoYi7lHSi5qdD8qCf5KTaT28iwrB8fnu6eQ_O6gltAcM6MTglGt2Jk_UW1iNhnvvzm8-rq2LzU94HyRK0zsROW1lB-xRc26_2m3a53N9vD9X82n6bkZOk</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Ballester, Marta</creator><creator>Orrego, Carola</creator><creator>Heijmans, Monique</creator><creator>Alonso-Coello, Pablo</creator><creator>Versteegh, Matthijs Michaël</creator><creator>Mavridis, Dimitri</creator><creator>Groene, Oliver</creator><creator>Immonen, Kaisa</creator><creator>Wagner, Cordula</creator><creator>Canelo Aybar, Carlos Gilberto</creator><creator>Suñol Sala, Rosa</creator><scope>XX2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU) : a research protocol</title><author>Ballester, Marta ; Orrego, Carola ; Heijmans, Monique ; Alonso-Coello, Pablo ; Versteegh, Matthijs Michaël ; Mavridis, Dimitri ; Groene, Oliver ; Immonen, Kaisa ; Wagner, Cordula ; Canelo Aybar, Carlos Gilberto ; Suñol Sala, Rosa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-csuc_recercat_oai_recercat_cat_2072_5064593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Protocols &amp; guidelines</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Statistics &amp; research methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ballester, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orrego, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heijmans, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Coello, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Versteegh, Matthijs Michaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavridis, Dimitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groene, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Immonen, Kaisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Cordula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canelo Aybar, Carlos Gilberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suñol Sala, Rosa</creatorcontrib><collection>Recercat</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ballester, Marta</au><au>Orrego, Carola</au><au>Heijmans, Monique</au><au>Alonso-Coello, Pablo</au><au>Versteegh, Matthijs Michaël</au><au>Mavridis, Dimitri</au><au>Groene, Oliver</au><au>Immonen, Kaisa</au><au>Wagner, Cordula</au><au>Canelo Aybar, Carlos Gilberto</au><au>Suñol Sala, Rosa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU) : a research protocol</atitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><abstract>Population ageing and increasing chronic illness burden have sparked interest in innovative care models. While self-management interventions (SMIs) are drawing increasing attention, evidence of their efficacy is mostly based on pairwise meta-analysis, generally derived from randomised controlled trials comparing interventions versus a control or no intervention. As such, relevant efficacy data for comparisons among different SMIs that can be applied to specific chronic conditions are missing. Therefore, the relevance of the available evidence for decision-making at clinical, organisational and policy levels is limited. To identify, compare and rank the most effective and cost-effective SMIs for adults with four high-priority chronic conditions: type 2 diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure. All activities will be conducted as part of the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe(COMPAR-EU, Comparing effectiveness of self-management interventions in 4 high priority chronic diseases inEurope) Project, an European Union (EU)-funded project designed to bridge the gap between current knowledge and practice on SMIs. In the first phase of the project, we will develop and validate a taxonomy, and a Core Outcome Set for each condition. These activities will inform a series of systematic review and network meta-analysis about the effectiveness of SMIs. We will also perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of the most effective SMIs and an evaluation of contextual factors. We will finally develop tailored decision-making tools for the different relevant stakeholders. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee (University Institute for Primary Care Research - IDIAP Jordi Gol). All patients and other stakeholders will provide informed consent prior to participation. This project has been funded by the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 754936). Results will be of interest to relevant stakeholder groups (patients, professionals, managers, policymakers and industry), and will be disseminated in a tailored multi-pronged approach that will include deployment of an interactive platform.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_csuc_recercat_oai_recercat_cat_2072_506459
source Recercat
subjects Health economics
Protocols & guidelines
Public health
Qualitative research
Statistics & research methods
title Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU) : a research protocol
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A31%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-csuc_XX2&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20effectiveness%20and%20cost-effectiveness%20of%20self-management%20interventions%20in%20four%20high-priority%20chronic%20conditions%20in%20Europe%20(COMPAR-EU)%20:%20a%20research%20protocol&rft.au=Ballester,%20Marta&rft.date=2020&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccsuc_XX2%3Eoai_recercat_cat_2072_506459%3C/csuc_XX2%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true