Heuristic Evaluation in Practicing STEM Education Administrative Model for Extra-large Sized Secondary Schools: A Fieldwork Approach
The study aimed to verify a STEM education administrative model for extra-large sized secondary schools in Thailand using heuristic evaluation. A total of eight evaluators were selected to participate in heuristic evaluation to verify the model in terms of its suitability, possibility, and usefulnes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Journal of Religion 2024-08, Vol.5 (10), p.5237-5246 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5246 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 5237 |
container_title | International Journal of Religion |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Wongsa, Somchai Sirisooksilp, Saowanee Luanganggoon, Nuchwana Tang, Keow Ngang |
description | The study aimed to verify a STEM education administrative model for extra-large sized secondary schools in Thailand using heuristic evaluation. A total of eight evaluators were selected to participate in heuristic evaluation to verify the model in terms of its suitability, possibility, and usefulness. A multi-case study was employed using a fieldwork approach to evaluate the quality of the STEM education administrative model. The research tool was a set of established usability principles to evaluate the overall quality of the STEM education administrative model in three facets, namely suitability, possibility, and usefulness. A five-point Likert scale assessment document was used as a tool to measure the evaluators’ interpretations ranging from minimal to most appropriate levels. The overall findings showed that all the six factors of STEM education administrative model were found most appropriately practiced in terms of usefulness with mean score range from 4.93 to 4.95, suitability with mean score range from 4.79 to 4.84, and possibility with mean score range from 4.77 to 4.89. |
doi_str_mv | 10.61707/amxeey87 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_61707_amxeey87</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_61707_amxeey87</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c697-2e0878cef91e65b82857333a2608f48b169ad42fff94cb9296ecc81e74892b663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1OwzAQhC0EEhX0wBv4yiHg2Kl_uEVVSpFagZQeuEWOvW4NaVw5bWk58-BEFDjt7Dfa1WgQuknJHU8FEfd6fQA4SnGGBpQzlrARk-f_mr5eomHXvRFCWCqFZGqAvqawi77beoOLvW52eutDi32LX6I2PfXtEpeLYo4LuzMnM7dr3_YnsV_3gOfBQoNdiLg49CxpdFwCLv0nWFyCCa3V8YhLswqh6R5wjiceGvsR4jvON5sYtFldowunmw6Gv_MKLSbFYjxNZs-PT-N8lhiuREKB9KENOJUCH9WSypFgjGnKiXSZrFOutM2oc05lplZUcTBGpiAyqWjNObtCt6e3Joaui-CqTfTrPl2VkuqnwOqvQPYN59FmIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heuristic Evaluation in Practicing STEM Education Administrative Model for Extra-large Sized Secondary Schools: A Fieldwork Approach</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</source><creator>Wongsa, Somchai ; Sirisooksilp, Saowanee ; Luanganggoon, Nuchwana ; Tang, Keow Ngang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wongsa, Somchai ; Sirisooksilp, Saowanee ; Luanganggoon, Nuchwana ; Tang, Keow Ngang</creatorcontrib><description>The study aimed to verify a STEM education administrative model for extra-large sized secondary schools in Thailand using heuristic evaluation. A total of eight evaluators were selected to participate in heuristic evaluation to verify the model in terms of its suitability, possibility, and usefulness. A multi-case study was employed using a fieldwork approach to evaluate the quality of the STEM education administrative model. The research tool was a set of established usability principles to evaluate the overall quality of the STEM education administrative model in three facets, namely suitability, possibility, and usefulness. A five-point Likert scale assessment document was used as a tool to measure the evaluators’ interpretations ranging from minimal to most appropriate levels. The overall findings showed that all the six factors of STEM education administrative model were found most appropriately practiced in terms of usefulness with mean score range from 4.93 to 4.95, suitability with mean score range from 4.79 to 4.84, and possibility with mean score range from 4.77 to 4.89.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2633-352X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2633-3538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.61707/amxeey87</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International Journal of Religion, 2024-08, Vol.5 (10), p.5237-5246</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wongsa, Somchai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirisooksilp, Saowanee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luanganggoon, Nuchwana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Keow Ngang</creatorcontrib><title>Heuristic Evaluation in Practicing STEM Education Administrative Model for Extra-large Sized Secondary Schools: A Fieldwork Approach</title><title>International Journal of Religion</title><description>The study aimed to verify a STEM education administrative model for extra-large sized secondary schools in Thailand using heuristic evaluation. A