Effect of effervescent paracetamol on blood pressure: a crossover randomized clinical trial
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effect of effervescent paracetamol on office and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) compared with noneffervescent paracetamol in hypertensive patients. DESIGN:This was a multicenter open crossover randomized clinical trial. SETTING:Primary care centers in Catalonia and the Basq...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hypertension 2018-08, Vol.36 (8), p.1656-1662 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effect of effervescent paracetamol on office and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) compared with noneffervescent paracetamol in hypertensive patients.
DESIGN:This was a multicenter open crossover randomized clinical trial.
SETTING:Primary care centers in Catalonia and the Basque Country.
PARTICIPANTS:Inclusion criteria were office BP 150/95 mmHg or less and daytime ambulatory BP 140/90 mmHg or less, stable pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic antihypertensive treatment, and concomitant chronic osteoarticular pain.
INTERVENTIONS:Baseline randomized assignment to 3-week periods of effervescent paracetamol (1 g three times a day) first and noneffervescent paracetamol later, or inversely, during a 7-week study period. At the start and end of each treatment period, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring was performed.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Differences in 24-h SBP between baseline and end of both treatment periods. The main analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.
RESULTS:In intention-to-treat analysis, 46 patients were analyzed, 21 were treated with paracetamol effervescent and noneffervescent later, and 25 followed the opposite sequence. The difference in 24-h SBP between the two treatments was 3.99 mmHg (95% confidence interval 1.35–6.63; P = 0.004), higher in the effervescent paracetamol treatment period. Similarly, the per-protocol analysis showed a difference in 24-h SBP between the two groups of 5.04 mmHg (95% confidence interval 1.80–8.28; P = 0.004), higher in the effervescent paracetamol treatment period. Self-reported pain levels did not differ between groups and did not vary by treatment period. No serious adverse events were reported in either study arm.
CONCLUSION:Effervescent paracetamol tablets are responsible for a significant daytime and overall increase in ambulatory 24-h SBP.
TRIAL REGISTRATION:NCT02514538 EudraCT2010-023485-53. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0263-6352 1473-5598 |
DOI: | 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001733 |