total of eight evaluators were selected to participate in heuristic evaluation to verify the model in terms of its suitability, possibility, and usefulness. A multi-case study was employed using a fieldwork approach to evaluate the quality of the STEM education administrative model. The research tool was a set of established usability principles to evaluate the overall quality of the STEM education administrative model in three facets, namely suitability, possibility, and usefulness. A five-point Likert scale assessment document was used as a tool to measure the evaluators’ interpretations ranging from minimal to most appropriate levels. The overall findings showed that all the six factors of STEM education administrative model were found most appropriately practiced in terms of usefulness with mean score range from 4.93 to 4.95, suitability with mean score range from 4.79 to 4.84, and possibility with mean score range from 4.77 to 4.89.</description><issn>2633-352X</issn><issn>2633-3538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1OwzAQhC0EEhX0wBv4yiHg2Kl_uEVVSpFagZQeuEWOvW4NaVw5bWk58-BEFDjt7Dfa1WgQuknJHU8FEfd6fQA4SnGGBpQzlrARk-f_mr5eomHXvRFCWCqFZGqAvqawi77beoOLvW52eutDi32LX6I2PfXtEpeLYo4LuzMnM7dr3_YnsV_3gOfBQoNdiLg49CxpdFwCLv0nWFyCCa3V8YhLswqh6R5wjiceGvsR4jvON5sYtFldowunmw6Gv_MKLSbFYjxNZs-PT-N8lhiuREKB9KENOJUCH9WSypFgjGnKiXSZrFOutM2oc05lplZUcTBGpiAyqWjNObtCt6e3Joaui-CqTfTrPl2VkuqnwOqvQPYN59FmIA</recordid><startdate>20240802</startdate><enddate>20240802</enddate><creator>Wongsa, Somchai</creator><creator>Sirisooksilp, Saowanee</creator><creator>Luanganggoon, Nuchwana</creator><creator>Tang, Keow Ngang</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240802</creationdate><title>Heuristic Evaluation in Practicing STEM Education Administrative Model for Extra-large Sized Secondary Schools: A Fieldwork Approach</title><author>Wongsa, Somchai ; Sirisooksilp, Saowanee ; Luanganggoon, Nuchwana ; Tang, Keow Ngang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c697-2e0878cef91e65b82857333a2608f48b169ad42fff94cb9296ecc81e74892b663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wongsa, Somchai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirisooksilp, Saowanee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luanganggoon, Nuchwana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Keow Ngang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Religion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wongsa, Somchai</au><au>Sirisooksilp, Saowanee</au><au>Luanganggoon, Nuchwana</au><au>Tang, Keow Ngang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heuristic Evaluation in Practicing STEM Education Administrative Model for Extra-large Sized Secondary Schools: A Fieldwork Approach</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Religion</jtitle><date>2024-08-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>5237</spage><epage>5246</epage><pages>5237-5246</pages><issn>2633-352X</issn><eissn>2633-3538</eissn><abstract>The study aimed to verify a STEM education administrative model for extra-large sized secondary schools in Thailand using heuristic evaluation. A total of eight evaluators were selected to participate in heuristic evaluation to verify the model in terms of its suitability, possibility, and usefulness. A multi-case study was employed using a fieldwork approach to evaluate the quality of the STEM education administrative model. The research tool was a set of established usability principles to evaluate the overall quality of the STEM education administrative model in three facets, namely suitability, possibility, and usefulness. A five-point Likert scale assessment document was used as a tool to measure the evaluators’ interpretations ranging from minimal to most appropriate levels. The overall findings showed that all the six factors of STEM education administrative model were found most appropriately practiced in terms of usefulness with mean score range from 4.93 to 4.95, suitability with mean score range from 4.79 to 4.84, and possibility with mean score range from 4.77 to 4.89.</abstract><doi>10.61707/amxeey87</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2633-352X |
ispartof | International Journal of Religion, 2024-08, Vol.5 (10), p.5237-5246 |
issn | 2633-352X 2633-3538 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_61707_amxeey87 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals |
title | Heuristic Evaluation in Practicing STEM Education Administrative Model for Extra-large Sized Secondary Schools: A Fieldwork Approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A27%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heuristic%20Evaluation%20in%20Practicing%20STEM%20Education%20Administrative%20Model%20for%20Extra-large%20Sized%20Secondary%20Schools:%20A%20Fieldwork%20Approach&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Religion&rft.au=Wongsa,%20Somchai&rft.date=2024-08-02&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=5237&rft.epage=5246&rft.pages=5237-5246&rft.issn=2633-352X&rft.eissn=2633-3538&rft_id=info:doi/10.61707/amxeey87&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_61707_amxeey87%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |